Skip to comments.NOEL CANNING v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Posted on 01/26/2013 8:09:20 AM PST by libstripper
SENTELLE, Chief Judge: Noel Canning petitions for review of a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board)decision finding that Noel Canning violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at sblog.s3.amazonaws.com ...
Read most of it. Fascinating.
I guess, after reading the order, it all comes down to what you believe the word “the” is!
Daffynitens can be where it’s all at.
One could make the case the recess appointment clause really isn’t relevant in current times. It was designed for a time when the legislature was part time and didn’t have modern transportation and communication mechanisms. If something is important enough, the house and senate can round everybody up in a heart beat to take a vote on the issue.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.