Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Standing on the Graves of Sandy Hook
Townhall.com ^ | January 17, 2013 | Ben Shapiro

Posted on 01/17/2013 1:54:34 AM PST by Kaslin

Last week, I appeared on CNN's "Piers Morgan Tonight." For the past few weeks, Morgan had been inviting gun rights defenders ranging from the reasonable to the nutty, and then slamming them by appealing to the memory of the children slain at Sandy Hook. And when I appeared with Morgan, that's precisely what I told him: "What you tend to do is you tend to demonize people who differ from you politically by standing on the graves of the children of Sandy Hook, saying they don't seem to care enough about the dead kids." Morgan could only stammer, "How dare you!"

A few nights later, he invited me on again, specifically to stand once again on the graves of the children of Sandy Hook -- only this time, he would bring the parents of those children to make the imagistic point. His counterargument to accusation was to prove the veracity of my accusation.

But that's all the left's got on issues ranging from gun control to the debt ceiling: appeals to emotion and to the supposed moral shortcomings of their opposition. It's not just Piers Morgan doing this. It's President Obama, who held a press conference on gun control flanked by small children who had written him letters about violence using guns, then trotted out the grief-stricken parents of one of the children who murdered at Sandy Hook. "[M]ost of all," Obama intoned, " I think about how when it comes to protecting the most vulnerable among us, we must act now, for Grace, for the 25 other innocent children and devoted educators who had so much left to give; for the men and women in big cities and small towns who fall victims to senseless violence each and every day; for all the Americans who are counting on us to keep them safe from harm."

Obama's implication is clear: disagree with him, and you are fine with what happened in Sandy Hook.

That's a vile, despicable Maury Povich tactic. It's daytime talk show material, not honest political discussion about how to solve the problem of murder by guns in the United States. Not one of the solutions Obama proposes would have stopped what happened in Sandy Hook. Adam Lanza would have passed a background check. Lanza was armed with two handguns, not just an AR-15. Limiting the number of rounds per magazine accomplishes nothing, since it takes less than three seconds for a relative amateur to change magazines.

But here's the dirty little secret: this isn't about preventing another Sandy Hook for the left. It is about political posturing. If the left really wanted to be true to its own philosophy, it would simply attempt to repeal the Second Amendment and go for a total British-style gun ban. The vast majority of murders committed with guns in the United States are committed with handguns. Yet the left insists that it wants to leave private handgun ownership in place, while targeting so-called "assault rifles." That's not an attempt at a solution, even from the left. It's just preening for the cameras while pointing to the bodies of shooting victims.

We should be able to have a rational conversation in this country about policies that could prevent another Sandy Hook. Measures with regard to guns can be on the table -- so long as the discussion recognizes the importance of the Second Amendment and balances the rights and responsibilities of owning a firearm. But the left doesn't want to have that discussion. They just want the warm glow of moral righteousness in their breasts, even as they invade the rights of law-abiding citizens while making children less safe than they otherwise would be.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: banglist; barackobama; children; demagoguery; democrats; guncontrol; newtown; obama; piersmorgan; sandyhook; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: Kaslin
Twenty seconds into this MSNBC news item, the facts of "assault" weapons come out after a "complex" investigation.

http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495

21 posted on 01/17/2013 5:13:19 PM PST by Does so (Dims don't think ... they PLOT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Is it possible that some mental health professional released him into the custody of his mother certifying that he was not a threat to himself or society?

I believe the doctor who certifies that a mental patient can be released and not hurt others or himself should be held accountable for the killings the released patient commits. Make the doctor's release of the patient from custody a true responsibility with accountability. Same goes for judges of the court.

22 posted on 01/17/2013 5:23:42 PM PST by Rapscallion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Thanks. Let me bomb this thread to make these handy:

Only bad people need guns

.

3 psychos and 3 tyrants

.

Nazis-Obama- AK-47s X4

Whats the problem with gun registration?

Pied Piper 1

Pied Piper 2

Shindler Best

China X4

Pistols Bitter Clingers / Nazis

Crime chart by weapon type:


23 posted on 01/17/2013 5:57:17 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson