Skip to comments.(shortened) Piers Morgan thinks a tyrannical U.S. government is ....(going to) nuke us all
Posted on 01/14/2013 5:20:01 AM PST by Sir Napsalot
Piers Morgan has finally said something so stupid, it couldve come out of the mouth of Larry King.
Morgan is obviously still filled with helpless shame after losing that gun-control debate to Ben Shapiro, because hes still coming up with stuff he thinks he shouldve said that night. Thats why, instead of keeping it to himself, he delighted us all with this:
"America has over 5000 nuclear warheads. Quite hard to defend against a tyrannical U.S. government with that kind of firepower. #GetReal"
Piers Morgan (@piersmorgan) January 13, 2013
Piers Morgan thinks a tyrannical U.S. government is impossible, and it doesnt matter anyway because theyd just nuke us all
He was THROWN OUT OF HIS JOB IN THE UK for faking photos
and lying. ==> Immediately adoption by the American MSM.
Piers thinks? Who knew?
But if they nukes us who would they tax? Iraqis, maybe.
Well Piers, that option won’t be employed until they figure out how to selectively target only white, Christian, men.
LOL what an idiot.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
The "idiot" is getting more attention now than he ever did from his stupid talk show.
It's all for ratings.
“it doesnt matter anyway because theyd just nuke us all”
That depends on what the meaning of the word “us” is.
The feds might nuke one city and blame it on the Tea Party in the mother of all false flag events. Problem is they don't want to nuke their own so they'll nuke a red state city, which makes no sense, but when has that ever stopped the MSM from clicking their heels and reporting whatever is spoon fed to them by the obamunists.
You have made a compellingly strong argument for citizens to arm up with RPGs and/or (VB)IEDs, against a tyrannical government that had used ‘tanks’ on its own citizens in the past.
“It’s all for ratings.”
I think your right, but what this AHOLE does not know is what the definition of the word “BACKLASH” is. But he’s gonna find out.
“They” will nuke one of their own, if it comes to that. Bill Ayers said sacrificing 20 ~ 30 millions was ‘acceptable’.
Red state cities are virtually all blue anyway.
Every time a lib-tard/muzzie/wacko/racist puts-up an index finger to lecture us, I want to cut it off w/ boltcutters!
Sure, because the US is so quick to use nukes in every conflict we have been in since WWII. That’s why Korea and the Middle East are glowing right now.
Who cares?....get the hell out of the U.S...... Piers!
It's not helping! ..he doesn't even beat Rachel Madcow over at MSNBC for his time slot.
Assad has jet planes, tanks, and chemical weapons. How is that superiority working out for him?
Lefties illogically state that I don’t need an “assault rifle” because the government has tanks, i.e. I’m outgunned, and therefore I should accept that I am defenseless against the state.
However, the logical response to Theyve got tanks! is So you are saying that the citizenry should have full access to anti-tank weapons? OK, I concede.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.