Egggsactly! Look at the number of precincts or counties that voted 90 plus percent or even OVER 100 percent for Obama. This election would have been close except for the Chicago style, Communist Union backed thievery that was employed to insure the Kenyan/Marxists re-election. Romney never had a prayer against such tactics and just for the record neither will any but a "Progressive" candidate in the next election should Obama consent to allow one.
Not that I know of. There were plenty of straight 100's (59 / 1500 in Philly) but none over 100. No 140% turnout either, only 70% times a two page ballot.
Well, just take a look at WHERE those precincts are. If they're deep in Philly or Chicago, there's no question but that they're accurate. Not many folks in urban areas with large minority populations were interested in Romney, so seeing those percentages doesn't surprise me in the least.
As the article says, we need to concentrate on a good candidate next time, not just the 'next in line'.