To: Alter Kaker
posted on 01/26/2013 9:36:17 AM PST
(Welcome to Obamaville)
Why would Wikipedia want to take the conodont (not conodate) off their list? The hoax you've so cleverly used as evidence disputing the Theory of Evolution has nothing to do with the validity of the cladistics of conodonts, but only that someone was lying about the provenance of some fossils. And how was this fraud detected? Why through science, of course. By demonstrating that the geological setting claimed could not have produced those remains, evolutionary theory is strengthened, not weakened. Care to play again?
posted on 01/26/2013 10:03:47 AM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson