Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy

>>. He was a poor candidate who did not attract attention or votes. He lost.
And you want to blame us?<<

Agree 100% And he lost for not being Conservative enough! How sad that But for a few worm-eaters we would have obozocare repealed.

We need the BEST and MOST CONSERVATIVE candidates we can get (see my post about my guy Ted Cruz).

But I 100% guarantee NO ONE will meet the FR “R U CNRVTV ENUF” test. NO ONE!

So we need to understand that the Scott Browns are sometimes the best we can do (like my 1st HS g/f). If you can get and run a Ted Cruz, GREAT!! Do it!

If not, it is time to settle for the lesser of all evils: The lowest RINO is 1,000% better than the most moderate liberal.


12 posted on 01/22/2013 10:06:29 AM PST by freedumb2003 (I learned everything I needed to know about racism from Colin Powell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: freedumb2003
Well, I do understand that you are talking to certain people, and I don't take that personally because I know you are not talking to me -- I voted for Scott Brown and I voted for Mitt Romney. I did my duty.

But a lot of people are like me. We vote for people who are not perfect. You know that a lot of people who voted for McCain were not voting for McCain -- they were voting for Sarah. The TV was filled with hate for Sarah. We were constantly told how flawed she was. Definitely not "perfect". But an awful lot of people rushed out on election day, eager to vote for her because, even with her flaws, she was the real deal.

The GOP has two paths:

1) Tell the voters to jump on the bandwagon and support anyone the Establishment picks for them.
2) Break away from the GOP-e mindset, find a candidate -- even if flawed -- who can excite the base.

We've been doing option #1 for a long, long time. And I'm tired of the voters taking in the shorts when it turns out that option #1 is a bad option. Maybe -- just maybe -- the GOP should develop a tolerance for Conservative candidates, even if those candidates have flaws. I mean -- Herman Cain? Do you realize was a small, petty, insignificant thing was used to get him out of the race?? The GOP does not stand up for anyone who isn't "perfect". Mitt Romney sure seemed "perfect". How did that work out?

My view is that the voters will embrace imperfection -- but the GOP will not. And that's the problem.

17 posted on 01/22/2013 10:19:40 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Nothing will change until after the war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson