Two Alinski tactics:
1)Keep the pressure on until the opponent eventually becomes to weak to fight back.
If that doesn't work......
2) Incite your opponent to anger, and then use their angry response as a weapon against them.
I think that he wants to keep pushing until someone or some group snaps enough to give him a reason to declare martial law.
He is devious and evil.
A core component of “community organizing” Alinsky style is agitating the opposition so it slips up, and we’re seeing it full-throttle.
>Why is he doing this? Why is he deliberately making people so upset? What is driving him? Anybody got any ideas?<
Is Rush dumb or just playing dummy?
Hey Rush, ever heard of the saying: ‘Divide, conquer and destroy’?
The left’s ultimate wet dream is to justifiably use deadly force against their political opponents.
How can someone who wants to "save the children" drive up the DEBT to levels they'll be paying for, for the rest of their lives?
All he's ever been is a community AGITATOR. Eventually, the opponent surrenders, or decides to fight back. Once the opponent fights back, you get to play the victim of his "uncontrollable" or "senceless" anger.
The homosexuals got where they are today by discusting and agitating people (deliberately getting themselves beat up) , and then they played on peoples hearts by claiming to be abused victims who needed special protections from all those bullies. It was they who agitated, but the real victims of their attacks, the straight guys they keep pushing to the limit, got blamed for it.
That, at least, is very clear, so clear that I suspect Rush of asking a rhetorical question. He's testing the envelope. He's trying to find out what the proggies can get away with, not just with respect to firearms but with respect to the Constitution. How much authoritarianism is going to be acceptable, and on which topics? If you're planning a quiet revolution you have to know this stuff.
My sense - and mind you, I'm in a conservative echo chamber every bit as seductive as that liberal echo chamber which is the NY-DC axis - my sense is that the blowback was astonishing.
More later as this percolates through the polity.
I kinda think he *planned* to do more, but upon seeing the reaction of the American people, he may have thought better of it & backed off.
I'm assuming that Rush is asking a rhetorical questions here, because if he isn't there really isn't any reason to continue listening to him in the future. The jug-eared POS is doing nothing short of "poking the cage", "stirring the pot", or input any other similar analogy. As his only alleged ability is that of a street punk agitator, he is causing as much mahem and uncertainty as he can; it's all he's ever accomplished in his worthless, scummy life... be a pain in the a$$ to civil society.
He's hoping to create enough chaos to incite his enemies (a.k.a. anyone who diagrees with his socialistic and tyrannical edicts) to publicly rebuke and/or even threaten him. By so doing he can further marginalize and demogogue otherwise normal, freedom-loving patriots, and with the treasonous presstitutes at his side suggest that such opposition can only be described as the work of ravenous and dangerous racists. All of which, of course, will require additional freedom-killing governmental action... lather, rinse, repeat until you have transformed the country into a socialist/communist cess pool, or as liberal scum refer to it... utopia.
Two things went thru my mind today:
1. Remember the pieces we have been reading over the past 6 months of the federal govt (HHS) buying billions of rounds of ammo? We never knew the purpose. Could it be they were preparing for this, i.e. - forced acceptance?
2. It is dangerous for Americans to be too complicit in allowing overly-aggressive techniques by the govt to ascertain “mentally instable” people that are not suitable to obtain a gun.
Who determines this definition of “mentally instable”? The govt. So a Tea Partier or a Rush Limbaugh or someone that the govt doesn’t agree with is conveniently placed in condition by the govt that they are not allowed to own a gun? What next after that? To have a driver’s license? to be able to vote in next election?
Never, Never put it past liberals on what they want. We are seeing that everyday courtesy of the lefthouse hellhole name Obama.
“Why is he deliberately making people so upset? What is driving him? Anybody got any ideas?”
Ask a Catholic priest that practices exorcism. He’ll explain it to you.
Its going to be a win-win-win for owebama. He’ll get some “gun measures” enacted, Republicans will act stupid, then he uses the whole mess against them in the mid-term elections. He ends up with the Senate and the House.
It’s all a trap and is more communist take down of America. Remember, the goal is to eventually take ALL GUNS from U.S. citizens.
It's the big gamble. He's putting it all out there. Either he gets slaughtered, he burns out and gives up, or WE give up. If the latter happens, he can get away with ANYthing and he's willing to bet the franchise on it.
He loses big and he's a 4-year lame duck. Or he gets his skinny butt impeached.
He cannot be impeached.
So insurrection would be the only way to be rid of this election stealing, Manchurian candidate.
He might be hoping for just that.
That being said, there is the Insurrection Act - the way around Posse Comitatus.
The Insurrection Act of 1807 gives the President the power to put down any insurrection or Rebellion.
Rush should read Whitaker Chambers “Witness”,he told you why decades ago,the communist strategy is to create chaos,then the champions come riding in on their white horses to save the day,or put another way,fundamentally transform the United States Of America.Say good bye to liberty and your freedoms one crisis at a time,hasn’t gotten to what you cherish yet,just wait