Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Will the Air Force of the Future Be Capable of Flying?
The Foundry ^ | 11 Jan 12 | Michaela Bendikova

Posted on 01/12/2013 12:10:30 PM PST by SkyPilot

“Among the most difficult challenges facing the Air Force is the need to modernize,” writes Michael Donley, the Secretary of the Air Force.

Despite major engagements in Afghanistan, Iraq, Kosovo, and Libya since the end of the Cold War, the Air Force currently operates the oldest fleet it has ever had. Sadly, sequestration threatens the future of modernization plans, drives up operations and maintenance costs, and prevents the United States from building the Air Force that the country needs in the future.

The Air Force fleet is often described as “geriatric” or “decrepit.” It is becoming inadequate to support U.S. national security interests, too. Since 2001, the number of Air Force fighters has fallen by about 25 percent. The Air Force has 372 fewer F-16s, 263 fewer F-15s, and 52 fewer F-117s than were in the inventory in 2001, and no modern strategic bombers. The bulk of the bomber fleet comprises B-52s, which recently celebrated its 60th anniversary since it was first commissioned.

In The Heritage Foundation’s “America at Risk” video, General Dave Deptula mentions that the average age of the F-15 C & D models is approaching 30 years. In 2007, an F-15 broke in half during a training mission in St. Louis, Missouri. As a result of this incident, the whole F-15 program was grounded for months. One can hardly imagine what the consequences would be of such an incident during war.

The Air Force, however, does not operate only planes. It oversees and is responsible for modernizing U.S. satellite constellations (including the launch infrastructure), providing everything from early missile warning to navigation and intelligence. Just like other military services, the Air Force needs to maintain secure and resilient command and control infrastructure. The nation depends on these critical capabilities and on preserving their viability...

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: airforce; cuts; defense; sequestration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Several years ago, I was working in an Air Operations Center and Gen Deptula was in charge. I can tell you first hand that he is a gentleman, a patriot, and a warrior. The word "brilliant" is overused to describe people, but for this man it is appropriate.


Watch the video at the link. He lays out, in 3 minutes and 21 seconds, the foundation of how bad things are.

Our military is being systematically destroyed, and our President either does not care or that is his goal. It is either one or the other.

I have it on good authority that this week, the Secretary of the Air Force and the Air Force Chief of Staff flat out told the Deputy Secretary of Defense that Sequestration will cut so fast and so deeply that the Air Force will have to shut down almost all maintenance and will not even be able to keep the aged fleet it still does possess in the air.


According to Secretary Donley, the Air Force will have to shed $54 billion from its budget over the next five years under the Budget Control Act. Sequestration would likely increase this amount further. The Heritage Foundation identified $150 billion in annualized savings that would replace the sequestration cuts. Stopping sequestration should now be the first priority of Congress in order to preserve the nation’s capacity to keep the peace and sustain its commitment to allies around the world.

I consider it a national tragedy that we are spending hundreds upon hundreds of billions of dollars on Food Stamps, Section 8 housing, and Social Security Disability (which is loaded with fraud), and this nation's military is teetering on disaster.

The latest "Fiscal Cliff" deal spooned out $200 billion alone to extend unemployment benefits (yet again). This nation has spent over $750 billion (that is 3/4 of a trillion dollars) since 2008 - paying people not to work.

Everyone needs a helping hand from time to time, but this is obscene.

Shame on this nation, and her "leaders."

1 posted on 01/12/2013 12:10:34 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Will they all be flying Drones from remote locations in nondescript warehouses???

2 posted on 01/12/2013 12:16:02 PM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

First NASA and now the USAF?

Believe me...this isn’t because the pResident doesn’t care. He cares. This is his mission in life. He is the enemy of the people of the United States.

3 posted on 01/12/2013 12:16:22 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

“Our military is being systematically destroyed, and ... that is his goal.”

Yes, it is.

4 posted on 01/12/2013 12:18:44 PM PST by carriage_hill (AR-15s are the 21st Century's Muskets. Self-defense is the First Human Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

here’s an idea... QUIT GIVING AWAY OUR TECHNOLOGY!!! then we wouldn’t constantly need to be upgrading our weapons to stay ahead.

5 posted on 01/12/2013 12:26:17 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92

The Navy and Marine Corps are in the same “boat”.

6 posted on 01/12/2013 12:26:22 PM PST by Soul of the South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Which creates a higher percentage of commies: the USAF, or the Democrat Party?

7 posted on 01/12/2013 12:27:40 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

one single advance in technology can keep a civilization ahead of the rest of the world for centuries, IF we DONT GIVE THE TECHNOLOGY AWAY!

8 posted on 01/12/2013 12:27:48 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

you mean the drones which can have their command structure overriden and be commandeered at will by our enemy? those drones?

yea... we have a few ... lucky us

9 posted on 01/12/2013 12:30:11 PM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot


10 posted on 01/12/2013 12:32:51 PM PST by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Maybe we can pay the Russians to fly us to our targets — you know, like NASA.

11 posted on 01/12/2013 12:35:12 PM PST by Migraine (Diversity is great; until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

Good point. As a retired flyboy I agree we’re all in this together and it doesn’t look good.

Still the USAF and Navy have been back burnered as opposed to the ground forces as the focus for the past 12 years has been fighting guerrillas. God forbid we have to face China in a full up war. We could wind up repeating Pearl Harbor, Hickam and Clark Fields all at once.

12 posted on 01/12/2013 12:36:33 PM PST by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: meadsjn

Not very many communists in the USAF...

13 posted on 01/12/2013 12:38:45 PM PST by Mr Rogers (America is becoming California, and California is becoming Detroit. Detroit is already hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
And while the government becomes increasingly bankrupt, a new generation of fighters would likely cost close to $1 billion per copy.

As a side note, the USA produced about 14,000 P-51's during WWII. The 1945 cost was $50,985 per copy, which is equal to about $640,000 in 2012 dollars. Do you think they US Government and Defense establishment could even come close to duplicating such a feat today, even with all the advanced technology we supposedly now possess?

14 posted on 01/12/2013 12:39:00 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South

sad and dangerous for ALL the services AND this country.

weak and weaker, dumb and dumber. Every drawdown has led to inability to meet the need for a country to adequately defend itself when aggressors attack. Guess this must be part of obummer’s radical transformation...

15 posted on 01/12/2013 12:39:50 PM PST by sassy steel magnolia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

Thanks. Just wondering.

16 posted on 01/12/2013 12:41:43 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Plus Obama is reducing the nuclear weapons arsenal. His goal is to reduce the total number of US nuclear weapons to 150 on the way to zero. Don’t be surprised if there is soon an executive order (perhaps secret one) eliminating the US nuclear weapons capability.

17 posted on 01/12/2013 12:43:33 PM PST by Soul of the South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Nonetheless, you cannot take an airframe designed for 4,000 hourz of flight time and stress and then extend it to 8,000 to 12,000 hours of flight time without serious consequences. Using these aircraft for 30 to 60 yearrs is nothing short of astonishing, but you are not going to win air battles with them for much longer. The consequences will catch up sooner than later.

18 posted on 01/12/2013 12:44:53 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PGR88

There really was something about that WWII generation. They were building ships in just a few days.

I saw a program on restoring a Sherman tank on one of the educational channels. They had the original manuals and even some of the old parts which were still new in their containers. After taking the engine out, rebuilding it and putting it back in they were amazed that during the war they could replace an engine in two hours, out in the field.

I have the history of my Father’s outfit, which was a combat engineers battalion. Reading of the jobs they did, I was truly in awe of what they were able to do in such short times. Jobs which now would take months or even more were done in just a couple of days, then they were on the next job immediately.

19 posted on 01/12/2013 12:47:45 PM PST by yarddog (One shot one miss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

The P-51 I mentioned, had its first working model a mere 102 days after the contract was issued!

Look at the Hoover Dam project of the 1930’s. In today’s money, the whole project would have cost about $600 million, and was finished in about 4 years. Could we repeat that today?? Even with our increases in private productivity, computers, design? No way!

We have a massive, bloated Government - the most expensive and complicated probably ever seen on the face of the Earth. The complexity and inefficiency has been baked into the pie over the last 50 years. It didn’t start in 2008, although it really has accelerated since then.

Patriots like Gen. Deptula worry about how we are going to fight a war with and replace 30 year old airplanes - when new ones will cost exponentially higher. I tell you - it won’t happen, at least not on our present course.

The foundation was already weak - Obama is nonetheless happy to give it a good kick so that you will really see it start to crumble.

20 posted on 01/12/2013 1:09:44 PM PST by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson