Bankster globalists eh? Maybe, maybe not.
So the communists that have; first and foremost taken over our education system, secondly taken over our main stream media, and lastly taken over our government, are just usefull tools of the banksters aye? Right along with the muslim supremacists I guess? Phssst. Maybe the communists and muslim supremacists are just letting the banksters use them to gain controll. After all, the common goal of these groups to dismantle America do conveniently converge, do they not? Maybe the communists and muslim supremacists are just letting the banksters think they're using them, when the communists and muslims are really using the banksters. I'm pretty sure communists and muslims have they're own designs on America that absoutley do not include the globalist banksters. And the communists and muslims have many, MANY more foot soldiers to do their bidding than the globalist banksters I would think.~
Sounds crazy right ?
Some food for thought...
Wall Street backed the Bolsheviks.
Why would big capitalist monopolists actually want a statist government in power ?
How did Trotsky get from the U.S. to Russia when the revolution broke out when he had no passport ?
Lenin and Trotsky brought some money with them to Russia when the Revolution broke out...
Revolutions always need funding.
Investments were made in the USSR throughout the Cold War.
The Council on Foreign Relations is the the means by which U.S. foreign policy is controlled. Check out CFR’s early history.
Wall Street has controlled the boards of directors of newspapers since the early 1900’s.
Education: yes, the intercollegiate socialist society - 1905 was making plans. However banksters realized that the top universities are the pinnacle of the whole system. They send their kids there as well as anyone they want to work for them. The Ivy Leage sets the direction of education.
These guys put a lot into endowments and foundations. Carnegie, Rockefeller are the biggies. The bankster statists always want to avoid tax, and these foundations can work on helping get things done for them and the capital can be invested but grow tax free.
Wars and revolutions galore in the 20th century, all requiring government borrowing and presenting the opportunity to get government working for them.
They want to merge all governments into one that they put into place. The only one where the population might really put up a fuss is America. China and Russia are already run by elites; they can do business there with a captive market. Europeans gave into union, they could be merged easily from there. The muslim countries are no problem to merge. Those “revolutions” were all backed by the one world government program (just read CFR’s material and the State Departments and the Soros foundations material).
The whole 20th century, the banksters backed the collectivist revolutionaries or governments; they use whatever local wackos they can who want to lead the government. If the guy gets too annoying, one of their “guys” (Harvard, etc.) winds up “going home” and “leading his nation”. Nazism did much business with a few Wall Street firms. General Electric is an arm, they had a German subsidiary. The muzzies will get a rude awakening if one world government happens. How would Stalin or Hitler tolerate them ? How do the Chinese tolerate problems ?
Wilson - their guy.
FDR - their guy (deep roots)
Truman - played ball
Ike - Their man
Kennedy - played ball
Johnson - played ball; they dumped him
the list goes on...
The same CFR “advisors” show up across 2 and 3 decades. Albright first worked for Carter.
It would seem silly if it wasn’t so illegitimate and tragic.
They’re just working on America, and the only real resistors are getting older every day.
The under-40 crowd will fold unless they are clued in.
IMHO, we don’t have much time left.