Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breaking: Obama on TV now with police chiefs supporting gun control, confiscation
Fox News Live (no link) | 1/28/13

Posted on 01/28/2013 8:51:58 AM PST by pabianice

'We are serious about limiting access to assault weapons and magazine clips [sic]. Joe and my cabinet members are on board with the necessity of confronting this issue to ensure no events like Sandy Hook happen again and the gun violence like in Chicago is addressed. This involves enforcement of existing laws. It involves addressing access to guns in big cities. I know this is not a shy group and I am very grateful to them, a representative group of communities across the country. Congress will be making decisions on what groups like this decide.' (all quickly paraphrased)

Ends. takes no questions from shouting reporters.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 113th; banglist; bho44; bhobanglist; bhofascism; bloodoftyrants; corruption; cw2; cwii; democrats; guncontrol; gungrabbers; leo; obama; secondamendment; tyranny; wewillnotcomply; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
No pro-gun groups need apply.
1 posted on 01/28/2013 8:52:04 AM PST by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pabianice

2 posted on 01/28/2013 8:54:30 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Does it surprise anyone that he has scripted this “meeting” by filling it full of people who want to disarm us? No different than any other “meeting” he has set up. What a crock!


3 posted on 01/28/2013 8:54:56 AM PST by Ab Alius Domitor ("In the end; the winner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
yeah agree...
same old...same old...Political Police Endosed Statists...
every election cycle..Move along.

4 posted on 01/28/2013 8:55:04 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,spend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Bozo man can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
CoPs are typically 'rats appointed by 'rats.

Support you local elected Sheriff.

5 posted on 01/28/2013 8:55:04 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
CoPs are typically 'rats appointed by 'rats.

Support your local elected Sheriff.

6 posted on 01/28/2013 8:55:39 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

odd that he should mention chicago, home of some of the harshest gun control measures in the country, and one of the few places on earth more dangerous than fallujah was in it’s heyday.


7 posted on 01/28/2013 8:55:52 AM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Police have no duty to protect us and we aren’t supposed to protect ourselves.


8 posted on 01/28/2013 8:56:10 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

start by confiscating guns and nullifying the 2d amendment in the cities with the highest murder rates? Folks don’t need to bring guns to a knife fight, eh barry?

Look out Holder’s people your messiah and his civilian army is coming for your guns!

(as if...the first target of the communists will be the bitter clingers with NRA membership)


9 posted on 01/28/2013 8:56:41 AM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Obama’s occupying forces intend to smash the resistance first thing.


10 posted on 01/28/2013 8:57:25 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

except in Rhode Island


11 posted on 01/28/2013 8:57:30 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The conversation on “gun control” should go something like this:

No, you don’t want “reasonable” gun control, you want confiscation.
We say “No”. End of discussion.


12 posted on 01/28/2013 8:58:53 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

He plans on an Executive Order. Oh, and he will do it.


13 posted on 01/28/2013 8:59:23 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Take a mental note who the gun grabbers are for future operations.

Eight Deuce on the loose!

14 posted on 01/28/2013 8:59:44 AM PST by paratrooper82 (82nd ABN Div. 1/508th BN "Fury From the Sky")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Police have no duty to protect us and we aren’t supposed to protect ourselves.
15 posted on 01/28/2013 9:01:16 AM PST by DCBryan1 (Dear Congress Critter: Help create jobs and support RKBA by repealing 18 USC 922 (o).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I don’t really watch FoxNews anymore, but twice while flipping by the network I noted the anchors adopting the left’s “effort to curb gun violence” phrase instead of “gun control.” That, and they seem equally on-board with amnesty now. Quite a change from a few years ago when they actually had Greta and their newspeople actually travel right to the border and interview citizens being overrun. Man, but FoxNews isn’t what it once was.


16 posted on 01/28/2013 9:06:42 AM PST by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

The guy is dead set on starting CWII. Personally I think he’s going to succeed.


17 posted on 01/28/2013 9:08:06 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

He could and may, with a stroke of a EO pen, make a large chunk of his opposition criminals, unless they surrender their arms, in which case they can be brutalized in some even more intrusive, abusive, politically polarizing and offensive way.


18 posted on 01/28/2013 9:15:05 AM PST by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dforest

Wouldn’t it be fun to watch Obama gather all those big city police chiefs into one large conference room where he solemnly issues an Executive Order declaring, “Guns designated as assault weapons are now illegal & must be turned in immediately. I hereby empower the police officials gathered here to carry out active confiscation of illegal weapons by any & all means necessary.”

Pause. Then, “Gentlemen, those are my orders! Dismissed!”

That’s what he’d like to do, JMHO.


19 posted on 01/28/2013 9:17:26 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Gun control in Chicago is a joke, there never is an effort to seriously disarm the already law breaking black and hispanic drug gangs, never. To do so would upset blacks and hispanics, so this rhetoric is aimed at the bitter clinging white gun owning somewhat conservative voter so as to make white libs and thier racialist colored cohorts feel superior. Gun control in Illinois is a clown show basically little better than “White Privelege Studies” with a little gun jargon thrown in for measure. Its why the NRA and others wisely chose to put black men up in the legal cases.


20 posted on 01/28/2013 9:18:33 AM PST by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Aside: I had heard about this photo, but had not paid attention. Seeing your post reminded me of the origin of “Lord of the Flies”. That is the translation into English of Beelzebub! :)


21 posted on 01/28/2013 9:20:17 AM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: junta

This POS means disarming white conservatives and nothing else, so literally we are having the 1870s Reconstruction civil rights debates but this time its about those dangerous crackers owning implements of self defense Also the article I link to is about a man who helped start and nurture the violent Zebra cult dedicated to the genocide of whites.

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2013/01/28/farrakhan-right-to-bear-arms-an-outdated-concept/


22 posted on 01/28/2013 9:26:50 AM PST by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Well, Dictator Obama, I strongly disagree with your dictates and have every faith that your illegal actions will be overturned, so I am going to continue as I am today under the protection of the constitution, which limits you, and not me.


23 posted on 01/28/2013 9:27:14 AM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf
Look out Holder’s people your messiah and his civilian army is coming for your guns!

(as if...the first target of the communists will be the bitter clingers with NRA membership)

It's NOT Holder's "people" who Obozo will be disarming. They will be going after law abiding citizens, not the criminals.

24 posted on 01/28/2013 9:27:51 AM PST by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
Ends. takes no questions from shouting reporters.

Shouting reporters?? That would be a first for this President.
They normally sit like little children waiting for the teacher to speak.
Beezle, "You can quote me"
Reporters in unison,"Yeees teacher"

25 posted on 01/28/2013 9:28:05 AM PST by Vinnie (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I come from a family with a lot of police...cops are NOT, as a rule, pro 2nd Amendment. Especially their brass! If the call ever goes out to confiscate guns there will be no hesitation on their part to move on gun owners...swat teams and all.


26 posted on 01/28/2013 9:29:34 AM PST by pgkdan ( "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Look for a second American civil war to happen.


27 posted on 01/28/2013 9:36:22 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

He plans on an Executive Order. Oh, and he will do it.

There will be a backlash and it won’t be pretty.


28 posted on 01/28/2013 9:36:45 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Obama is so arrogant and puffed up with hubris that he will attempt this.

The question is, “what will people do about it”? I think he figures, not much.


29 posted on 01/28/2013 9:37:08 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

Obama is so arrogant and puffed up with hubris that he will attempt this.

The question is, “what will people do about it”? I think he figures, not much.


30 posted on 01/28/2013 9:39:33 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

The guy is dead set on starting CWII. Personally I think he’s going to succeed.

Actually it would be Civil War Numbero 4.

Civil War #1 = American Revolution
Civil War #2 = War of 1812
Civil War #3 = The first so called “civil war”
Civil War #4 = War on the Constitution, will be a lot like the First one.


31 posted on 01/28/2013 9:41:58 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
again, we see Law Enforcement Personnel advacating and demanding that Americans individual rights be curtailed and eliminated by the government!

DO NOT TRUST LEO EVER! You cannot serve two masters, for you will love the one, and hate the other! Clearly, LEO have chosen which master they will and are serving!

Eight Deuce on the loose!

32 posted on 01/28/2013 9:47:35 AM PST by paratrooper82 (82nd ABN Div. 1/508th BN "Fury From the Sky")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
BTTT

HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINE BAN for WHAT?

WHY does anyone NEED an ASSAULT RIFLE?

REAL Assault Rifles vs Gun Grabber Myths

Dear Mr. Security Agent: A letter to law enforcement

33 posted on 01/28/2013 9:48:03 AM PST by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dforest

If I were a conservative judge on SCOTUS I would check my life insurance carefully. If he can appoint 1 or 2 more judges he can do ANYTHING and make it stick..


34 posted on 01/28/2013 9:53:42 AM PST by Kozak (The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

“If the call ever goes out to confiscate guns there will be no hesitation on their part to move on gun owners...swat teams and all.”

When confronted by mobs throwing bricks and bottles, the entire LA police department hopped in their squads and drove home to protect their families.


35 posted on 01/28/2013 10:01:22 AM PST by sergeantdave (The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

‘I come from a family with a lot of police...cops are NOT, as a rule, pro 2nd Amendment. Especially their brass! If the call ever goes out to confiscate guns there will be no hesitation on their part to move on gun owners...swat teams and all.”

And when I was growing up, a couple of Sheriff’s deputies in our family, not all, had the lowest morals of any I have ever met. And complete control freaks. They were not patriotic, just on a complete power trip.


36 posted on 01/28/2013 10:08:08 AM PST by selfdefense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

#4 is #1 with a 2 added.


37 posted on 01/28/2013 10:10:05 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

If every judge in America decided that infringing on bearing arms was constitutional it wouldn’t make it so. The constitution means what says, not what judges say it means. There is no valid difference between Obama making a executive order striking down the 2nd amendment or the USSC doing it.


38 posted on 01/28/2013 10:16:41 AM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Civil war was Americans fighting each other. Revolution I was about breaking away from British government control.

Revolution II will be Americans breaking away from government tyranny and control.


39 posted on 01/28/2013 10:16:58 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

There are some 160,000 people in my county with under 200 total police (county, local, and state). There are some 4 or 5 thousand CCW holders and probably another 50 to 60 thousand who own shotguns or rifles that never needed registration.


40 posted on 01/28/2013 10:24:55 AM PST by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Durus
If every judge in America decided that infringing on bearing arms was constitutional it wouldn’t make it so. The constitution means what says, not what judges say it means. There is no valid difference between Obama making a executive order striking down the 2nd amendment or the USSC doing it.

The 2nd Amendment of the Constitution means what the Declaration of Independence says it means.

41 posted on 01/28/2013 10:26:34 AM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

Yes actually it won’t be a Civil War it will be a Revolution.


42 posted on 01/28/2013 10:40:59 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: selfdefense

We had a sheriff’s election over a year ago and the incumbent sheriff had put a deputy in every school, kept the county safe and friendly for years and liked to help out black kids who went wrong before they went REALLY wrong. The new commonweath’s attorney decided it was time for this guy to go, hand picked his successor and pursecuted, smeared and demoralized this good servant of the people with the local media helping. The “new” guy got elected and immediately took the deputies out of the school because of cost...then the school board just GAVE every high school student in the county an iPad...
Our county, alongwith our country, is DOOMED!


43 posted on 01/28/2013 10:44:36 AM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
I come from a family with a lot of police...cops are NOT, as a rule, pro 2nd Amendment. Especially their brass! If the call ever goes out to confiscate guns there will be no hesitation on their part to move on gun owners...swat teams and all.

I have said as much here on several occasions, when people have said "LEOs won't go along with this."

There are no cops in my family (and I'm 100% Irish - go figure!), but I have absolutely no doubt that many, if not most, LEOs will not hesitate for a nanosecond, to confiscate guns, to arrest law-abiding citizens who happen to own suddenly "illegal" guns, or to participate in SWAT style raids (as if the old "No knock" drug raids, many of which have resulted in the injury or death of innocents, aren't already evidence enough of this).

44 posted on 01/28/2013 10:52:17 AM PST by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Paging Mr. Bowman. Will Henry Bowman please pick up the white courtesy phone?


45 posted on 01/28/2013 10:58:39 AM PST by atomic_dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

The declaration of independence does not reference the 2nd amendment either in principle or explicitly. The 2nd amdnement was adopted (along with the rest of the bill of rights) about 15 years after the declaration.


46 posted on 01/28/2013 11:15:09 AM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: atomic_dog

Paging Mr. Turner.Please contact Mr. Bowman


47 posted on 01/28/2013 11:20:14 AM PST by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Sicon
I have to disagree with you and pkgdan. I too come from a family of cops, both rural and in the capitol city. Sure, we would love to grab the guns from the knuckleheads, but we are very pro 2nd amendment for the honest citizen.
48 posted on 01/28/2013 11:24:04 AM PST by newbolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Durus
The declaration of independence does not reference the 2nd amendment either in principle or explicitly.

The DOI asserts the God given right to revolt. What are you going to throw off such a government with, a strongly worded letter? If patriots are to revolt, then yes, they will do so with arm which in principle they already have.

49 posted on 01/28/2013 11:24:58 AM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Durus
The declaration of independence does not reference the 2nd amendment either in principle or explicitly.

The DOI asserts the God given right to revolt. What are you going to throw off such a government with, a strongly worded letter? If patriots are to revolt, then yes, they will do so with arms which in principle they already have.

50 posted on 01/28/2013 11:25:18 AM PST by Sirius Lee (All that is required for evil to advance is for government to do "something")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson