Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court to Obama: What Part of ‘The’ Do You Not Understand?
CNSNews ^ | January 25, 2013 | Terence P. Jeffrey

Posted on 01/25/2013 2:13:55 PM PST by jazusamo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: cripplecreek

Law abiding Senators and Representatives should request, in conference, the impeachment, by the House, and the conviction, by the Senate, of President Barak Hussein Obama for this egregious violation of the document that he swore an oath to preserve, protect, and defend. If that is not a high crime, nothing is?


22 posted on 01/25/2013 2:53:13 PM PST by eeriegeno (<p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle

I believe so, I noticed several typos in the piece.


23 posted on 01/25/2013 2:55:17 PM PST by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Lets hope they apply that same measure to “...shall not be infringed”

From Dictionary.com
in·fringe [in-frinj] Show IPA verb, in·fringed, in·fring·ing.
verb (used with object)
1.
to commit a breach or infraction of; violate or transgress: to infringe a copyright; to infringe a rule.
verb (used without object)
2.
to encroach or trespass (usually followed by on or upon ): Don’t infringe on his privacy.


24 posted on 01/25/2013 2:58:12 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: jazusamo

“I saw that right after I posted this article, this is going to get interesting.”

Why interesting? Wouldn’t holder be the one to act on the court’s ruling? Who do you think in DC has any balls or authority to prevent obama and the nlrb from moving ahead and ignoring the court?


26 posted on 01/25/2013 3:41:13 PM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Who do you think in DC has any balls or authority to prevent obama and the nlrb from moving ahead and ignoring the court?

Probably nobody in DC but maybe its time for the states to start announcing that they intend to ignore court rulings until order is restored. I would make it very clear that this is the kind of chaos Obama is inciting.
27 posted on 01/25/2013 3:48:54 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: freeangel

You’re right..DOJ already released statement:
Appointments “Constitutionally Sound”
Did you expect anything less from this POS administration, they’re just going to ignore ruling & dare the GOP to try to stop.

The GOP better grow a set & not lay down on this one but considering what we’ve seen with Boner & gang, that’s wishful thinking. Only hope is the States.


28 posted on 01/25/2013 3:56:30 PM PST by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rainee

Also, for the legal eagles..

Can SCOTUS refuse to take case? Does it depend on who is next in line to review? If court does take & split decision, then appeals is upheld, correct?


29 posted on 01/25/2013 4:02:32 PM PST by rainee (Her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

“This is where states need to step forward and declare the NLRB a rogue and illegal organization.”

OR the House can underfund the NLRB’s operation. Seriously underfund it.


30 posted on 01/25/2013 4:03:13 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

hahaahha at 7:12pm, Levin said that same thing: defund them


31 posted on 01/25/2013 4:19:27 PM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

“OR the House can underfund the NLRB’s operation. Seriously underfund it.”

Seriously, this is where conservatives wear myopic glasses. Not all laws are generated from the fascist federal government. States and localities can generate laws as effective, mean and soul-shattering as the pig federal government.

If stupid conservatives understood that, we could take back the country in three months or less.


32 posted on 01/25/2013 4:27:45 PM PST by sergeantdave (The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

It’s a start - now if we can nail Obama for illegally bankrupting the bondholders in his GM takeover, illegally violating courtorders to lift moratoria on Gulf oil drillig, illegally changing the definitions of work in the Welfare laws, and ignoring his duties in enforcing the immigration laws, we’ve got a strong case on impeachment for abuse of power......


33 posted on 01/25/2013 4:58:23 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Someone should arrest the illegal, union-loving Board. They hate the Constitution. Commodity bastar*s.


34 posted on 01/25/2013 5:06:05 PM PST by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ogen hal

The states should ignore NLRB dictates.


35 posted on 01/25/2013 5:10:27 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

ICE agents won a ruling against Obama today.

>>Ten U.S. immigration officers won a court ruling allowing them to challenge an Obama administration directive that lets some undocumented immigrants who arrived in the country as children avoid deportation.<<

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-25/agents-can-challenge-u-s-deferred-deportation-plan.html


36 posted on 01/25/2013 5:13:35 PM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo; holdonnow

Good job Mark.


37 posted on 01/25/2013 5:16:42 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
A vacancy that does not happen “during the Recess” cannot be filled by a recess appointment, said the judge.

Most of the discussion has been about whether the Senate was in recess at the time the appointments were made but I would argue that the above quotation is the most important aspect of this ruling. Congress was essentially a part time body when the Constitution was adopted and this provision was included to provide for continuity of government functions when the Senate was not physically present to consider appointments. When the Congress became a full time body, this provision became essentially meaningless.

38 posted on 01/25/2013 5:50:02 PM PST by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ogen hal

Commodity should be communist...da** auto correct on Fire.


39 posted on 01/25/2013 6:18:16 PM PST by ogen hal (First amendment or reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: etcb

I agree with you in total.

If this ruling is appealed to SCOTUS and upheld it will return recess appointments to the original intention which will in effect negate them. Only under very specific circumstances could they be implemented in the future.


40 posted on 01/25/2013 6:21:07 PM PST by jazusamo ("Mercy to the guilty is cruelty to the innocent." -- Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson