Skip to comments.Hillary vs. Rand Paul
Posted on 01/24/2013 6:54:51 AM PST by SeekAndFind
I was unavailable to watch most of the farcical testimony given today by Mrs. Clinton, but I did catch the exchange with Sen. Rand Paul near the end, and it is fascinating, not only for the content of the exchange, but primarily for the look on her face her tone of voice as she reacts to the question:
Sen. Paul: Is the U. S. involved with any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya?
Mrs. Clinton: To Turkey? I will have to take that question for the record. Nobody has ever raised that with me.
Sen. Paul: It's been in news reports that ships have been leaving from Libya and that may have weapons and what I'd like to know is the Annex that was close by, were they involved with procuring, buying, selling, obtaining weapons and were any of these weapons being transferred to other countries, any countries, Turkey included?
Mrs. Clinton: Well, Senator, you'll have to direct that question to the agency that ran the Annex. I will see what information is available.
Sen. Paul: You're saying you don't know?
Mrs. Clinton: I do not know. I don't have any information on that.
I have written extensively on these pages here, here, here, here, and here about the gunrunning operation, and it is inconceivable that Mrs. Clinton would be unaware, at least, that the issue exists let alone that that is what this whole fiasco is all about.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
IMHO, that exchange is the one from her testimony that is going to leave the biggest mark in the end.
Of course she knows all about it. She just got up there and lied under oath like we all knew she would. They need to have facts to present to her that will catch her in her lies.
Well, it depends on what the definition of “IS” is.
Thanks for your work on this.
Oops. Sorry. Meant to credit YOU for all the work you’ve done on this. Mea culpa.
Well, it depends on what the definition of IS is.
So true. They love to skate around the literal to avoid responsibility.
“I don’t know” is the same defense she used a few years ago isn’t it? Its a typical Lawyer evasion. She knew! She was complicit. She is guilty of lying under oath. And she will probably skate clear once again. After all, she is a Progressive Democrat and a Clinton!! Does anyone think that the written records of her State Department stewardship will suddenly turn up on a table top somewhere in Foggy Bottom on a slow news weekend?
Her evasive answer elicits flashbacks to her Rose Law Firm grand jury testimony.
Rush should dust off the old “I don’t recall” spoof he played then. She and her lying husband are experts at uttering falsehoods with gusto.
The TV in my kitchen was on all day and I kept passing through on my way to get snacks and pee. So I would see one and two minute segments, maybe an hour apart all day. The thing I noticed was that Hill started out with the voice tone of a 20-year-old, and the voice kept getting lower and lower all day, until it was her normal, natural baritone by mid-afternoon. I guess Burson-Marsteller speaker training only goes so far...
Vince Foster has been heavy on my mind. Wish they could call him in as a witness.
LOL! He DID! He played it yesterday! (Song is to melody of “Try to Remember”)
Hillary in song referring to her memory:
Hillary vs. Rand
I am sure we will one or both in the 2015 pres race.
The Exchange between Hillary and Rand so makes me wanna see both of them fight each other in a Presidential debate, I think Rand would hand Hillary her own Fat Arse on Big Ol’ Platter back to her. Rand is not intimidated by the Hilde-beast.
I know that, you know that and God in heaven know that but to coin a phrase....”What difference does it make”??? (paraphrasing). Hellary and her pervert-in-chief know they don’t have to tell the truth......never have, never will. The corrupt media cover their tails and have their backs when a dust blows up around these two. My heart hurts when I think of 2016 because the dumbing down of America has come full circle and those two are going for the carcass. It’s their time once again. Lord help us all.
I was one of the first to post on FR about this potentially being a gun running operation via Turkey/Libya and that Ambassador Stevens was most likely hip deep in this operation. Always smelled that there was more to this story than met the eye, and why the Ambassador was meeting with a Turkish diplomat the day of 9/11, before he was done in that day. What a day to go to Benghazi, unless it was for an important meeting regarding gun running with a Turkish ship having just recently pulled into port nearby. Connect the dots. Glad Rand Paul did.
When shrillary gave her “testimony” she was not under oath. This was merely kabuki theatre for the uninformed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.