Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/28/2013 11:19:57 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

DjDiFi Unchained.


2 posted on 01/28/2013 11:24:58 AM PST by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
I did read it and I am very convinced that it will never become law. This bill will not pass out current Senate much less the House.
KMA Fienstein. You can store a copy of your not passed legislation where the sun does not shine for the rest of your career.
3 posted on 01/28/2013 11:31:13 AM PST by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

She was close allies with Jim Jones, who killed 400 people in Guayana, and NO ONE in the liberal SF media called her on it.

The bodies were all over the place.

He was her FRIEND and political ally.


4 posted on 01/28/2013 11:35:00 AM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

This POS will never get out of committee much less be brought to the floor of the Senate for a vote.


6 posted on 01/28/2013 11:40:34 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Any such vague law would be used as an excuse to confiscate any weapon encountered by law enforcement.

You wouldn’t see it again for 3 years, while they “determine whether it violates any of the conditions”.

That’s if you’re lucky.

Screw compliance.


8 posted on 01/28/2013 11:53:08 AM PST by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

By posting a list of “legal” weapons in the bill, you imply that anything not on the list is “illegal”, whether it’s mentioned in the bill or not.


10 posted on 01/28/2013 11:54:28 AM PST by ZOOKER ( Exploring the fine line between cynicism and outright depression)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The handiwork of Jim Jones, San Fran DiFi supporter and backer:

Ah, but don't worry. I mean....THAT could never happen HERE, right...?

Right....?

13 posted on 01/28/2013 12:01:56 PM PST by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

> “a threaded barrel,”

Almost all guns have a threaded barrel (on the chamber end). Don’t think that they overlooked this.


14 posted on 01/28/2013 12:03:47 PM PST by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Pretty slick work Di, such a long bill. A long list.

All ready to go, “waiting” for the right time, were ya?


17 posted on 01/28/2013 12:33:46 PM PST by Bradís Gramma (Psalm 83)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Get this passed, DuFu, and the People With Rights lobby will work to pass a ban on ugly. Then whatcha gonna do?


18 posted on 01/28/2013 12:39:10 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Bookmarked.


22 posted on 01/28/2013 12:45:19 PM PST by Inyo-Mono (My greatest fear is that when I'm gone my wife will sell my guns for what I told her I paid for them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Note what Sec. 3 Paragraph (4) on page 15 reads:

Paragraph (1) shall not apply to— (A) the importation for, manufacture for, sale to, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State

That looks like legalese for saying that anyone who works in any capacity for the government would be exempted from this law. Those who work in a similar capacity in the private sector would be subject to it.

This goes beyond people in law enforcement, because although they are exempted too, their exemption is listed separately.

Subparagraph (C) reads that it also shall not apply to the possession, by an individual who is retired in good standing from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited

A retired police officer is no different that any other civilian. Yet, they, too would be allowed the kinds of weapons and magazines forbidden to the rest of us civilians.

36 posted on 01/28/2013 1:44:36 PM PST by raisetheroof ("To become Red is to become dead --- gradually." Alexander Solzhenitsyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Sen. John F. Kennedy’s statement, Know Your Lawmakers, Guns, April 1960, p. 4 (1960): “By calling attention to ‘a well regulated militia,’ the ‘security’ of the nation, and the right of each citizen ‘to keep and bear arms,’ our founding fathers recognized the essentially civilian nature of our economy. Although it is extremely unlikely that the fears of governmental tyranny which gave rise to the Second Amendment will ever be a major danger to our nation, the Amendment still remains an important declaration of our basic civilian-military relationships, in which every citizen must be ready to participate in the defense of his country. For that reason I believe the Second Amendment will always be important.”

Sen. Hubert Humphrey’s statement, Know Your Lawmakers, Guns, Feb. 1960, p. 4 (1960): “Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms. This is not to say that firearms should not be very carefully used and that definite safety rules of precaution should not be taught and enforced. But the right of citizens to bear arms is just one more guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against a tyranny which now appears remote in America, but which historically has proved to be always possible.”

http://www2.law.ucla.edu/volokh/2amteach/sources.htm


38 posted on 01/28/2013 2:12:59 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Here’s something to remember about the eventual compromises that will be offered and expected by Democrats to pass. Regulating bureaucrats, their NGO relatives and friends and relatives in social programs will continue to possess and use the firearms of their choosing. Producers will not. All gun control efforts must be defeated regardless of class considerations. The whole populace is watching, and votes in the near future will count.


41 posted on 01/28/2013 3:07:55 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

What’s a threaded barrel?

Next will be “assault murders” as a hate crime. If someone kills someone with an “assault” weapon they’ll get more punishment that someone who uses a shotgun.


42 posted on 01/28/2013 4:54:44 PM PST by Terry Mross (How long do we have?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Feinstein's New 'Assault Weapon' Ban: Read It and Sleep

Nunc Pro Tunc: The Coming Day of Burn Barrels and Blessings

45 posted on 01/28/2013 5:32:17 PM PST by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson