That is not and was not the argument. I have always accepted those principles as unassailable. The disagreement was about how to get the law, on all levels, in accord with that. The fact that you still don’t get that says a lot about how little you are capable of understanding. It’s unbelievable that you are still conflating the core principles with the means of changing the law. There is no correlation between the two. None. The first are immutable perfect truths of life. The second are simply the imperfect ways and means of human interaction.
Again, my position hasn’t changed one iota.
I can’t help it if you don’t understand it, even though it is incredibly simple, and has apparently been explained to you again and again.