Skip to comments.Gun sale surge driven by fear, Obama says
Posted on 01/15/2013 4:29:06 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
It is fear.
Fear of what he may do next!
I went to my local gun shop today and saw that all the ARs were sold and even the older version Mini 14 I sold them a year ago—that was there 2 weeks ago finally got sold.
> Gun sale surge driven by fear, Obama says
It is NOT fear, you narcissistic tyrant.
It is DEFIANCE!
Fears may be well-founded.
It's almost as if nobody is actually listening to what he says, anyway, so he says the most outrageous, contradictory things. At least no-one in the media is calling him on it, and his followers don't notice the fallacies.
Dictators can be scary people. Even though Obama looks like a smirking faggot and putz of a man, it’s the weak and puny minded little farts who abuse power when they get it, and Obama, like Hitler, is as punkish as they come, though not as intelligent.
I was just in WalMart, Pismo Beach, CA- out of ammo due to high demand. .22LR, .30 .30, 45ACP and .38SPL.
Let me see; “folks” that shouldn’t have them . . would that be “Tea Party” “folks” and Conservative “folks”? Certainly not “Occupy” “folks”! Up is down. Down is up. Good is bad. Bad is good. - It IS scary.
Thanks Travis, I’ve been seeing and admiring your graphics.
Of course we are.
“Obama said he would unveil details of his “sensible, common-sense” program for tighter gun controls”
Notice that they call it a program and not a proposal. The President can only propose laws, he has no authority to make laws himself, so anything proper that he comes up with should at most be a proposal, to be submitted to Congress. The fact that they are calling it a “program” is admitting right there that what he is planning is unconstitutional.
Someone tried to tell me today that he was going to do this through Executive Orders, and read something from wikipedia that says EOs are binding laws. Well, I replied that I don’t give a darn what wikipedia, or the Supreme Court says about it, there is no authority in the Constitution for the President to make laws. If he tries to do that, I will consider them unconstitutional and feel free to disobey them at my discretion with no worries of conscience.
We are not supposed to notice those things. Such as noticing that shooting someone in California has less consequences then shooting someone in Texas.
Typical libs. I’m visitng my parents and dad had in on CNN (I know) and that Brit idiot Morgan came on and it was a “gun” special.
In the first 5 minutes they laid out some of the proposed ideas by the administration and the guest (some idiot mayor, Dem) actually said, “while these ideas won’t stop gun crime or violence, they are sensible”.
HUH? Orwell was a prophet.
Thanks, glad you like them, forward or copy them to your “moderate” friends and family.....it’s meme warfare.
You cannot defeat perfect utopian thinking with facts or logic.
It IS meme warfare... all we can do is turn the statehouses redder and redder since we lost national vote integrity.
Not by fear, asshole.
Should the federal government regulate guns of any type?
Yes, it should 20,366(23%)
No, it should not 64,655(76%)
Should Congress ban semi-automatic weapons?
Yes, it should 14,875(17%)
No, it should not 70,496(82%)
If Congress does not act, should President Obama use an executive order to ban or strictly control the sale of semi-automatic weapons?
Yes, he should 12,764(14%)
No, he should not 72,559(85%)
Do you agree that the Second Amendment gives citizens the right to own and bear guns without infringement?
Yes, I agree 73,634(86%)
No, I don't agree 11,755(13%)
Four to one against little bammy... .
You got that right, doofus.
Fear that the wannabe tinpot african muslim dictator will finish going through the Bill of Rights and cancelling them all untouched by Congress, the Law, the Supreme Court and supported by his perceived mandate by the mob of fraudulent voters.
I love how they don’t want to take away my guns. Well, except for AR-15s. But that doesn’t count.
Have you read Uninteded Consequences?
Obama’s gun control efforts are driven by fear.
He’s projecting the hysteria of his small anti-American, anti-Second-Amendment constituency on his enemies: Americans.
Possibly if he could read, but my guess is that he was an “affirmative action” graduate under the “everyone gets a trophy” program.
I’m angry and disgusted, not afraid.
...and that fear caused by statists like Obama is driving people to gun shops looking for a little bit of insurance.
Mr. President, you are mistaken. It’s not fear, it’s resolve.
Facts and logic cannot get a person out of a position that facts and logic did not get them into.
You know rational thinking is lacking when Pravda, Russias communist political newspaper, makes sense. In a recent article, Stanislav Mishin writes that after the Bolsheviks seized Moscow in 1917, they promised to leave alone the well-armed citizens if they did not interfere. They did not and for that were asked afterwards, writes Mishin, to come register themselves and their weapons, whereupon they were promptly shot.
From Cal Thomas: [ he doesn’t always resonate with me], but his column today was good.
Have you read Uninteded Consequences?
Not yet, but it's on my list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.