Skip to comments.
NOEL CANNING v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
amazonaws.com (D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals) ^
| January 25, 2013
| D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals
Posted on 01/26/2013 8:09:20 AM PST by libstripper
SENTELLE, Chief Judge: Noel Canning petitions for review of a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or the Board)decision finding that Noel Canning violated section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act . . .
(Excerpt) Read more at sblog.s3.amazonaws.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nlrb; obama; recessappointments
For those of you who are interested in the D. C. Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in this remarkable case, here's the full text of that decision. It's a remarkable, wonderful exercise in original intent jurisprudence.
Read most of it. Fascinating.
posted on 01/26/2013 8:42:21 AM PST
(Never laugh at live dragons)
I guess, after reading the order, it all comes down to what you believe the word “the” is!
posted on 01/26/2013 8:50:51 AM PST
(108th MI Group.....68-71)
Daffynitens can be where it’s all at.
One could make the case the recess appointment clause really isn’t relevant in current times. It was designed for a time when the legislature was part time and didn’t have modern transportation and communication mechanisms. If something is important enough, the house and senate can round everybody up in a heart beat to take a vote on the issue.
posted on 01/26/2013 4:02:04 PM PST
by EVO X
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson