Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Strategy to Govern - Ivory-tower Obama canít abide views he doesnít share. (Michael Barone)
National Review Online ^ | January 17, 2013 | Michael Barone

Posted on 01/17/2013 5:16:10 PM PST by neverdem

To judge from his surly demeanor and defiant words at his press conference on Monday, Barack Obama begins his second term with a strategy to defeat and humiliate Republicans rather than a strategy to govern.

His point-blank refusal to negotiate over the debt ceiling was clearly designed to make House Republicans look bad.

But Obama knows very well that negotiations usually accompany legislation to increase the government’s debt limit. As Gordon Gray of the conservative American Action Network points out, most of the 17 increases in the debt ceiling over the last 20 years have been part of broader measures.

Working out what will be in those measures is a matter for negotiation between the legislative and executive branches. That’s because the Constitution gives Congress the power to incur debt and the president the power to veto.

Obama supporters like to portray Republican attempts to negotiate as hostage-taking or extortion. But those are violent crimes. Negotiations — discussions attempting to reach agreement among those who differ — are peaceful acts.

What we do know, from Bob Woodward’s book The Price of Politics, is that Obama is not very good at negotiating. He apparently can’t stomach listening to views he does not share.

Perhaps that is to be expected of one who has chosen all his adult life to live in university communities and who made his way upward in the one-party politics of Chicago. Thus, on the fiscal cliff, he left the unpleasant business of listening to others’ views and reaching agreement to Joe Biden.

Obama has laid down another marker in his puzzling nomination of Chuck Hagel to be secretary of defense.

As the Washington Post editorial writers pointed out, Hagel — though a nominal Republican — has stood way to the left of Obama on whether a military option to stop Iran’s nuclear-weapons program is feasible.

Obama has said repeatedly that that option, however risky and unpalatable, is on the table. Hagel has said it shouldn’t be.

It’s not at all clear that Hagel has the experience and temperament to head the Pentagon. His vocal defenders tend to concentrate on attacking his detractors rather than make the affirmative case for his qualifications.

Hagel seems likely to be confirmed, given his endorsement by Senator Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) on Tuesday. But it’s interesting that no Republican senators have spoken up for him and that liberal Democratic senators like Bob Menendez (N.J.) and Ben Cardin (Md.) have declined to do so.

As defense secretary, Hagel seems likely to cut military personnel and capabilities. There’s undoubtedly some detritus that can be swept away. But his nomination seems less aimed at managing the military than at tormenting Republicans.

Then there is gun control. Some recent media polls show majority support for further restrictions on guns. If you phrase the question the right way, you tend to get that kind of response, especially after a horrifying crime like Newtown.

But new restrictions are unlikely to have any significant practical effect. The ban on assault weapons — a category defined mostly by cosmetics — certainly had none in the ten years it was in effect.

The fact is that we have many more guns and many fewer murders than we did 20 years ago. Allowing law-abiding citizens to carry concealed weapons, as most states do, has not resulted in the street shootouts some predicted.

Strict state gun-control laws did not stop the carnage in Newtown or the frequent killings on the streets of Chicago. The push for gun control is more a symbolic gesture than a serious attempt at governing.

Something better can be said about Obama’s call for immigration-law changes. The need for some change is clear. That was also true in Obama’s first two years, when he did nothing to advance legislation on the subject when Democrats had solid majorities in Congress.

The question is whether Obama wants legislation, or to stick it to the opposition. Many Republicans, like Senator Marco Rubio (Fla.), are ready to support legalization of those brought here as children but not immediate legalization for all 11 million illegals.

Negotiations and compromises will be needed to get a bill through Congress. A president interested in governing would not insist on getting his way 100 percent of the time. Whether Obama is such a president is far from clear.

– Michael Barone is senior political analyst for the Washington Examiner. © 2013 The Washington Examiner



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama

1 posted on 01/17/2013 5:16:24 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Pharaoh Obumer doesn't like it when people disagree with him.
2 posted on 01/17/2013 5:25:39 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
He has always been a classical pathological narcissist...they don't negotiate. His handlers selected him because his ego could rise to any occasion and stay true to his Communist principles.

That said, his bubble will burst one day.

The sooner, the better...for this loathsome little gay man.

3 posted on 01/17/2013 5:28:34 PM PST by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If Obama refuses to compromise while the legislation is being negotiated, write it to hand him a total defeat. He will learn.


4 posted on 01/17/2013 5:29:14 PM PST by Rapscallion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Obama is more like a dictator than a politician. He has no sense of give-and-take. “Stalinist” comes to mind....


5 posted on 01/17/2013 5:31:16 PM PST by Rapscallion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That’s because the Constitution gives Congress the power to incur debt and the president the power to veto.

Congress can override any presidential Veto, but it doesn't, under any circumstances, empower the executive to circumvent the powers of Congress.

Unless Omugabe intends to delare an arbitrary (and permanent) "State of Emergency."

Good luck with that!

6 posted on 01/17/2013 5:39:10 PM PST by publius911 (Look for the Union Label -- then buy something else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
That’s because the Constitution gives Congress the power to incur debt and the president the power to veto.

Congress can override any presidential Veto, but it doesn't, under any circumstances, empower the executive to circumvent the powers of Congress.

Unless Omugabe intends to delare an arbitrary (and permanent) "State of Emergency."

Good luck with that!

7 posted on 01/17/2013 5:39:55 PM PST by publius911 (Look for the Union Label -- then buy something else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"Narcissism" is an overused, and sometimes poorly used word here, but this is the essential hallmark of a dysfunctional narcissistic disorder: "He apparently can’t stomach listening to views he does not share."
8 posted on 01/17/2013 5:58:08 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The man is brittle.


9 posted on 01/17/2013 6:03:07 PM PST by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
He apparently can’t stomach listening to views he does not share...if your opponent is of an excitable nature, irritate him......
10 posted on 01/17/2013 9:05:47 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson