From the article:
" If youre defending yourself against a robber if you have a pistol permit or youre carrying a gun because you work for Wells Fargo and youre taking money in and out of a bank or something, two or three or four shots should be enoughperiod.
Nadler felt similarly about looting, riots, and mob situations. When asked about the looting circumstances that business owners faced post super storm Sandy, Nadler responded:
The same thing is the case. Second, there werent so many mobs looting (during Sandy). If you are in a store Im not aware of any mobs looting. One or two shots should be enough. You dont want to start mowing down 30 or 40 people. Hopefully youre not going to do that. You dont need to do that. The police shouldnt do that either. Nobody should be doing that. The only people who should ever be firing large clips of ammunition is the military.
Like many politicians he seems to have a fascination with the word "clips."
“Like many politicians he seems to have a fascination with the word “clips.””
Perhaps ‘magazines’ is too long a word for the CongressCritter?
LOL. This from a supporter of the Obama Administration which made sure that drug cartels got real assault/military weapons.
Why should the drug cartels get more powerful guns than law-abiding citizens. Let him show us- shut him up in a little shanty on the border with a couple of derringers and invite the drug cartel to a little contest.
“The only people who should ever be firing large clips of ammunition is the military.”
Of course this makes sense to Nadler because he envisions a time to come soon when the military will be tasked to eliminate millions of “useless eaters”. Naturally fatass does not expect to be one of those useless eaters even though he very obviously is the definition of useless eater.