Jobs Stall Out in 2012-Q4

Townhall.com ^ | January 13, 2013 | Political Calculations

[Kaslin]

According to the December 2012 employment situation report, job growth stalled out in the final three months of 2012, as the number of employed Americans (143,305,000) was nearly unchanged from the levels recorded in the previous two months.

That outcome is consistent with our earlier observation that the fourth quarter of 2012 would likely see a significant deceleration in economic activity following the comparatively robust pace of growth recorded in the third quarter.

Breaking down the employment situation by age groups, we find that the number of employed teens (Age 16-19) fell by 66,000 from November 2012 to December 2012 to 4,402,000 as the number of young adults (Age 20-24) declined by just 25,000 over the same time to 13,570,000. Meanwhile, the number of employed individuals Age 25 and older increased by 119,000 from the previous month to reach 125,333,000.

The latest employment situation report revises all the employment data obtained in the seasonally-adjusted household survey portion of the report going back to January 2008 to account for updated seasonal factors, which is typically done with the December jobs repot each year. Our chart in this post reflects these revisions, which affect the period of time in which the U.S. economy first went into recession (it peaked in December 2007 and began declining in the months afterward) and its subsequent recovery.

Perhaps the most remarkable aspect in the chart above is that there has been no effective improvement in the employment situation for U.S. teens since the recession officially ended in June 2009. In fact, since October 2009, which marks the effective end of the decline in the number of employed teens, the number of working teens in the United States has held level at approximately 4,382,000, plus or minus 152,000 teens, in all the months since.

As such, the disappearance of jobs for U.S. teens represents a very large share of the jobs gap that has restrained the recovery of the U.S. economy.

On a final note, the January 2013 employment situation report, set to be released on 1 February 2013, will reflect more substantial revisions to both the establishment and household survey portions of the report, with the household survey portion being updated to account for the U.S. Census Bureau's annual update of the U.S. population. Data from December 2012 or earlier will not be likewise adjusted, which may make direct comparisons between data being released in 2013 and data from earlier years really problematic.

[Don Corleone]

The new normal...about 15 to 17 percent actual.

[jonose]

Stalled? IMHO we are going to see a nosedive in employment as companies react to increased taxes, increased health care costs, and estimated costs of implementing obamacare.

Many companies that have been loosing money or on the edge will fold.

Other companies will simply trim headcounts to balance out the increased costs.

[mirkwood]

[bigbob]

Stalling precedes plummeting...

[blam]

GARY SHILLING: We're In For Another 5 Years Of Painful Deleveraging (Job Loss To Rise, 11.0%, 2015)

"…This implies that the 7.8% rate in December would be about 8.8% in December 2013, 9.9% in December 2014, 11.0% in December 2015"

[Little Bill]

My son recently got a job for the City of %%%%% in North Eastern Mass. The pay is lower than he would like, he can make that up on the side.

There ain't nothing in the Merrimack Valley for Mid-Twenty to Forty year old white workers with skills.

[pke]

Impossible! The Obama/Biden team have promised to fix the economy and create millions (maybe even billions) of jobs.

[Terry Mross]

I KNOW the democrats cheated. But I was thinking around 2 to 3% or so. I now wonder if obama didn’t get more than 40 to 45% of the vote. Maybe more than 50% of the people aren’t completely stupid after all.

[blam]

"There ain't nothing in the Merrimack Valley for Mid-Twenty to Forty year old white workers with skills. "

I read an interesting article a while back about how White males are/have been discriminated against for jobs. The upside was that because they couldn't get jobs, they were forced to start their own small buisiness to have a job......and they quietly got rich.(That maybe why Obama is coming after small-businesses, look who owns them)