Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"As a female vet, I liked to think of myself as pretty tough. However, I am not foolish enough to think that I can, as a combatant hold my own. Can I kill? Yep. Can I run a tank if necessary? Yes. But not carrying the same weight as my male peers is not only a distraction, it dumbs down the mission and puts everyone at risk. What if I got captured? The likelihood of rape and other abuses would go without saying. Are my risks any different than an every day one? You bet they are. And my male peers put themselves at risk to protect me. In every situation I would expect nothing less, but this is beyond the pal".
1 posted on 01/25/2013 7:15:31 AM PST by NKP_Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: NKP_Vet

wait til our wives\moms\daughters start coming through Dover...


2 posted on 01/25/2013 7:18:25 AM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

The feminazis need the slaughtered body of a female combatant to build a cult around, especially one who wasn’t raped . . . Jessica Lynch didn’t help when she told of being raped repeatedly by her capturers . . . they couldn’t build an industry around that . . . they need evidence of a female being mowed down or killed so they can start flapping their jaws.

The libtards want to be as ruthless to women soldiers as they are to the unborn and newly born. And the more dead women’s bodies brought through Dover, the better for their agenda.

They’re a bunch of worthless, sick bastards.


3 posted on 01/25/2013 7:25:14 AM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
Just as allowing gays in the military has become a litmus test for human decency...

Oh, really? Since when is an appetite for sexual perversion a standard for human decency, and since when is the litmus test for our military centered around that...oh, wait...it's the "new normal".

4 posted on 01/25/2013 7:25:49 AM PST by TADSLOS ( "I ask sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few politicians."-George Mason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
not carrying the same weight as my male peers is not only a distraction, it dumbs down the mission and puts everyone at risk

that is one of the primary reasons why obozo ordered it.

5 posted on 01/25/2013 7:26:53 AM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Military and Society Threatened by Women in Combat


Since the job of the military is to protect our borders, I can see why they would feel that way.

I’m 59 and have not hit the gym in four years. I honestly believe you could put pretty much any female body builder in front of me and, if necessary, I could break her arm off in arm wrestling.

Women simply do not have the muscle and bone mass of men - generally speaking. Not to mention the constitution for grabbing a quick sandwich while your hands are covered in the dry blood of the guy you gutted a couple hours ago.


6 posted on 01/25/2013 7:30:29 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I’ll never forget the video shot of a female soldier running from a helicopter landing with her male partners while she was holding her helmet on her head with one hand.

Can you imagine her jumping into a fox hole with your son, while holding her hand on her helmet, probably with him holding her rifle so she doesn’t drop it.

Or hows’ ‘bout the so-called female office in the Grenada invasion who was so upset at the noise and commotion around her that she sat in her jeep while she cried?

Dover will be quite busy, and the feminists will applaud.

Well, they have the homosexuals in the showers and in the bunks next to your sons now with NO restrictions, so much so that they can parade in D.C. while hugging and kissing each other, and now they can have the little honeys being subject to combat and the resultant slaughter.

Good God Almighty . . . what has America turned into?


7 posted on 01/25/2013 7:33:33 AM PST by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I can see how the military could be threatened, but how is society threatened by this?


8 posted on 01/25/2013 7:35:41 AM PST by stuartcr ("I upraded my moral compass to a GPS, to keep up with the times.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

“But, but...We just wanted a LITTLE bit of feminism. This goes too far!”

/slippery slope


11 posted on 01/25/2013 7:46:52 AM PST by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Amen!


13 posted on 01/25/2013 8:05:56 AM PST by cotton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

Liberals hate the military. It’s because they hate their country. They know that it’s not politically feasable right now to eliminate the military entirely, so they castrate it and turn it into an ineffective force.


16 posted on 01/25/2013 8:22:07 AM PST by I want the USA back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet
Could there be a reason 'liberals' want to weaken our soldiers in combat?

Or a reason why they would destroy our reserve currency status by abusing the ability to print money? Or compromise the deterrent effectiveness of having stockpiles of nuclear weapons by unilaterally disarming?

Yes, there are reasons...

23 posted on 01/25/2013 9:26:42 AM PST by GOPJ ( Do murder laws control murders?..freeper Red Badger Let's try Criminal control - Fr:MadMax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I fail to see how putting females on the front line of a battlefield could somehow change the dynamics of war to our favor.

“We are five days away from fundamentally changing America...” were the words spoken by Obama in 2008. Those desperately seeking the hope and change he promised gave little thought to what those words truly meant.

What we are seeing happen to our military is all part of that bastards corrupt and treasonist plan for America, his dream...... his America.

I love women, I’ve been married to one for over 40 years. ;>)

Anyone wanting to see just how tough, relentless, deadly and focussed for battle a woman can be.... divorce one. But, we don’t NEED them on the battle field.


27 posted on 01/25/2013 9:49:34 AM PST by Gator113 (Leave my guns alone and REGISTER THE DAMN LIBERALS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NKP_Vet

I don’t see how this is good for women. It may be good for a few ambitious female officers who want to move up the ranks and be on the Joint Chiefs. Any captured female soldier is going to be raped. It’s a gimme. Yes, male soldiers can be raped, too, especially if you got homosexuals in the ranks. It’s ironic that a few months ago democrats were outraged by the supposedly republican war on women. For weeks the only word coming out of the jackass’s mouth was rape, rape, rape, and how terrible the Republicans were for being so insensitive. Phony, sick, jackass perverts.


28 posted on 01/25/2013 10:13:26 AM PST by virgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson