Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Here am I; send me! Volunteers available to protect our children
The Firearms Coalition ^ | The Firearms Coalition

Posted on 01/14/2013 4:55:51 PM PST by marktwain

With the NRA’s call for an armed police officer in every school, a debate has erupted over cost of such a strategy, but there is a much more efficient and inexpensive path to secure schools. For some reason the teachers’ unions, politicians, and school administrators think that teachers are somehow less responsible, less capable, and less trainable than those who choose a career in law enforcement, and that having anyone with access to a gun in school besides a uniformed police officer would interfere with children’s ability to learn. Setting aside those confused perceptions for a moment, what about those of us who are not teachers or school administrators? What about parents, grandparents, and other concerned citizens?

As the loving grandparent of a wonderful 6-year old, a veteran, shooter, and all-around good guy, my answer to school security is the same as Isaiah’s answer to God thousands of years ago; “Here am I; send me!”

I am competent with firearms. I work well under pressure. I have a proven track record as a responsible and law-abiding citizen, and I have a deep concern for the safety and security of my grandson and the other children who attend his school. I also know that there are literally millions of intelligent, responsible parents, grandparents, and concerned citizens just like me who would gladly step up to serve as protectors of their own local schools. All of us are ready, willing, and able to fill the security void exposed by the demented coward in Connecticut. We are here. We are available. We are ten million strong voices, all saying “Here am I; send me!”

Perhaps this is part of the broader idea that NRA was suggesting during their press conference. I don’t know their full plans. NRA’s Wayne LaPierre mentioned retired police and firefighters as potentially part of their proposed school security plan, and that’s a good start, but there is no rational reason to limit service only to these groups. There are plenty of other people who have what it takes to learn and implement security practices.

Some media have suggested that LaPierre called for the arming of teachers. That is a complete distortion. LaPierre’s call was specifically for armed police officers and then he mentioned the idea of drawing upon the experience and trust found in retired police and firefighters. Never did he suggest that teachers or other school staff be included in the NRA’s proposed security force.

I was personally disappointed that such an idea was not included, but I am less politically correct than Wayne and more confrontational in my opinions. The media’s distorted reporting of the NRA proposal demonstrates the wisdom of being excessively conservative in their initial announcement. Now, according to their plan, former congressman Asa Hutchinson will lead a team of experts in developing school security plans based on facts and logic, not emotion and irrational fear. I hope that Mr Hutchinson’s panel of experts will recognize the vast pool of qualified, caring individuals who would gladly put their lives on the line for the sake of innocent children.

I read recently that each full-time School Resource Officer in the state of Arizona costs their school over $95,000 a year – plus benefits. On the one hand we say, that’s a small price to pay for our children’s safety, but on the other hand, I ask, why would we pay so much when highly qualified and effective guards can be had for little or no cost at all.

As primarily a writer and researcher, my personal schedule and circumstance would allow me to provide my grandson’s school with full-time service in exchange for nothing more than a comfortable chair in a quiet corner with an internet connection. The majority of the day I would simply do my work as normal, but would do so while maintaining a view of the school’s entrance and with the means to stop an attacker close at hand. I know a number of other retired and self-employed individuals who could, and would do likewise. Others would require some small stipend or health insurance benefits to be able to provide full-time service, and still others could only serve part-time.

Another huge pool of qualified individuals ready and willing to take on this responsibility are, as mentioned earlier, the people who are already working at the schools and dealing with the children every day. There are teachers, school administrators, and other school personnel who would gladly join us in our mission to ensure the safety of our children. These are among the most highly educated, widely respected, and most reliable citizens in the country. The suggestion that they are somehow less capable or less responsible than the average police officer is idiotic. These are the people we trust with our children already, why would we doubt their ability to act responsibly with a firearm or in a crisis?

All of us, teachers, parents, grandparents, and other concerned citizens would be willing to submit to background checks, psychological evaluations, and undergo special training. Most of us could even provide our own weapons and ammunition. We don’t need extravagant salaries or fancy uniforms, we just need a commitment from politicians and school administrators to support our efforts and provide us with the most basic resources to accomplish our mission.

The idea that police officers are the only ones capable of safely handling firearms or dealing with difficult or delicate situations is ridiculous. The fear that one of us would misplace a firearm, mistakenly shoot the wrong person, or go crazy and go on a rampage of our own, while not completely impossible, is so unlikely as to be ludicrous.

Our children are vulnerable. No gun bans or restrictions are going to stop lunatics who choose to target them. Whether they use guns, knives, automobiles, or samurai swords, the only way to stop them is to be able to physically incapacitate them instantaneously. Only a gun can reliably do that. Whether in the hand of a police officer, a school employee, or a community volunteer, only armed resistance can effectively stop an armed attack.

So in the wake of the terrible atrocity in Newtown, as the nation cries out for reassurance that their children are as safe as they can be, I ask responsible parents, grandparents, and school personnel to join me in answering the call and saying “Here am I; send me.”

Permission to reprint or post this article in its entirety is hereby granted provided this credit is included. Text is available at www.FirearmsCoalition.org. To receive The Firearms Coalition’s bi-monthly newsletter, The Knox Hard Corps Report, write to PO Box 1761, Buckeye, AZ 85326. ©Copyright 2011 Neal Knox Associates – The most trusted name in the rights movement. Share/Save/Bookmark


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; firearmscoalition; schoolshooting; volunteers
There are plenty of talented people available for this.
1 posted on 01/14/2013 4:56:00 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Another answer would be fully-screened armed private security guards, many of whom are veterans, which would be much less expensive than police officers. A friend of mine owns such a company and would be happy to speak with any school district or private school who feels the need.


2 posted on 01/14/2013 5:18:35 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Clint N. Suhks; lightman; thouworm; smokingfrog; mylife; WorkerbeeCitizen; ...

I’m retired at 63, after working for 41yrs in the fORTUNE 150 business world, the past 22 in my own local PA Family Farm Business. I have some very unique qualifications.

When, not if, the murderous muslim/islamist terrorist-sleeper cells get their *go orders*, there are hundreds and thousands of *soft target* opportunity slaughterhouses. It’ll come; they’re here hiding in plain sight, prepped and ready to act-out.

I’ll do it for free, until my retirement is finally fully-realized by the sale of my large Family Farm, this summer/fall. I’ll be contacting LEO friends and private contractor cos, to ask around.

Nothing America has is as precious and valuable as our children; they must be protected at all costs. If we guard banks, money shipments, hospitals, courthouses, officials, faux-celebs etc etc etc, why not schools and their precious charges?

Any thoughts?


3 posted on 01/14/2013 7:06:30 PM PST by carriage_hill (AR-15s are the 21st Century's Muskets. Self-Defense is The First Human Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am a Dad and Grandpa who is self employed, I will gladly spend my off days outside the “Gun-free zone” that is my childrens school. anyone trying to do harm to the children will have to get through me first!!!!

I am quite capable of putting steel downrange in the 5 ring all day long!!

Send Me!


4 posted on 01/14/2013 7:36:16 PM PST by Leofl (I'm from Texas, we don't dial 9-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

You’d have a lot of Libtard hoops to jump through. Nobel thought tho.

Not worth your back standing all day at your age. What happens when you need a lunch/bathroom break? “One” person at each school is not enough. Wish I could adopt a school and pay for that sacrifice.


5 posted on 01/14/2013 8:48:07 PM PST by Clint N. Suhks (“The amount of ammo you need is determined after the gunfight.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Good for you, if you can do it, go for it.


6 posted on 01/15/2013 2:22:12 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
Concealed carry is really the answer. The bad guys do not like the idea that anybody they run into could be armed.

But guns in schools do not fit the narrative of "guns are evil". The gun-grabbers cannot allow young skulls full of mush to see that guns can be used for their safety. Wouldn't be prudent!

7 posted on 01/15/2013 3:59:31 AM PST by cb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I’ve been patrolling two schools on my days off since the kids went back after Christmas and New Year break.


8 posted on 01/15/2013 4:17:56 AM PST by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl; carriage_hill
Good for you, if you can do it, go for it.

Seconded!
9 posted on 01/15/2013 5:20:59 AM PST by RandallFlagg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson