Skip to comments.Chris Wallace Grills David Plouffe: Why Won't Obama Challenge Hollywood on Violence?
Posted on 01/20/2013 12:05:22 PM PST by Nachum
According to Plouffe, it "starts with parents" taking responsibility for their children. Plouffe also attempted to note that the study commissioned by the president on violent media "is really important" because "scientific background" helps explain the causation between video games and gun violence.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
-if you can stand it
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
The left won’t criticize Hollywood, the source of big campaign contributions, and movies that enhance the leftist agenda.
I thought the left believed it took a village to raise a child, therefore the village bears responsibility for the child’s acts also.
That was a waste of a minute and a half.
You won’t get an answer from this Obama butt licker.
Let me answer it for you.
They support him with big bucks.
They support him by being celebrities whose celebrity impresses and blinds the idiots who vote for Obama.
Obama is a celebrity lover himself.
Last but not least, Obama doesn’t give a fug about how many people are killed by guns, that is proven in Chicago every day ,his home town is a circus of murderous tribal killers.
What Obama wants is to weaken the United States and turn us into a Socialist sh*thole and guns may stop him from doing that.
Although I am against restriction of the 2nd AND 1st amendments, it is very obvious that this is a political issue for the Obama admin and not a safety issue as claimed.
As much as I detest this administration and everyone involved with it, the dope got one thing right—it does start with parents taking responsibility for their children.
I bet you that is what they are thinking.
So, is he saying that single parent families are a bad for the children? The left ignore this fact.
Driven from two sides — the feminists who think that men are only needed for their seed and women would do just fine without them and the misogynists to think that the more “b!tchs” that they impregnate, the cooler that they become.
“Freedom for me, but not for thee.”
good point. Does the village take responsibility for problems in the village or do they just “off” the problems so they can live in their fantasy?
It is up to us conservatives not to fund Hollywood. Every penny you give the media conglomerates will be used against your beliefs and interests. There are better things to do than consume Big Media’s regurgitated tripe.
Several have already pointed out that Obama is unlikely to criticize those who provide him with piles of cash. But, why should he bother? He’s not interested in reducing violence, gun based or otherwise. He is interested in confiscating guns. That objective will not be achieved by reducing violence, he actually needs much more of it.
The enemedia supported his cover story.
There’s not going to be any way out of total war with these people. And it’s going to be soon, if you don’t want to just curl up and die.
This is the same as claiming water is wet. Takes no guts at all to say especially since they don't believe it.
I know this was a throw away line for the poofter. But like I said, he did say something right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.