Skip to comments.Scarborough Warns: GOP ‘Better Tread Lightly,’ Obama Gun Proposals Enjoy ‘Overwhelming Support’
Posted on 01/17/2013 12:49:03 PM PST by ColdOne
After reviewing President Obamas 23 executive actions signed into law yesterday, Joe Scarborough said Thursday morning that his Republican Party had better proceed with caution, seeing as how he believes the policy proposals have the overwhelming support of the American people.
The presidents plan included universal background checks on gun purchases, which Scarborough said has the support of at least 85% of Americans. The presidents call for a
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
sorry Joe, no one on earth cares what you say any more
What a (self-edit)
I’d say more, but I better quit while I’m behind.
Meanwhile I am sitting here wondering who would not be with us today had a certain young, attractive intern to a Pensacola area Republican Congressman been armed.
Those who love liberty must undertake a massive outreach to millions of fellow citizens who have been victims of the so-called "progressive" censorship of the principles and ideas underlying their Constitution's protections. Such an effort is possible now, however, given the gift of technology which makes available the writings and speeches of the Founders at the click of a mouse, in every household in America.
Remember, an arrogant man who trusts his own judgment, largely informed by late-19th Century ideologues and the university professors and "progressives" who influenced his thinking, is no match for the wisdom and genius of the Framers of the United States Constitution.
The words of America's Founders, its Supreme Court Justices, its early Presidents and Statesmen attest to the wisdom of its structuring of, and strictly limiting, the coercive powers of all who might be elected to serve under and by its authority. The following essay, quoted with permission, originally published in the Constitution's Bicentennial Year - 1987 - may be downloaded here.
"The structure has been erected by architects of consummate skill and fidelity; its foundations are solid; its components are beautiful, as well as useful; its arrangements are full of wisdom and order...."
-Justice Joseph Story
Justice Story's words pay tribute to the United States Constitution and its Framers. Shortly before the 100th year of the Constitution, in his "History of the United States of America," written in 1886, historian George Bancroft said:
"The Constitution is to the American people a possession for the ages."
He went on to say:
"In America, a new people had risen up without king, or princes, or nobles....By calm meditation and friendly councils they had prepared a constitution which, in the union of freedom with strength and order, excelled every one known before; and which secured itself against violence and revolution by providing a peaceful method for every needed reform. In the happy morning of their existence as one of the powers of the world, they had chosen Justice as their guide."
And two hundred years after the adoption of this singularly-important document, praised by Justice Story in one century and Historian Bancroft in the next and said by Sir William Gladstone to be "the most wonderful work ever struck off at a given moment by the brain and purpose of man," the Constitution of 1787 - with its Bill of Rights - remains. . . a bulwark for liberty, an ageless formula for the government of a free people.
In what sense can any document prepared by human hands be said to be ageless? What are the qualities or attributes which give it permanence?
America's Constitution had its roots in the nature, experience, and habits of humankind, in the experience of the American people themselves - their beliefs, customs, and traditions, and in the practical aspects of politics and government. It was based on the experience of the ages. Its provisions were designed in recognition of principles which do not change with time and circumstance, because they are inherent in human nature.
"The foundation of every government," said John Adams, "is some principle or passion in the minds of the people." The founding generation, aware of its unique place in the ongoing human struggle for liberty, were willing to risk everything for its attainment. Roger Sherman stated that as government is "instituted for those who live under it ... it ought, therefore, to be so constituted as not to be dangerous to liberty." And the American government was structured with that primary purpose in mind - the protection of the peoples liberty.
Of their historic role, in framing a government to secure liberty, the Framers believed that the degree of wisdom and foresight brought to the task at hand might well determine whether future generations would live in liberty or tyranny. As President Washington so aptly put it, "the sacred fire of liberty" might depend "on the experiment intrusted to the hands of the American people" That experiment, they hoped, would serve as a beacon of liberty throughout the world.
The Framers of America's Constitution were guided by the wisdom of previous generations and the lessons of history for guidance in structuring a government to secure for untold millions in the future the unalienable rights of individuals. As Jefferson wisely observed:
"History, by apprising the people of the past, will enable them to judge of the future; it will avail them of the experience of other times and other nations; it will qualify them as judges of the actions and designs of men; it will enable them to know ambition under every disguise it may assume; and knowing it, to defeat its views."(Underlining added for emphasis)
The Constitution, it has been said, was "not formed upon abstraction," but upon practicality. Its philosophy and principles, among others, incorporated these practical aspects:
Recognition that love of liberty is inherent in the human spirit.
Recognition of Creator-endowed, unalienable, individual rights.
Recognition that meaningful liberty is possible only in the company of order and justice. In the words of Burke: "Liberty must be limited to be possessed."
Recognition that in order for a people to be free, they must be governed by fixed laws that apply alike to the governed and the government.
Recognition that the Creator has not preferred one person or group of persons as rulers over the others and that any government, in order to be just, must be from among the great body of the people and by their consent - that the people have a right to self-government.
Recognition of human weakness and the human tendency to abuse power; therefore, of the need to divide and to separate the power granted to government; to provide a system of checks and balances; and to make government accountable to people at frequent intervals.
Recognition that laws, to be valid, must have their basis and limit in natural law - that law which, as Cicero wrote, "is the highest reason, implanted in Nature, which commands what ought to be done and forbids the opposite."
Recognition of the need for structuring a government of laws, not of men, based on enduring principles and suitable not only to the age in which it is formed, but amendable to different circumstances and times, without sacrificing any of the three great concepts of Order, justice, or Liberty.
Recognition that the right to ownership of property is a right so compelling as to provide a primary reason for individuals to form a government for securing that right.
Recognition of the need for protecting the individual rights of each citizen, rich or poor, majority or minority, and of not allowing the coercive power of government to be used to do collectively that which the individual could not do without committing a crime.
Recognition of necessity for incentive and reward as impetus for achievement and growth.
Recognition of the need for a "Supreme Law of the land" a written constitution which, consistent with its idea of the sovereignty of the people, would provide its own prescribed amendment process, thereby circumventing any potential unconstitutional changes by any of the branches of government without the people's consent.
The Constitution of the United States of America structured a government for what the Founders called a "virtuous people - that is, a people who would be able, as Burke put it, to "put chains on their own appetites" and, without the coercive hand of government, to live peaceably without violating the rights of others. Such a society would need no standing armies to insure internal order, for the moral beliefs, customs, and love for liberty motivating the actions of the people and their representatives in government - the "unwritten" constitution - would be in keeping with their written constitution.
George Washington, in a speech to the State Governors, shared his own sense of the deep roots and foundations of the new nation:
"The foundation of our empire was not laid in the gloomy age of ignorance and superstition; but at an epocha when the rights of mankind were better understood and more clearly defined, than at any former period.... the treasures of knowledge, acquired by the labors of philosophers, sages, and legislators, through a long succession of years, are laid open for our use, and their collective wisdom may be happily applied in the establishment of our forms of government."
And Abraham Lincoln, in the mid-1800's, in celebrating the blessings of liberty, challenged Americans to transmit the "political edifice of liberty and equal rights" of their constitutional government to future generations:
"In the great journal of things happening under the sun, we, the American people, find our account running ... We find ourselves in the peaceful possession, of the fairest portion of the earth....We find ourselves under the government of a system of political institutions, conducing more essentially to the ends of civil and religious liberty, than any of which the history of former times tells us. We found ourselves the legal inheritors of these fundamental blessings. We toiled not in the acquirement or establishment of them - They are a legacy bequeathed us, by a once hardy, brave, and patriotic...race of ancestors. Theirs was the task (and nobly they performed it) to possess themselves, and through themselves, us, of this goodly land; and to uprear upon its hills and its valleys, a political edifice of liberty and equal rights, 'tis ours only, to transmit these...to the latest generation that fate shall permit the world to know...."
Because it rests on sound philosophical foundations and is rooted in enduring principles, the United States Constitution can, indeed, properly be described as "ageless," for it provides the formula for securing the blessings of liberty, establishing justice, insuring domestic tranquillity, promoting the general welfare, and providing for the common defense of a free people who understand its philosophy and principles and who will, with dedication, see that its integrity and vigor are preserved.
Justice Joseph Story was quoted in the caption of this essay as attesting to the skill and fidelity of the architects of the Constitution, its solid foundations, the practical aspects of its features, and its wisdom and order. The closing words of his statement, however, were reserved for use here; for in his 1789 remarks, he recognized the "ageless" quality of the magnificent document, and at the same time, issued a grave warning for Americans of all centuries. He concluded his statement with these words:
"...and its defenses are impregnable from without. It has been reared for immortality, if the work of man may justly aspire to such a title. It may, nevertheless, perish in an hour by the folly, or corruption, or negligence of its only keepers, THE PEOPLE. Republics are created by virtue, public spirit, and intelligence of the citizens."
Our ageless constitution can be shared with the world and passed on to generations far distant if its formula is not altered in violation of principle through the neglect of its keepers - THE PEOPLE.
Our Ageless Constitution, W. David Stedman & La Vaughn G. Lewis, Editors (Asheboro, NC, W. David Stedman Associates, 1987) Part VII: ISBN 0-937047-01-5
The GOP is already being pu$$y whipped?
There is no overwhelming support. There is just a bunch of citizens driven mad by Obama propaganda and his Cloward -Priven strategy. That kind of emotional hoo-haw can hardly be equated with support.
Anyone who is trukly educated on the facts would never support Obama’s gun control initiative. It will save no one, especially children in schools.
the policy proposals have the overwhelming support of the American people
Ah yes. Good old engineered or manufactured consent.
Most rational people would agree with me on this. ;~)
Time to put on the shtt kickers...not “tread lightly.”
Joe is SUCH a putz.
Overwhelming support from where..the 5 viewers who watch MSDNC
Joe who? Someone I should know? Someone I should give a sh*t about their opinion?
I didn’t think so.
Only in hell could Obama's actions be considered "signed" into law.
From Article One, Section One of the US Constitution ... ."All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Obama's way is precisely the way Adolf Hitler started out in 1933.
Those knock-off fragrances Mika's wearing have fried what's left of your brain, Joe...cash the checks while you still can.
Last night I stumbled onto Joe on PBS, talking about gun control....and I couldn’t believe it.
Every time he spouted some leftist propaganda, he made a point of telling the audience he was a Republican.
He might be a Republican; but, he’s not a conservative.
Joe makes me sick.
Joe ought to shut the hell up about some poll that was 9% weighted in favor of the Dims and also the pollster was/is an employee of ABC News. What a crock the GOP should grow a pair and start impeachment proceedings for ALL the violations of the constitution.
Joe S is revolting, even moreso than the self described leftists on that show.
Overwhelming support? Then why are Dem senators up for reelection in 2014 running from this thing as fast as they can? Even Franken won’t commit to it. Methinks their phone calls and internal polls are telling them something else.
The Rats own Joe, ain’t no doubt about it and it’s easy to guess the reason.
Joe sits in his big city where everyone agrees with him. He doesn’t have a clue what the real America thinks.
Isn’t it so wonderful and thoughtful of liberals that they always know what’s best for conservatives and tell us? If they were evil and underhanded, you might expect them to have ulterior motives in their advice.
KMA Joe Scarborough you donor of unhealthy stool.
May you get lockjaw and may it ruin your Homo sex life.
Forget 85%, can you even find me 85 Americans who understand just what the hell he proposed yesterday?
It may have overwhelming support in the blue cities where all the crime is but the empty gun shop shelves, the run on guns and attendance at gun shows says otherwise. These northeastern libs really need to get over themselves. There’s a whole other country out here.
They think if they keep saying it over and over it'll be a little more true.
Fact is, I don't know a single democrat who isn't rabidly pissed off about the possibility of more gun restrictions. These critters need to realize real quick that 2nd Amendment is NOT a partisan issue. The only ones screaming about it are the fringe left communists who hijacked the democrat party. Just go have a look over at DU if you want to witness a sample of this pit of vipers.
Is David Gregory in jail yesterday?
I now seriously believe the Dems have some very incriminating evidence on this piece of garbage.
Joe has sat there watching how gun sales have gone outta’ sight and still imagines there’s some fictional majority who are in favor of pulling security guards out of schools.
Just shut up Scarbourogh. Only idiots ever listen to your drivel anyway.
Who is Lori Klausutis?
Alex, she was the young women found dead in Joe Scarborough's office back in 2001.
>> Most rational people would agree with me on this. ;~)
I don’t know if I fit into the “rational” category or not — I kinda doubt it — but the wiki article, and the idea that the media manufactures consent, makes perfect sense to me anyhow.
And Benghazi was a “protest over an anti-Islam video” too!
scarborough is plugged into the rino culture. His new wife is a former bush campaign manager.
Scarborough lives in NYC and breathes the beltway cocktail circuit. he is reporting what the politicians see.
remember when advertising or demonstrating the politicans only see what is in DC. few go back home to their homes in a sock drawer.
Would someone please help me out. I can't find my "Give a damn," gauge...
He has become mentally unstable from living in New York among the liberals for so long.
Please see post #4, and thank you for yours.
I haven’t seen the list does anyone have the entire list?
If this is true, why didn’t Dear Leader order weapons confiscated?
I am so damn sick of liars. These liars need to be prosecuted.
Haven’t heard that Franken won’t commit to it. The union men in MN must have gotten next to Franken - denounce it or we will denounce you come election time.
Joe’s ratings on DNCTV are through the roof. bwa ha ha ha
hey, seriously, why do we even bother listening to assclown idiots like Joe?
OH REALLY???? thanks for that tidbit!
>Scarborough Warns: GOP Better Tread Lightly,<
You mean that even the wearing of kneepads by the GOP is considered aggressive?
This smells like a set up.
When the Obama forces tramp around in select states, it will be hoped that there will be plenty of applause, or chaos.
Which will it be?
Besides the MSM and the Dem party (same thing) where is the public demand for gun control? I have yet to talk to people who are overwhelmingly demanding more gun control. In fact if the issue comes up, most people are generally opposed. Even in the People’s socialist Republic of MA and CT.