Skip to comments.Discovered papers: Hanoi directed Kerry 
Posted on 01/29/2013 3:19:13 AM PST by RaceBannon
memory hole reminder
The first documentary evidence that Vietnamese communists were directly steering John Kerrys group Vietnam Veterans Against the War has been discovered in a U.S. archive, according to a researcher who spoke with WorldNetDaily. Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2004/10/27207/#615wufvA5oZXKuWK.99
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Kerry insists he attended the talks only because he happened to be in France on his honeymoon and maintains he met with both sides. But previously revealed records indicate the future senator made two, and possibly three, trips to Paris to meet with Viet Cong leader Madame Nguyen Thi Binh then promote her plans demand for U.S. surrender.
Jerome Corsi, a specialist on the Vietnam era, told WND the new discoveries are the most remarkable documents Ive seen in the entire history of the antiwar movement.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2004/10/27207/#615wufvA5oZXKuWK.99
“At this point, what difference does it make?” /s
John Kerry and the VVAW: Hanoi’s American Puppets?
Newly discovered documents link Vietnam Veterans Against the War to Vietnamese communists
Two recently discovered documents captured from the Vietnamese communists during the Vietnam War strongly support the contention that a close link existed between the Hanoi regime and the Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW) while John Kerry served as the group’s leading national spokesman.
The Circular: International Coordination of Antiwar Propaganda
The first document is a 1971 “Circular” distributed by the Vietnamese communists within Vietnam. It discusses strategies to coordinate their national propaganda effort with their orchestration of the activities of sympathetic counterparts in the American anti-war movement. Specifically, the document notes that the Vietcong and North Vietnamese delegations to the Paris Peace talks were being used as the communications link to direct the activities of anti-war activists meeting with them in Paris. To quote from the document:
The spontaneous antiwar movements in the US have received assistance and guidance from the friendly ((VC/NVN)) delegations at the Paris Peace Talks.
— Circular on Antiwar Movements in the US. The reference to “VC” indicates the Vietcong; “NVN” is the North Vietnamese government.
This sentence is particularly important in light of John Kerry’s admission that he met with leaders of both communist delegations to the Paris Peace Talks in June 1970, including Madame Binh, foreign minister of the Provisional Revolutionary Government (PRG) of South Vietnam, also known as the Vietcong. FBI files record that Kerry returned to Paris to meet with the North Vietnamese delegation in August of 1971, and planned a third trip in November.
Prior to the discovery of the Circular, there was no direct evidence that Hanoi was actually steering the U.S. antiwar movement’s activities by conveying Hanoi’s goals and wishes to movement leaders during their frequent visits to Paris, though many investigators had assumed that to be the case. Further analysis of this document supports the contention that Madame Binh used her Paris meeting with John Kerry to instruct him on how he and the VVAW might best serve as Hanoi’s surrogates in the United States. In the spring and summer of 1971, a key strategy of Hanoi was to advance what was known as Madame Binh’s Seven Point Peace Plan.
The plan was cleverly constructed to force President Nixon to set a date to end the Vietnam War and withdraw American troops. According to the 7-Point Peace Plan of Madame Binh, the only barrier to Hanoi setting a date to release American Prisoners of War was President Nixon’s unwillingness to set a specific date for military withdrawal. Of course, accepting the full terms of the 7-Point Peace Plan would have amounted to an American capitulation, a virtual surrender that included the payment of reparations to the Vietnam communists as an admission that America was the wrongful aggressor in an immoral war.
A section of the Circular titled “PREPARATION FOR THE FALL ((1971)) ANTIWAR MOVEMENT” makes clear the importance the Vietnamese Communists placed on advancing Madame Binh’s 7-Point Peace Plan within the United States:
The seven-point peace proposal ((of the SVN Provisional Revolutionary Government)) not only solved problems concerning the release of US prisoners but also motivated the people of all walks of life and even relatives of US pilots detained in NVN to participate in the antiwar movement.
— Circular on Antiwar Movements in the US. “SVN” indicates the South Vietnam Provisional Revolutionary Government, i.e., the Vietcong. “NVN” refers to North Vietnam.
And again, highlighting how the Vietnamese communists viewed the activities of the US antiwar movement, US politics, and politics in South Vietnam as interconnected; all to be targeted by Madame Binh’s 7-Point Peace Plan:
The Nixon-Thieu clique is very embarrassed because the seven-point peace proposal is supported by the SVN people’s (( political struggle)) movement and the antiwar movements in the US. Therefore, all local areas, units, and branches must widely disseminate the seven-point peace proposal, step up the people’s ((political struggle)) movements both in cities and rural areas, taking advantage of disturbances and dissensions in the enemy’s forthcoming (RVN) Congressional and Presidential elections. They must coordinate more successfully with the antiwar movements in the US so as to isolate the Nixon-Thieu clique.
— Circular on Antiwar Movements in the US. “RVN” refers to the Republic of Vietnam, the government in South Vietnam supported by the US.
POW Families: Targets of the Vietnamese Communists
Late in 1970, a defecting Vietcong organizer described a communist plan to use Vietcong sympathizers in the US to recruit family members of American POWs held captive in North Vietnam. The following summary of his interview was provided to the House Foreign Affairs Committee:
The Viet Cong plan to continue their efforts to win worldwide opinion to their side and to solicit as much material support for the VC struggle as possible from other countries in order to create a favorable climate for the VC at the Paris Peace Conference.
The Viet Cong will continue to promote domestic unrest against the war in the United States in order to speed withdrawal of US troops and create pressure for an end to the war.
Efforts will be directed toward the US soldier in Vietnam to demand that they be returned to the US and be reunited with their families and wives.
The VC will strive to create anti-draft and anti-war attitudes in the US by organizing VC sympathizers in the US to contact families with sons in Vietnam and urge them to call their sons home. Also VC sympathizers in the US will be organized to distribute anti-draft leaflets to students and young people.
On February 1, 1971, at their Winter Soldier Investigation in Detroit, the VVAW released a statement by Virginia Warner, mother of American POW Jim Warner, urging President Nixon to “end the war so the prisoners of war can come home.” Jim Warner has accused John Kerry of exploiting his mother’s fears to obtain this statement.
On July 22, 1971, John Kerry held a press conference in Washington, DC, to call upon President Nixon to accept Madame Binh’s 7-Point Peace Plan. Kerry surrounded himself at the press conference with POW wives, parents and sisters who had been recruited to promote his message. The event was reported in The New York Times of July 23, 1971 and the communist Daily World of July 24, 1971. Each article included a photograph of Kerry surrounded by POW family members.
Kerry’s use of POW families directly advanced the North Vietnamese communist agenda as described by enemy defectors and in the newly discovered Circular, which suggests that Madame Binh had recommended the same course of action to antiwar activists meeting with her in Paris.
[Note: A number of POW families were contacted by a “liason” group headed by Cora Weiss, the daughter of Communist Party financier Samuel Rubin, with offers to provide mail and information about their husbands if the families agreed to publicly denounce the war. Most POW family members refused to cooperate with this extortion, even when promised better treatment for their husbands or sons in Hanoi. Four angry POW wives protested at Kerry’s July press conference, one of whom accused Kerry of “constantly using our own suffering and grief” to advance his political ambitions.]
The Directive: Supporting the US Domestic Insurgency
The second document, captured by US military forces in South Vietnam on May 12, 1972, is a communist Directive designed to motivate discussions within Vietnam about promoting the ongoing antiwar activities in the United States. The fifth paragraph of this document makes clear that the Vietnamese communists were utilizing for their propaganda purposes the activities of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War. The protest described as occurring from April 19 through April 22, 1971 coincides directly with the dates of Dewey Canyon III, the Washington, DC, protest led by John Kerry, during which John Kerry’s testimony before Senator Fulbright’s Foreign Relations Committee was a televised centerpiece. The description of the protest activities in the Directive even include the “return their medals” ceremony in which John Kerry and other VVAW members threw their medals and/or ribbons toward the steps of the US Capitol, with several shouting threats of violence against their government as they did so.
The Connection: The People’s Committee for Peace and Justice
Another key discussion in the documents reveals the degree to which the Vietnamese communists were working with and through the PCPJ (People’s Coalition for Peace and Justice. The Circular, immediately after disclosing how the communist delegations to the Paris Peace talks were being used to guide the US antiwar movement, stresses the importance of the PCPJ to these efforts:
Of the US antiwar movements, the two most important ones are: The PCPJ ((the People’s Committee for Peace and Justice)) and the NPAC ((National Peace Action Committee)). These two movements have gathered much strength and staged many demonstrations. The PCPJ is the most important. It maintains relations with us.
— Circular on Antiwar Movements in the US (emphasis added).
The House Internal Security Committee in its 1971 Annual Report described the PCPJ as an organization strongly controlled by US communists: “There is no question but what members of the Communist Party have provided a very strong degree of influence, even a guiding influence, in the evolution and formation of policies of the Peoples’ Coalition for Peace and Justice.”
Recently released FBI surveillance reports establish a strong link between John Kerry, Al Hubbard, the VVAW, the PCPJ, and their trips to Paris to meet with Madame Binh. As discussed in Unfit for Command, Hubbard, the Executive Secretary of the VVAW and a hard-line radical with ties to the Black Panthers and the PCPJ, had directly recruited John Kerry into the VVAW’s Executive Committee, bypassing the organization’s election process. Al Hubbard’s own claim to have been a transport pilot wounded in combat was discredited when the Department of Defense released documents demonstrating that, though Hubbard had been in the Air Force, he was neither a pilot nor an officer, had never served in Vietnam and had never been in combat. John Kerry shared the stage with Al Hubbard during the Dewey Canyon III protest in Washington, D.C., and he appeared together with Hubbard on NBC’s Meet the Press on April 18, 1971. Hubbard also signed the People’s Peace Treaty, a PCPJ document that reiterated the positions of North Vietnam and the Vietcong, on behalf of the VVAW.
An FBI field surveillance report stamped November 11, 1971 reported that the FBI had learned at the Regional VVAW Convention in Norman Oklahoma, on November 5-7, 1971, that John Kerry and Al Hubbard were planning to travel to Paris later in the month to engage in talks with the Vietnamese communist peace delegations. While this document is heavily redacted, other FBI reports make it clear that the Communist Party of the USA was paying for Al Hubbard’s trips to Paris.
IT IS NOTED THAT THE “COMMUNIST PARTY” REFERRED IN RETEL IS PROBABLY THE COMMUNIST PARTY, USA, BECAUSE AL HUBBARD IS A MEMBER OF COORDINATING OF PEOPLES COALITION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE (PCPJ), AS ARE GIL GREEN, MEMBER OF NATIONAL COMMITTEE, COMMUNIST PARTY, USA AND JARVIS TYNER, NATIONAL DIRECTOR, YOUNG WORKERS LIBERATION LEAGUE. HUBBARD, GREEN AND TYNER HAVE ATTENDED SAME NATIONAL MEETINGS OF PCPJ.
— Federal Bureau of Investigations, Field Surveillance Report, filed November 11, 1971. A copy of this report was air-mailed to the Boston FBI office in reference to John Kerry.
An FBI field surveillance report dated November 24, 1971 details Al Hubbard’s presentation to a VVAW meeting of the Executive and Steering committees in Kansas City, Missouri, during the weekend of November 12-15, 1971 — the same meeting at which the VVAW considered, then rejected a plan to assassinate several pro-war US Senators. John Kerry is listed as present. Once again, Al Hubbard made clear the communist coordination involved in his recent trip to Paris:
[BLACK OUT] advised that Hubbard gave the following information regarding his Paris trip:
Two foreign groups, which are Democratic Republic of Vietnam (DRV) and Peoples Republic Government (PRG) (phonetic), invited representatives of the VVAW, Communist Party USA (CP USA), and a Left Wing group in Paris, to attend meeting of the above inviting groups in Paris. Hubbard advised he was elected to represent the VVAW. An unknown male was invited to represent the CP USA and an unknown individual was elected to represent the Left Wing group from Paris. He advised at the meeting that his trip was financed by CP USA.
— Federal Bureau of Investigations, Field Surveillance Report, filed November 24, 1971.
A letter written by Al Hubbard on April 20, 1971 leaves no doubt about the strong coordination between the Vietnam Veterans Against the War and the People’s Coalition for Peace and Justice. Addressed from the offices of the VVAW in Washington, D.C., the letter is an appeal to VVAW members to provide assistance to the PCPJ. It discusses several ways in which the two organizations have worked closely together:
This is an appeal for help for the Peoples Coalition for Peace and Justice. Over the past months the Peoples Coalition has supported the Vietnam Vets Against the War in many ways. The Coalition has made office space available at no charge, and permitted the use of all necessary office equipment such as mimeograph machines, stencil-making machines, folders and typewriters. They have loaned us cars, bullhorns, and public address equipment. Their staff has taken messages for us and joined fraternally in building our progress. Now we can return this support.
Saturday, April 24, the Coalition needs help collecting money and selling buttons at the great march and rally. Collectors and sellers must be energetic and determined. Theree will be security problems in taking large amounts of money to banks. The Coalition needs people power, hundreds of workers.
I earnestly hope that you will come forward to support our friends in this emergency.
— Letter signed by Al Hubbard, addressed from the Vietnam Veterans Against the War office at Room 900, 1029 Vermont Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C., dated April 20, 1971. Found in the House Internal Security Committee subject files, Washington, D.C.
Two days after the letter was written, John Kerry gave his famous testimony to Senator Fulbright’s Foreign Relations Committee in which he likened the American military in Vietnam to the army of Ghengis Khan. The march and rally for which Hubbard was recruiting VVAW assistance was the PCPJ’s massive April 24 demonstration in Washington, which immediately followed the VVAW’s week-long Dewey Canyon III protest. The communist Daily world reported on April 27 that “Tributes were paid to the special role of the Vietnam Veterans” at the PCPJ rally, and went on to quote at length from John Kerry’s speech at that event.
Willing Partners: the VVAW and the Vietnamese Communists
Other examples of the VVAW’s advocacy of Vietnamese communist positions during the period of John Kerry’s leadership abound. The group issued a proclamation in February 1971 calling for mass civil disobedience and military mutiny if American forces entered Laos. After the war, North Vietnamese military leaders acknowledged that one of their greatest fears was that America would move significant forces into Laos to interdict the Ho Chi Minh Trail. The VVAW’s eagerness to comply with the wishes of the Vietnamese communists even extended to its choice of nomenclature. The VVAW’s Executive Committee stated in a July 1971 meeting that the terms “Vietcong” and “North Vietnamese” were not to be used in VVAW press releases and communications. Instead, “PRG (Provisional Revolutionary Government)” and “DRV (Democratic Republic of Vietnam)”... “are to be used by us to reflect our acceptance of their designations.” And the VVAW’s unremitting insistence that American forces were mass-murdering Vietnamese civilians perfectly echoed the primary propaganda theme put forth by the Vietnamese communists, their international communist allies, and their Soviet sponsors.
The newly uncovered documents help clarify the relationship of the North Vietnamese, the Vietcong, the PCPJ, the Communist Party of the USA, and John Kerry’s VVAW. They indicate that these organizations worked closely together, using the Paris Peace Talks as a central point of communication, to employ the strategy and tactics devised by the Vietnamese communists to achieve their primary objective: the defeat of the United States of America in Vietnam.
— by Jerome R. Corsi and Scott Swett
[Note 2: The authors wish to thank Max Friedman for making available two additional documents, first, Al Hubbard’s April 20, 1971 letter to the VVAW membership. The full citation is: National Peace Action Coalition (NPAC) and Peoples Coalition for Peace & Justice (PCPJ) Part I, hearings before the Committee on Internal Security, House of Representatives, 92nd Congress, First Session, May 18-21, 1971, p. 1796. The second document, “Extracts from an interview with a Viet Cong returnee” comes from the American Prisoners of War in Southeast Asia 1971 hearings before the Subcommittee on National Security Policy and Scientific Development, House Foreign Affairs Committee, 92nd Congress First Congress, March 23-25, 30-31, April 1, 6 & 20, 1971, Testimony of Max P. Friedman, pg 299.]
What’s difference will one more traitor in the White House make when the Communist-in-Chief is already running the show?
that’s a sad but true point
“At this point, what difference does it make? /s”
You are right. Most of you live in the new USSA.
Love it or leave it.
It appears that 50%+ of brainless morons love it.
Kerry is a traitor - sure - everyone knows this...look at the Clintons - but was anything really done to them...
Now the Media Matter’s guy apparently entered WASH DC with a armed bodyguard possessing weapons (illegal-felon) to meet with Fiensteing and others...
Zero has a solid record with every known anti-US personality out there...
Keep reporting - but until some elected leader does an official investigation where these idiots are arrested and charged - it seems the elite keep getting away with crimes the rest of us wouldn’t...
It’s kinda like the media reporting it to stir emotions - to get people to talk - knowing nothing substantial is going to be done about it...until the next log is found to throw into the fire....
Be willing to bet 50%+ of the sheeple don’t even know who Kerry is or what the Secretary of State does.
Kerry insists he attended the talks only because he happened to be in France on his honeymoon..His 'Honeymoon'? Hogwash.
Well, he wasn’t planting bombs at the Pentagon or anything... and his wife nakes good steak sauce!
Photograph of John Kerry meeting with Comrade Do Muoi, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam, in Vietnam. Photo displayed in
“Be willing to bet 50%+ of the sheeple dont even know who Kerry is “
Well, the bleeding heart leftist know, but the vast majority
of the PTS (public teat suckers) do not know and do not care, as long as the teat keeps flowing.
This makes more sense once you accept that to the current administration views treason is a resume enhancement.
And your point is what?
The files have either been deleted or moved.
At this point, what difference does it make? /sThe poster was sarcastically quoting Hilliary Clinton when she waited long enough to "explain" Benghazi so as to try to get people to believe her statement quoted:
You are right. Most of you live in the new USSA. Love it or leave it. It appears that 50%+ of brainless morons love it.
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was asked by Senator Ron Johnson about whether the Benghazi terror attack was the result of a movie protest, as the Obama administration claimed for weeks. "What difference, at this point, does it make?" Clinton shouted, seeming to lose her cool.SOP from the Jarrett/Obama administration.
Racebannon, good thread thanks!
Not to mention a majority of the 535 in the corrupt, criminal US Congress, and the thousands of entrenched commies/leftists/anarchists etc at all levels in US Gov’t. State Dept, EPA come to mind, right away.
That infamous line needs to be trademarked.
What difference does it make?
The Fedcoats are coming for all of us.
Thanks, RaceBannon, for this post! We figured he was a traitor. (Giving aid and comfort to the enemy in time of war). That seems to be a job requirement under this administration.
Who doesn’t know this?
This will be swept under the rug along with Bengazi. These people are a disgusting lot, and when this country gets turned around, if it does, all the disgusting filth that was done will come out. The bad part is that once exposed to a young generation of patriots, they will think we were all losers. What a mess has been left because we didn’t know how to deal with it at the time it occurred, or we were to busy not paying attention.
I keep saying how the Founding Fathers were right, you get the country you deserve.
When a Senator VOTES for a traitor, or the
HOUSE does not impeach a traitor, they individually
and loudly DECLARE into Eternity, exactly
which side they are on, ... and that side is not
“Practice” in urban Miami, Houston and...
“Re-positioning” containers of ammo...
Yes, they are coming.
Well, the day isn’t over. Hell, he may appoint Hanoi Jane to a position after he gets back from Vegas.
Has he been confirmed yet?
I never had a doubt. Now if proof could be found connecting Walter Cronkite
This almost guarantees Kerry will get the position or King Hate White America will just issue a decree to make it so.
It looks like hardcore leftists are now the mainstream, normal, sane individuals among us.
Christians need not apply; only those with an atheistic
bent and a hearty support for socialist revolution in the world are welcome.
Fake Birth Certificate $25
Fake Service Medal, (how much are Cracker Jacks) .79
Criminals running our Country...Priceless
Not one of you has made mention of the fact that he has to be approved by the US Senate.
Who is supproting him?
John McCain the man who was turned in POW camp
The man who went to Viet Nam with him to find POW’s and found a business deal.
Zero cannot appoint this traitor without the consent of other Traitors.
Every person who votes to confirm this traitor is a traitor himself.
When it is over and he is appointed to be secretary of State, take a list of those who voted to support him and you will have a list of the worst pack of Benedict arnold Mother lovers this country has ever seen, and it won’t be pretty.
A sell-out list
We should make clear that *all* senators that move in any way to allow Kerry to be Sec of State will be held accountable.
We should make clear that *all* senators that move in any way to allow Kerry to be Sec of State will be held accountable.
This coup has gone off without a hitch. Brilliantly orchestrated and near strategically genius really. No bullets, no riots, a few ignored protests, and lots and lots of sheeple.
this activity just shows that Kerry “made his bones” to become a respected member of our political class. Obama is jealous.
They could care less about what we think because they know that in 2 weeks it will all be forgotten.
Unfortunately the sheeple are too busy worrying about how to get the latest iPhone, who the Kardashians are sleeping with, Honey Boo Boo, and who will win the Super Bowl to care about the destruction of our country.
“Now the Media Matters guy apparently entered WASH DC with a armed bodyguard possessing weapons (illegal-felon) to meet with Fiensteing and others...”
David Brock lives in Washington and has for years. Knowing how many people he has smeared I’m not surprised that he fears that someone might harm him.
It’s ok, he’s a Democrat! That’s a badge of honor!
Dn't need n Weatherman t see which way the wind
"Behind the Violence, Says Jane Alpert, Was Sex"
--November 09, 1981--
"The leaders of the Weather Underground, she believes, followed a similar pattern of constantly shifting sexual alliances..."
"He [Bill Ayers] also writes about the Weathermen's sexual experimentation as they tried to 'smash monogamy.' The Weathermen were 'an army of lovers,' he says, and describes having had different sexual partners, including his best male friend."
Source: New York Times, September 11, 2001: "No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives; In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen"
"...the Weathermen, when not engaged in group sex, committed such revolutionary acts as parading with a Viet Cong flag through a local park on Independence Day and spray-painting the walls of a high school with the slogans, "Off the Pigs," "Viet Cong Will Win," and "F#$k U.S. Imperialism."..."
"What happens next bears watching closely, as does the response of the president, ex-Speaker Pelosi, and others on the left. Encouraged by leftists in the Democratic Party and funded by left-leaning nonprofit organizations and celebrity contributors, Occupy Wall Street may in time morph into something resembling the radical factions of the late 1960s and 1970s."
Is there any way we can determine Kerry’s discharge status?
They have an exhibit dedicated to Kerry’s “contribution” at the Viet Cong Museum in Ho Chi Minh City(Saigon).
Welcome to Amerika, where being a traitor is a requirement for the highest offices in the land.