Skip to comments.Forget Sandy; Budget Real Disaster
Posted on 01/17/2013 6:05:09 AM PST by Kaslin
When the average person encounters a household disaster such as a blown furnace, a damaged roof in desperate need of repair, or leaking water pipes that create a major flood, they hope that homeowners insurance will cover the unforeseen expense.
However, it seems that recently, most insurance companies have been very fond of including clauses within insurance policies that somehow exonerate them from having to write a check. When that happens, the so-called insured must step back and examine what can and cannot be cut in their budget in order to facilitate the needed repairs.
The average person has no choice, they cant print money so they must decide which budget items must either be eliminated or reduced in order to pay the for the damage.
Speaking of unexpected expenditures, the position of our political leaders was recently revealed when Mick Mulvaney (R-SC) proposed to pay for the pork-laden Hurricane Sandy disaster relief bill by making equivalent cuts in other areas.
Of course, the bill was defeated with help from Tea Party stalwarts such as Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).
The argument goes that a national disaster should not be counted when it comes to balancing the budget; after all, nobody requested the type of colossal damage that Sandy inflicted.
I guess I can understand the attitude that everything should be put back the way it was, even though we have no money to do it.
Yet, if we totally rebuilt following the Johnstown Flood of 1889, the San Francisco earthquake of 1906, Hurricane Andrew in 1992, Hurricane Katrina in 2005, and in hundreds of other locations following natural disasters, why not in New York and New Jersey?
Of course, we had the money back then.
Using that logic, if we always had military bases around the world in order to meet the cold war menace, then why not to meet the terrorist threat?
Weve always provided full Medicare in the past, why not now and into the future?
Just like the Hurricane Sandy natural disaster, everything else that potentially could be cut has a history and is justifiable in fully maintaining the programs.
Apparently, that is the argument currently being made by Republicans and Democrats, liberals and conservatives, and Tea Party and non-Tea party members.
I thought the line in the sand had been drawn when U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) and gang couldnt cut $110 billion out of the $3.8 trillion budget.
Now, we see the line is even lower at $60 billion.
Within the next 45-days, well learn that there is no line and that these so-called legislators are so afraid of not being re-elected that the number of spending cuts will be zero for now but perhaps something in the future.
Too bad they dont need to run their House like the average citizen needs to run their house.
Mick Mulvaney (R-SC) has the right idea. Too bad the other assholes in the House are a bunch of wimps.
And I hope you are as pissed as I am that they larded this bill with enough pork to cause Moslems to have a heart attack.
No time for actual problems, there are votes to be bought!
$60B for Sandy? Why, that’s only $200 for every man, woman, and child in the U.S. Or $600 for every taxpayer.
Get out your checkbook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.