Yah, yeah, yeah.
Pardon me, but I’ve heard all this BS before.
INSTEAD OF splitting us up into groups, why not try TO PERSUADE the opposition to our point of view?
I mean—we ARE RIGHT, aren’t we?
So—let’s DOT IT already.
posted on 01/20/2013 6:45:27 AM PST
The fatal flaw in your argument is the assumption that the other side is open to logic and argument on this issue. They aren’t. It’s all emotion..
posted on 01/20/2013 6:51:15 AM PST
(The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
They’re not persuadable. They have more to gain by banning firearms than they do by being “right.”
posted on 01/20/2013 6:59:34 AM PST
by Little Ray
(Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
Yah, yeah, yeah. Pardon me, but Ive heard all this BS before. INSTEAD OF splitting us up into groups, why not try TO PERSUADE the opposition to our point of view? I meanwe ARE RIGHT, arent we? Solets DOT IT already.
It would be like trying to persuade someone who doesn't believe a .223 rifle was used in the school killing, that it was in fact used. Hard to argue/persuade a point with someone who refuses to listen.
posted on 01/20/2013 8:34:26 AM PST
(Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson