Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New pay-per-mile scheme would boost taxes 250 percent
http://washingtonexaminer.com ^ | january 14, 2013 | paul bedard

Posted on 01/14/2013 2:32:31 PM PST by lowbridge

An on-again, off-again move by the Obama administration to scrap the federal gas tax in favor of a pay-per-mile fee would boost the tab to Americans as high as 250 percent, raising their current tax of 18.4 cents a gallon to as high as 46 cents, according to a new government study.

But without a tax increase, said the Government Accountability Office study, the government's highway fund is going to go dry. One reason the fund is going broke: President Obama's push for fuel efficient cars has resulted in better mileage, and fewer stops at the pump.

The GAO study is just the latest review of federal spending that paints a grim picture of the nation's infrastructure. Just keeping spending at current levels, the GAO said, would require a near doubling of the gas tax to 32 cents a gallon, and that would jump to as high as 46 cents should the federal government add spending to fix crumbling infrastructure and build new roads.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bhofascism; democrats; gao; gas; govtabuse; gps; obama; paypermile; spy; taxes; taxhike; tracking
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: pepperdog
it will tell them how much you drive, where you drive and it will try to control your movement.

I doubt a mere odometer inspection could tell them all that. I prefer the present system, because it's a no-brainer, but was simply speculating about how they'd collect a mileage tax. I suspect it's stillborn, but if they implemented it, I think collection would involve the path of least resistance (in terms of cost and legislative opposition), meaning an annual odometer reading.

41 posted on 01/14/2013 3:28:19 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

“put a GPS tracker in every car.”

How will that cover all of the alternate means of transportation? Here in WA they bring up a bike tax once in awhile. It would make more sense to implant a GPS chip in your body, with everyone having a unique number. Combine it with a universal credit card too so you could buy and sell things. I might be a good idea to tattoo your number on your arm so you don’t forget it.


42 posted on 01/14/2013 3:29:11 PM PST by 21twelve (So I [God] gave them over to their stubborn hearts to follow their own devices. Psalm 81:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

Trust me. After you’re dead, they will make you pay taxes at least one more time, twice if you include estate taxes.


43 posted on 01/14/2013 3:31:31 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601

I’m trying but not following your reasoning. How would people traveling thru or tourists pay nothing. If it’s a charge per mile driven they would be charged. However, it’s not about raising tax dollars anyway, it’s about tracking your movements, don’t fall for the fake.


44 posted on 01/14/2013 3:32:32 PM PST by pepperdog ( I still get a thrill up my leg when spell check doesn't recognize the name/word Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
I'm telling you...It's what the whack left wants for us all...A damn bicycle and a mud hut!

For you and me...but not for them. Profit is a horrble thing except when the liberal profits.

45 posted on 01/14/2013 3:35:19 PM PST by VRW Conspirator (Sometimes it takes calamity to lead to serenity - FReeper RacerX1128)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
The "sensible" thing to do is GET THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OUT OF THE HIGHWAY BUSINESS and leave it to the states where it belongs.

Everybody is in favor of being "sensible," right?

46 posted on 01/14/2013 3:41:26 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Tax per mile? No Problem!

Just take the Subway, the EL, Amtrak, BART, MTA or the METRO!

These new taxes will only affect those bitter clingers in flyover country. Truck drivers, road warriors, construction workers moving from project to project, college students going home on break, servicemen on leave, vacationers taking the family to visit the sunbelt or our national parks.

No problems at all with taxing by the mile...

/sarc


47 posted on 01/14/2013 3:46:31 PM PST by BwanaNdege ("To learn who rules over you simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize"- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I worked for my states DOT as an intern in college (late 80s).

The amount of waste was phenomenal.

My favorite example was the wonderful, specialized, and very expensive road design computer system they showed me when I started. It was turned off. Nobody knew how to use it and there was no funding for a specialized “body” to sit there and operate it. So it sat, in a prominent place in the design area. A nice little monument to government waste, IMHO.

I didn’t know much about computers back then, but PCs were relatively new and this thing had a huge display. I’m sure it was at least a minicomputer of some sort - definitely not in the PC category. This was back when having a color VGA monitor was a pretty big deal.

I’m sure by the time someone actually turned it on and used it, it was obsolete. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was scrapped without ever having been used.


48 posted on 01/14/2013 3:48:13 PM PST by chrisser (Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pepperdog

If my state of VA were to eliminate the gas tax and impose a mileage tax instead, none of the tourists that flock to Virginia Beach and Williamsburg nor military with out of state vehicles nor people passing through would pay anything. At least with the gas tax, they pay when they get gas. That was my point. Yes, I know, this particular article is a federal tax, but I am speaking in general.

I would not support anything that tracked my movement... and that would not be necessary even if there was a mileage tax. I would not support anything that wasn’t revenue neutral either, with would include this nugget in the article.


49 posted on 01/14/2013 3:49:31 PM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I’ve always said they will always find an excuse to confiscate more money from you, even when you do what they tell you to do.

Government: Buy hybrids, use less gas, save some money at the pump, save the planet.

Sheeple: Okay we’ll buy a premium auto with a high price because of exotic technology. And we are a smaller car that hammers the road less, and we use less gas, we’re good liberals not polluting the planet.

Government: you’re not buying enough gas, we aren’t getting enough taxes from you, we will now tax you by the mile.

Sheeple: But I spent a ton on the car and it’s smaller than other vehicles and I’m saving the planet and using less gas, but you can’t live without the few extra gallons less I use?

Government: yes. Just because you do as we say, doesn’t mean you can’t get away with not paying your fair share. You still use the roads.

Sheeple: But I can hardly haul anything in my car! It is also real dangerous to use being so small and in the winter it’s dangerous to operate.

Government: That isn’t our problem. Our problem is you aren’t paying us your fair share. If you had your old car you’d be buying more gas and paying more taxes.

Sheeple: But wasn’t that part of the whole idea you said about “saving some at the pump”?

Government: No, just saving on gas, not on the taxes we need from you.

Sheeple: but I paid a ton of money up front for the hybrid in the first place! I haven’t saved that extra amount in gas yet!

Government: Not our problem. Didn’t you get our subsidy for hybrids?

Sheeple: yes, but the car was still about 12,000 dollars more than an equivalent, high efficiency small conventional car.

Government: you’re still evading taxes by not filling up as much.

Sheeple: How am I evading taxes if I don’t physically use the gas?

Government: You are physically using the road.

Sheeple: My property taxes pay for my local roads, which are a disaster. The state and federal gas taxes pay for local, state and federal roadwork. I am not undertaxed.

Government: You cannot just use less gas but drive the same amount of miles and not be cheating the government out of money.

Sheeple: well, what if I drive less? What if I stop driving altogether? Then what?

Government: Then we will get the IRS criminal investigation division to investigate you for willful tax evasion.

Sheeple: OMG you are kidding, right?

Government: We never kid about taxes. We’re just here to help you.


50 posted on 01/14/2013 3:50:44 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

I see horses, bicycles, possibly even rickshaws. This putz wants us to live like a 3rd world people so that we all share a “fair” approach to life. He is the most despicable, vile person I have witnessed in my 66 years, bar none.


51 posted on 01/14/2013 3:53:02 PM PST by rhubarbk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

NO chance the cost of goods will skyrocket. No chance at all.

Idiots, the whole lot.


52 posted on 01/14/2013 3:53:50 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

I see a rise in missing gasoline tankers, unless they’re moving around in armed convoys.


53 posted on 01/14/2013 3:56:01 PM PST by GreyHoundSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ImProudToBeAnAmerican
It’s getting time to go Civil War & Galt, my friends.
54 posted on 01/14/2013 3:57:07 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rhubarbk
Agreed. He is both immoral and amoral. Re RFID: Hitachi powder-
55 posted on 01/14/2013 4:01:09 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Now Tol, how did you know this article would pique my interest? LOL.

A LOT of conservatives, unfortunately, support the idea of paying by the mile. The Dems LOVE IT, as it gets them the wedge they need to start controlling people’s driving ‘habits’ (as they see it).

Once you have pay by the mile, then you start charging based on the vehicle - obviously a bigger vehicle should pay more (i.e., that F250 doesn’t look as glamorous when you have to pay 20 cents per mile to drive it, does it?). Then you start charging based on time of day - in order to get more people to go to Walmart at 3 AM, when the roads are underutilized (and if thousands of women get raped at that hour, those are the breaks). Then you charge based on the roads they drive - if a road is overcrowded, like US-290 in Houston, then, OF COURSE, charge much more to drive on it. Then you start charging based on income - why should ‘the poor’ have to go broke to drive when (and where) they want, while the 1% doesn’t even notice the cost?

So you tell conservatives that you are simply applying “Market Forces” and half of them fall for it. You tell the other half that you are going to make those 8,000,000 Chevy Volts on the road pay their “fair share” and you have the majority you need to get it going.

But like you said...raise the gas tax a bit, and there’s no issue paying for the roads. But that retains the freedom to drive what we want, when we want, and where we want. Too bad...that upsets the feds, and they will FINALLY take care of that problem.


56 posted on 01/14/2013 4:01:18 PM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

I am trying to analyze this problem and not just have a quick reaction. Those who use state or federal parks pay a charge to use them. Those who don’t use them (supposedly) don’t pay. If you have a special event that needs police presence, you have to pay for security. The police department is not going to assign 10 officers to personally benefit you. If you travel a toll road, you are paying for the upkeep, while those not using that road do not pay. If someone drives 50,000 miles and I drive 10,000, should he be paying more for the road maintenance he is using? After all, he is causing more wear and tear to the road. Just wondering.

That which does cause me a problem is that they have collected an enormous amount of taxes and not used them for infrastructure. That money they collect from drivers in taxes should be only for that purpose, not a general fund where the give it to the unions.

And then there is the situation with cars that get high gas mileage. They may be wearing out the infrastructure but paying very little for the use of the roads.


57 posted on 01/14/2013 4:11:29 PM PST by doug from upland (Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

They already have a solution for overcrowded freeways: congestion pricing. Just put those gantries up over a crowded freeway and charge more (via vehicle transponders) during rush hours than at other times. Don’t need a satellite.


58 posted on 01/14/2013 4:15:40 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

They wonder why we hate them.

Pass laws to make us burn food for fuel. Kills MPG.

And now want to change the rules because they cannot keep their political payoffs going.

Now they want to take our bullets.

They will never take away our rocks.


59 posted on 01/14/2013 4:23:09 PM PST by hadaclueonce (you are paying 12% more for fuel because of Ethanol. Smile big Corn Lobby,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hadaclueonce

They don’t wonder why we hate them. They KNOW why we hate them.

THEY COULDN’T CARE LESS!

They know we the people are going to do nothing to stop them.
They have a green light and are racing toward the finish line.


60 posted on 01/14/2013 4:28:19 PM PST by Aurorales (I will not be ridiculed into silence!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson