Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh Show,M-F,12NOONPM-3PM,EST,WABC AM,January 29,2013
The EIB Network ^ | January 29,2013 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/29/2013 5:53:04 AM PST by Biggirl

Call The Rush Limbaugh Show program line between 12 Noon and 3PM Eastern Time at: 1-800-282-2882

E-mail Rush: ElRushbo@eibnet.com

Fax Rush at: 212-445-3963

Write a letter to Rush and mail it to:

The Rush Limbaugh Show

1270 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10020

Join This Ping List Now! Click Here To Join this Ping List!

Rush Limbaugh 2 Pictures, Images and Photos

Rush Limbaugh Show
Image by Cool Text: Free Logos and Buttons - Create An Image Just Like This

Because I have to be out all the morning and early afternoon, need to set the Rush thread early so you can have this thread for early this afternoon. Thank-you and have a wonderful day. :)=^..^=


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: fl; globaltownhall; globaltownhalltweets; housemajority; rushlimbaugh; rushlive; senatemajority; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-97 next last
Have A Good And Blessed Day.
1 posted on 01/29/2013 5:53:12 AM PST by Biggirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; LibertyisSpecial; HOYA97; ICFN(ICan'tFixNothing); StoneWall Brigade; ...

Special early ping list.


2 posted on 01/29/2013 5:54:37 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded; LibertyisSpecial; HOYA97; ICFN(ICan'tFixNothing); StoneWall Brigade; ...

Special early ping list.


3 posted on 01/29/2013 5:55:14 AM PST by Biggirl ("Jesus talked to us as individuals"-Jim Vicevich/Thanks JimV!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
I have a distant relative who needs some real help.
Please read HELP NEEDED: WANTED National News Follow-Up, Good Back Surgeon, And Good Lawyer.
Thank you.
4 posted on 01/29/2013 5:58:31 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
whao!.. early.

5 posted on 01/29/2013 6:03:52 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,spend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Bozo man can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Hello! Posted the following on another thread but felt the need to post it here too:

Do they expect the US to have only one party, the Democratic Party, from then on?

I may be a complete pessimist at this point, but I don't believe that we really have had two Parties for quite a while. Perhaps here and there, the Republicans have won Majority in either the House or the Senate, and have won some Presidencies, but nothing except for Reagan really swayed the direction of Washington. And even then, he had the House but not the Senate.

IMO, Reagan was not supposed to happen. Can you imagine how the media would have acted if Obama or Clinton would have won the number of states that Reagan won twice? And even with Reagan winning twice, the media was STILL in constant attack mode.

House Party Divisions:

1901-1911 - Republicans held Majority (10 years)
1911-1917 - Democrats held Majority (6 years)
1917-1933 - Republicans held Majority (16 years)
1933-1995 - Democrats held Majority with Republicans only having Majority from 1947-1949 and 1953-1955 (62 years!!)
1995-2007 - Republicans held Majority (12 years)
2007-2011 - Democrats held Majority (4 years)
2011-2015 - Republicans held Majority (4 years and counting)

Senate Party Divisions:

1901-1913 - Republicans held Majority (12 years)
1913-1919 - Democrats held Majority (6 years)
1919-1933 - Republicans held Majority (14 years)
1933-1981 - Democrats held Majority with Republicans only having Majority from 1947-1949 and 1953-1955 (48 years!!)
1981-1987 - Republicans held Majority (6 years)
1987-1995 - Democrats held Majority (8 years)
1995-2001 - Republicans held Majority (6 years)
2001-2003 - Democrats held Majority (2 years)
2003-2007 - Republicans held Majority (4 years)
2007-2015 - Democrats held Majority (8 years and counting)

For almost 50 YEARS, the Democrats ran both Houses of Congress. That is quite a long time to install all kinds of Pro-Democrat Party institutions.

During most of the 12 recent years that Republicans held the House and held the Senate for all but 2 of those years, they cut some taxes but did NOT do effective reforms and STILL spent like crazy.

And why in the heck do these Independents ALWAYS move in the favor of the Democrats? What kind of Uber-control does the Democrat Party have?
6 posted on 01/29/2013 9:09:27 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
Some tweets from today's Town Hall with Hillary Clinton:

Tommy Joe ‏@DrollNDry #AskState If we're throwing people in jail for bad videos, when are you going to get Lucas for the Star Wars prequels?

Kristy Lonestar ‏@luchadora41 #AskState - What will you tell Egyptian citizens if Morsi starts mowing them down with the tanks you gave him? @StateDept #Egypt #Jan25

R ‏@rlwood1 #AskState Wasn't it difficult to stand beside Amb. Stephens coffin and lie to the American public?

Leo Martin ‏@leosoup People WORLDWIDE are literally BEGGING Hillary Clinton to run for president in 2016 #askstate

David Burge ‏@iowahawkblog #AskState I'd like a career in apologizing to terrorists for American blasphemers. Can you recommend a good civil service test prep?

Razor ‏@hale_razor #AskState What terrified you more: fielding questions from Steve Kroft or dodging sniper fire on the Bosnian tarmac?
7 posted on 01/29/2013 9:17:55 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Marco Rubio will be on at 1 pm. Should be interesting.

obama is announcing his own immigration plan.....lololol, he just has to be in charge of/at the center of everything like a good dictator is want to do.

No border enforcement?


8 posted on 01/29/2013 9:17:55 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Biggirl
Rush, I read a great article by Sheriff Jim R. Schwiesow, Ret. written February 4, 2011 from "NewsWithViews.com" and here's part of it.
Read Compromise Is a Dirty Word for Club for Growth.

Take a good long look at where "Establishment Republicans" ALWAYS take us.




9 posted on 01/29/2013 9:20:46 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

Obama/Democrat Immigration Plan:

“Vote for me and you’ll get in free!”


10 posted on 01/29/2013 9:20:46 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Pretty much. Rush asks whether obama really wants an immigration deal...I think he does. He thinks he can get anything he wants; so far he has.

Hopefully, obam’s idea is what kills the immigration (make illegals legal and increase the democrat base) plan.


11 posted on 01/29/2013 9:25:29 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Girlene

President will deny border enforcement - no surprise there!!

I would stand behind CLOSING THE BORDERS FIRST if we really had an Executive Branch that would enforce that part of a bill, but sadly, we would not. Many more millions would cross the border once this bill is signed. Heck, anybody watching the borders now? I bet there is a steady stream coming over. Is the MinuteMan Project dead?


12 posted on 01/29/2013 9:25:43 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty
Obama Will Not Secure The Border (sorry for big article)

Rubio blasts Obama for resistance to border security provision in immigration plan Hours before President Obama is set to deliver a major immigration speech, a key Republican senator blasted the president for reportedly opposing a requirement to shore up border security before legalizing up to 11 million illegal immigrants.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., one of four Republican senators involved in a bipartisan effort to craft immigration reform legislation, warned the president Tuesday against taking such a position. It was the first sign since the senators unveiled their guidelines a day earlier of friction between the two efforts. “I think that would be a terrible mistake,” Rubio told Fox News. “We have a bipartisan group of senators that have agreed to that. For the president to try to move the goalposts on that specific requirement, as an example, does not bode well in terms of what his role’s going to be in this or the outcome.”

Rubio, a prominent conservative who is also Hispanic, is vital to the bipartisan effort on Capitol Hill. The senator, though, insisted that illegal immigrants not be allowed to obtain green cards — let alone citizenship — “until the enforcement stuff is in place.” “If that’s not in the bill, I won’t support it,” he said. Rubio was responding to reports that Obama, who is traveling to Las Vegas Tuesday to outline his immigration reform vision, does not want to make the legalization process contingent on increased border security.

Rather, the administration is looking at a smoother process. One administration aide said illegal immigrants would be required to pay back taxes and a fine, and move to the back of the line after would-be legal immigrants, in order to apply for legal status and eventually citizenship. In Obama’s earlier proposal, which he is expected to largely follow, he also says those applying for citizenship must learn English. After eight years, individuals would be allowed to become legal permanent residents and could eventually become citizens five years later. The issue of immigration reform was put on the back burner during Obama’s first term — overtaken by debate over health care legislation and economic measures. But along with gun control, it is one of the top items on his second-term domestic agenda.

The eight U.S. senators got ahead of him Monday, unveiling a blueprint that calls for, among other things, a path to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants already in the United States. But White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said the president “welcomes” the proposal, saying it represents the “bipartisan support coalescing” behind certain principles of immigration reform. “This is an important first step. … We need to continue the movement,” Carney said. Despite the difference over the path to legal status, an Obama administration official told Fox News the senators’ plan is on a trajectory that mirrors Obama’s immigration plan in many ways, and that the White House is willing to let the group take the lead.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., one of the eight senators, called the new proposal a “major breakthrough” and said he hopes to turn it into legislation by March — with the goal of passing something out of the Senate “by late spring or summer.” Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., standing beside him, claimed 2013 is the “best chance” lawmakers will have to tackle immigration for years. Even so, the proposed pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants drew immediate criticism from others on Capitol Hill. “No one should be surprised that individuals who have supported amnesty in the past still support amnesty,” Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, said. “By granting amnesty, the Senate proposal actually compounds the problem by encouraging more illegal immigration.”

The eight senators who unveiled the new principles are Democrats Schumer, Dick Durbin of Illinois, Robert Menendez of New Jersey and Michael Bennet of Colorado; and Republicans McCain, Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, Rubio of Florida and Jeff Flake of Arizona. The Senate framework would also require those here illegally to pass background checks and pay fines and taxes in order to qualify for a “probationary legal status” that would allow them to live and work here — but not qualify for federal benefits — before being able to apply for permanent residency, a critical step toward citizenship. Once they are allowed to apply they would do so behind everyone else already waiting for a green card within the current immigration system. Senators also want to reform the legal immigration system, including awarding green cards to immigrants who obtain advanced degrees in science, math, technology or engineering from an American university.

The principles released Monday are outlined on just over four pages, leaving plenty of details to fill in. A Senate aide tells Fox News the group’s principles say important security triggers must be met before a pathway for citizenship is created for illegal immigrants. Even then, the principles explicitly state that illegal immigrants must go to the back of the line behind would-be legal immigrants, and they will not be eligible for federal benefits while in the temporary legal status. The aide told Fox News that although many of the details of the bill still need to be worked out, those involved are encouraged by their progress and the support of senior senators. Members of the group on Sunday said they are seeking to craft a one-step, all-encompassing bill based on the shared principles.

Most of the recommendations Obama will make Tuesday are not new. He outlined an immigration blueprint in May 2011 but exerted little political capital to get it passed by Congress, to the disappointment of many Hispanics. Administration officials said the president would bolster that 2011 blueprint with fresh details. His original plan centered on four key areas: a pathway to citizenship for the 11 million illegal immigrants in the U.S., improved border security, an overhaul of the legal immigration system and making it easier for businesses to verify the legal status of workers. Administration officials said they were encouraged to see the Senate backing the same broad principles. In part because of the fast action on Capitol Hill, Obama does not plan to send lawmakers formal immigration legislation.

However, officials said the White House does have legislation drafted and could fall back on it should the Senate process stall.
13 posted on 01/29/2013 9:29:07 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I’d like to remind everyone that Dear Leader has already established his Immigration policy. It was per exec order and it removed restrictions for anyone that was in the education system and was younger than 26.

All 21 of the 9/11 hijackers would qualify.

(I may have some details confused)


14 posted on 01/29/2013 9:30:00 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty

I imagine many more are coming over now in anticipation of getting amnesty.

Rush’s idea of granting citizenship if they don’t get voting priviledges for 25 years has some merit ....except....people who broke the law to get here won’t care about breaking the law to vote. Plus, the gazillions that will be spent on social programs for these new citizens will further break our bank.


15 posted on 01/29/2013 9:33:47 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty
If we ever want it to end the rats dominance in congress we need to stop falling into all their many rat-traps. Why would we ever say the first thing about immigration/amensty when the country is broke!

We should change all the memes, all the topics, all the discussion to how to stop the free fall of our money/dollar and deficit spending,govt.out of control, no budget etc. That's the smart play.

16 posted on 01/29/2013 9:33:47 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Same sex couples added into immigration bill - what is Rush talking about?


17 posted on 01/29/2013 9:36:17 AM PST by Girlene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Obama gets another benefit from amnesty. He can recruit from millions of Spanish speakers to form his domestic protection force. They will be led by other Spanish speakers, and when they are given the order to fire on American citizens, they will obey. Thank the gang of eight when you get shot folks.


18 posted on 01/29/2013 9:46:19 AM PST by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

bttt


19 posted on 01/29/2013 9:52:17 AM PST by Matchett-PI (You know how to stop abortion? Require that each one occur with a gun -Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
You can expect the regime to try and confuse/muddy the water as much as possible. This is how they get stuff done. People are so unoraganized he gets us going in 6 different directions while all the rats are on just one, get any bill passed. Once anything is passed they can do whatever, whenever, they want.

Immigration will be whatever ozero wants it to be. If he doesn't get what he wants from Congress he willjust sign it into law with yet another Executive Order.

20 posted on 01/29/2013 9:54:52 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
hold firm rush

ask why he thinks his theory will be different this time

ask why any theory is needed until the border is secure since ‘both parties agree’ that must be done first

these rinos are playing their games again trying to shove this crap down our throats - rubio has been on every showpushing this crap - they seem to think rubio gets an ethnicity pass or can intimidate or charm is plan past conservatives

call a rino a rino

21 posted on 01/29/2013 9:56:08 AM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Love this Hispanic caller from NY.


22 posted on 01/29/2013 9:56:18 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
Hey, hey, hey...
Beanie got a MacBook Pro last night.
23 posted on 01/29/2013 9:59:48 AM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Hope and Change has become Attack and Obfuscate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

Female O____ course? Multiple universities?

Uh, Rush . . .


24 posted on 01/29/2013 10:05:40 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Since 1956, there has been in economics, “the theory of second best,” which states basically that everyone/every side has a “best/optimum” solution to any decision, but if forced to “compromise,” adopting the “second best” solution, neither side is satisfied. Instead, the “second best” solution inevitably leads to future conflict, as both sides continually try to attain their “best” solution.

Bottom line: “compromise” satisfies NEITHER side, and is a temporary stopgap measure.


25 posted on 01/29/2013 10:08:38 AM PST by CDB (Time for the "New Media" to write: "All the 'Presidents' Men: the Sequel--Benghazi-Gate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
We should change all the memes, all the topics, all the discussion to how to stop the free fall of our money/dollar and deficit spending,govt.out of control, no budget etc. That's the smart play.
I think that WE try to change the topics of discussion but many in the GOP will not, especially those "senior" members. And then when some actually DO have a backbone every once in a while, the media shuns them to the point that the kool-aid drinkers start to shun them and then, instead of listening to us, their supporters, they run for cover. It is maddening!!!
26 posted on 01/29/2013 10:10:17 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CDB
COMPROMISE is the Devil's game.
It makes all involved miserable and leads to more conflict.
27 posted on 01/29/2013 10:13:13 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Marco up now hurrah!!!


28 posted on 01/29/2013 10:13:45 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

You’re absolutely right!


29 posted on 01/29/2013 10:15:26 AM PST by CDB (Time for the "New Media" to write: "All the 'Presidents' Men: the Sequel--Benghazi-Gate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

We have a loser Senator on now, who’s giving us the old trick-eroo. I don’t trust this guy, Rubio, never did. Too bad the caller wasn’t in DC instead of this RHINO.


30 posted on 01/29/2013 10:16:40 AM PST by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

I have to hand it to Senator Rubio, he was recently on the Mark Levin Show and now Rush. At least he is willing to speak directly to the Conservative base.


31 posted on 01/29/2013 10:16:55 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sloop
no we don't agree, rubio

the ‘immigration system’ is NOT broken

enforcement is

32 posted on 01/29/2013 10:18:27 AM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Eagle of Liberty

That’s the whole point!! Screw the old media!! We don’t need them! Lets set our own agenda.Let’s shape our own agenda!! We dont need these a-hollls fromthe DBM.They only exist as long as peopel pay attention to them. Why help perpetuate their reign?


33 posted on 01/29/2013 10:19:58 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: sloop

there IS NO ‘language’ in any bill that can bind all future congresses


34 posted on 01/29/2013 10:20:06 AM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Girlene
Same sex couples added into immigration bill - what is Rush talking about?

I heard that too....Obama wants this type of legislation tied to an immigration bill. One thing that I would love is for a Constitutional Amendment that makes it so that a bill is for ONE subject only. Want to pass other things? Write and pass another bill!
35 posted on 01/29/2013 10:21:39 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

GOOD POST!


36 posted on 01/29/2013 10:22:05 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: All

Poor Rubio.....thinking that Obama will ever allow any kind of border security. I feel Rubio doesn’t really care about that part.


37 posted on 01/29/2013 10:22:05 AM PST by Fawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CDB
Since Obama is trying to lead through division (weakening the opponent when the opponent is divided against itself), he's using Amnesty as just one more wedge to divide the STUPID G.O.P.
And the RINOs just can't resist the bait. The smart move would have been to tell the Democrats Communists "HELL NO" !!!
38 posted on 01/29/2013 10:24:04 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sloop
consumer confidence hit new low in january

dance, rubio, dance

dance to obama’s music as the country implodes

39 posted on 01/29/2013 10:24:29 AM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sloop
Marco--I'm not going to be part of a bidding war the president trys to start! "The president has a choice today to make, a bidding war does not bode well unless we have real enforcement triggers we won't move on

Marco is the best Rubio/Palin 2016!!!

40 posted on 01/29/2013 10:24:33 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
People are so unoraganized he gets us going in 6 different directions

WE better come up with a solution to this FAST!!!
41 posted on 01/29/2013 10:24:41 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Be the Enemy Within the Enemy Within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Marco is quickly becoming the left’s worst nightmare next to Rush.


42 posted on 01/29/2013 10:26:04 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Am I crazy? I am picking up on some frustration in his voice.


43 posted on 01/29/2013 10:26:35 AM PST by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: CDB

It’s also a distraction AWAY FROM BENGHAZI and Obama’s TREASONOUS behavior !


44 posted on 01/29/2013 10:27:27 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: All
your answer rush - is conservatives

he is trying to shut us up and shove amnesty down our throats on the theory that every latino will vote gop

45 posted on 01/29/2013 10:28:57 AM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

I have followed him pretty closely and he has always been insistent that enforcement comes first or forget it. I believe the guy especially after meeting him. I was really impressed I’m proud he is my Senator.


46 posted on 01/29/2013 10:29:01 AM PST by rodguy911 (FreeRepublic:Land of the Free because of the Brave--Sarah Palin our secret weapon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911
I disagree.
Rubio's best move would have been "NOT TO PLAY!"
47 posted on 01/29/2013 10:29:51 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Rubio wants illegals to be eligible for benefits?


48 posted on 01/29/2013 10:30:02 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (The amount of ammo you need is determined after the gunfight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
rubio can quack his rino bs all he wants

he CANNOT have language that secures the border before any amnesty

the courts WILL NOT allow ANY second class citizen that is ineligible for ‘benefits’ - and the democrapz know it

49 posted on 01/29/2013 10:32:32 AM PST by sloop (don't touch my junk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

Rush rarely does interviews, so I am intrigued to know what is behind this.

I’m sure it was Rubio who approached Rush about doing the interview, not the other way around. But why? Is the GOP desperate to sell this bill to the Conservative base?

I recall when Rush said several election cycles ago that “emissaries were sent to [his] house” to convince him that Republicans needed to embrace amnesty due to demographics. Is the same principle in play again?


50 posted on 01/29/2013 10:33:15 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Truth/Lies; Liberty/Tyranny--WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson