I’d say the ‘womens body’ issue is already moot, and should be argued with the following points:
1) The child is its own being, egg from mom, sperm from dad. It is no longer a ‘part’ of mom to do with as she wishes. Great fine/prison term for knowingly harming the same.
2) There is already a lengthy, and expensive, setup for adoption of those already in the system. Why not make the process easier and/or adoptive parents work with the expectant mother (room/board/care/eduction/etc.) until the child is born.
2) If paternal rights are given up when a women no longer wishes the baby, the reverse should also be true: No $$ from daddy. Even up the obligation rights and soon enough the consequences have actions (lower rate); shack up just to shack up doesn’t mean easy abortion and poss. no $$ from ‘donor’
unfortunatly the courts do not see it that way. The fetus is the body of woman UNLESS there is an argument for independent viability.
by creating an artificial womb, the lack of independent viability is no longer a shield for feminists.
If anything, a fetus could be adopted while in the artificial womb. Abortions would shift to fetus adoption with the mother giving up her rights.
It would change the entire dynamic of the legal argument.
A nightmare scenario for those few feminazis.