Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Vietnam, rage growing over loss of land rights
Associated Press ^ | Jan 31, 2013 1:26 AM EST | Chris Brummitt

Posted on 01/30/2013 11:35:44 PM PST by Olog-hai

Faced with a group of farmers refusing to give up their land for a housing project, the Communist Party officials negotiating the deal devised a solution: They went to a bank, opened accounts in the names of the holdouts and deposited what they decided was fair compensation. Then they took the land.

The farmers, angry at the sum and now forced to compete for jobs in a stuttering economy, blocked the main road connecting the capital to the north of the country for one day in December. In a macabre gesture, some clambered into coffins. Police who came to break up the demonstration were pelted with rocks. Several people were arrested. …

Forced confiscations of land like this one are a major and growing source of public anger against Vietnam’s authoritarian one-party government. They often go hand-in-hand with corruption; local Communist Party elites have a monopoly on land deals, and many are alleged to have used it to make themselves rich. …

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: communism; landrights; socialism; vietnam
Hmm. Whose face(s) should be on a “Miss Us Yet?” poster for the Vietnamese people to view . . . ?
1 posted on 01/30/2013 11:36:00 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Maybe next time you’ll actually fight for your freedom...


2 posted on 01/30/2013 11:48:34 PM PST by WKUHilltopper (And yet...we continue to tolerate this crap...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

New England fisherman, Vietnam farmer.... same difference - but at least their commies pretended to compensate them


3 posted on 01/30/2013 11:48:44 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

“Land, see snatch,”


4 posted on 01/30/2013 11:49:07 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
Maybe next time you’ll actually fight for your freedom...

Even worse is that we DID fight for THEIR freedom yet look where we're at now in this country: gun control, religious rights going out the window. They have an excuse, what's OURS?

5 posted on 01/31/2013 12:14:10 AM PST by tsowellfan (cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

WKUHilltopper: “Maybe next time you’ll actually fight for your freedom...”

That’s really pathetic. Many, many S. Vietnamese died trying to save their country. They weren’t just fighting the N. Vietnamese. They were fighting the USSR in a proxy war for the US.


6 posted on 01/31/2013 12:14:24 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
Many, many S. Vietnamese died trying to save their country. They weren’t just fighting the N. Vietnamese. They were fighting the USSR in a proxy war for the US.

Exactly! And you might add that we were also fighting the John Kerrys and Jane Fondas in this country. Now one of them is Sec. of State.

We know why Vietnam is what it is, question is what's our excuse?

7 posted on 01/31/2013 12:17:15 AM PST by tsowellfan (cafenetamerica.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

The Msm will tell you everyone is equal in communism....

The dog returns to it’s vomitk the sow to her mire....

Fool keeps going back for more fire....

All communism does is consolidate more power away from the people and towards the ruling class...


8 posted on 01/31/2013 12:19:14 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Faced with a group of farmers refusing to give up their land for a housing project, the Communist Party officials negotiating the deal devised a solution: They went to a bank, opened accounts in the names of the holdouts and deposited what they decided was fair compensation. Then they took the land.

With the not inconsiderable additional step of a judicial hearing, that is exactly what happens here when a government wants private property for another purpose.

9 posted on 01/31/2013 12:30:50 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
Maybe next time you’ll actually fight for your freedom...

The Soviets lent the North Vietnamese billions* to buy the tanks, artillery and MiG's with which they overran South Vietnam in 1975. We cut the South Vietnamese off to ensure the North's victory. We wouldn't even lend them money. It was a small-scale repeat of Truman's decision to end aid to China's Nationalists, thereby handing the country over China's Communists, who were being lavishly funded and equipped by the Soviets with captured Japanese weaponry and Lend Lease American equipment from WWII. Soviet archives indicate that the Soviets provided logistical support for Chinese communist forces during the Chinese Civil War, which was how the Chinese Communists were able to execute extremely difficult maneuvers nobody thought them capable of with just human porters.

* Those billions were written off in the 90's against late Soviet payments on the Cam Ranh Bay base that was abandoned after the Cold War ended.

10 posted on 01/31/2013 12:31:46 AM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei
It was a small-scale repeat of Truman's decision to end aid to China's Nationalists, thereby handing the country over China's Communists

The problem with this theory is that the KMT had demonstrated no ability whatsoever to fight the commies (or anybody else) effectively. (See the comments of our officers during the war who had to deal with them.)

The USA provided a great deal of support for some time after WWII ended, including moving huge numbers of troops and even providing troops ourselves. And the KMT kept losing anyway.

The US suspension of aid was thus arguably a belated recognition of reality. In any case I have never seen any evidence that continued US aid would have turned the war around.

This is a quite different deal than the US abandonment of S. Vietnamese allies who were successfully repelling N. Viet attacks up till we stabbed them in the back.

Because the commies were evil does not mean that everyone who opposed them was on the side of the angels, much less competent.

11 posted on 01/31/2013 1:05:02 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Sherman, you are peddling the COMMIE story ~ don't forget the Japanese Army had earlier provided most of the wartime experience in Big China ~ and the KMT got smacked around mightily. The Commies fled to Yunan to sit out those events.

It is necessary to look at everything that was happening, including the American relocation of 20 to 24 million Japanese civilians from Manchuko and elsewhere.

12 posted on 01/31/2013 1:44:55 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
With the not inconsiderable additional step of a judicial hearing, that is exactly what happens here when a government wants private property for another purpose.

True, but how often is that land used to enrich political cronies or taken to punish political enemies?

13 posted on 01/31/2013 2:06:31 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Sorry, dude, I stand by what I wrote.

The Nazis fought the commies, too. That didn’t make them good guys.

The KMT was essentially a bottomless pit of corruption. It didn’t matter how much money or weapons the USA threw down that pit, the KMT was not going to be able to defend itself.

Now, in theory the US could have jumped into the war with both feet, as it later did in Vietnam. But I think any reasonable person will agree that would have been an even worse idea.


14 posted on 01/31/2013 2:14:44 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
True, but how often is that land used to enrich political cronies

All the time.

or taken to punish political enemies?

Not often that I am aware of.

15 posted on 01/31/2013 2:16:13 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Keep an eye on your zoning board. Sometimes the changes can be very interesting when you know the people involved.


16 posted on 01/31/2013 2:21:37 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Hmm. Whose face(s) should be on a “Miss Us Yet?” poster for the Vietnamese people to view . . . ?

Our New Secretary of State, John Effin Kerry?
17 posted on 01/31/2013 2:48:05 AM PST by silverleaf (Age Takes a Toll: Please Have Exact Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai; All

Wonder if we will get the usual Free Trader Communist Globalist spin that “(insert Communist Country here) is more business friendly than the US”

Last time I checked...the Communist North ended up winning in Vietnam


18 posted on 01/31/2013 3:36:04 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
Of course, don't forget the three communist agents (two of them working for the Treasury) who all lived in the same house in China: John Stewart Service (State), Solomon Adler (Treasury) and Chi Chou-ting (woking for the KMT as an economist, but was a Soviet spy) who were responsible for providing the information to the government that was used as a source of truth for the decision makers in Washington.

You do know that these three people, all confirmed Soviet agents, were collaborating on interlocking reports that were sent to the respective departments (in the case of Adler and Service) and were used to bolster the validity of each of the other's reports by the State and Treasury departments, who then advised the White House on policy?

Basically, what we did to Chiang and the KMT was exactly the same thing we did to Mihailovich in Yugoslavia when we took the word of collaborating Soviet spies, one American, one British, who sent the same interlocking bolstering reports to their governments who compared them to each other to make sure they had the "truth".

We should hang our collective heads in shame at what we did to Mihailovich who was hunted down and murdered by Tito after we threw all our support behind him, and just because Chiang got out of Communist China with his life doesn't make his betrayal any less shameful. The millions of Chinese who died under that bloodthirsty regime attest to that.

I certainly don't mean this as a personal criticism of you, because I agree with you on some points (particularly about stabbing the South Vietnamese in the back) but there ARE similarities to what we did to the KMT, and the Serbian Chetniks.

19 posted on 01/31/2013 3:57:02 AM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

The irony is staggering, isn’t it?

John Kerry, Secretary of State. Wow. A treasonous SOB, who actually engaged in real treason, as Secretary of State. I am at a loss for words.


20 posted on 01/31/2013 4:02:22 AM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

The sad thing for me is, I can’t just automatically agree with you now, I actually have to stop and consider what you just said.

THAT is a sad state of affairs. There was a time when you could reliably be branded as a lunatic and idiot for even comparing Chinese and American business environments, and rightfully so.

With the way business is treated in this country right now...one has to consider the comparisons.


21 posted on 01/31/2013 4:06:21 AM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Olog-hai.
Faced with a group of farmers refusing to give up their land for a housing project, the Communist Party officials negotiating the deal devised a solution: They went to a bank, opened accounts in the names of the holdouts and deposited what they decided was fair compensation. Then they took the land.
Trying to bomb them back into the stone age was like carrying coals to Newcastle.


22 posted on 01/31/2013 4:12:32 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

Ever heard of Eminent Domain, here in the USA? Same communism.


23 posted on 01/31/2013 4:34:06 AM PST by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan
The KMT was actually the Russian sponsored Communist party operation. The Chicoms were more domestic.

You have to remember ALL the Chinese politicians came from an authoritarian background back then ~ they had no idea you could govern a country with something other than brutality and terror.

Today even their worst thugs are still better than the nicest democracy advocates back then.

24 posted on 01/31/2013 4:42:18 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

Yes, many S. Vietnamese fought valiantly for their freedom, while Nancy Pelosi’s ilk fought with the communists.


25 posted on 01/31/2013 5:16:12 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Another example of why the right to private property is a corner stone of Freedom and Liberty, without it you are no more than a serf. Thank you, U.S. Supreme Court on the Kelo decision!
26 posted on 01/31/2013 5:17:17 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper

Jon f’n Cary said nothing bad happened in VN after we left.


27 posted on 01/31/2013 5:58:50 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

My dad flew the Hump in the CBI and had plenty of KMT corruption stories.


28 posted on 01/31/2013 6:02:35 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (In the game of life, there are no betting limits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai
Don't you just love it when communists, progressives, and leftists run headlong into the very real human problems created solely by their moronic political ideology?
29 posted on 01/31/2013 6:04:25 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost (Spirit of '75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
The KMT was actually the Russian sponsored Communist party operation.

The KMT was allied with the Bolshies up to 1927, when Chiang turned on them. The KMT was obviously and logically heavily influenced by the fascist movements that were in the air throughout the world at the time.

Otherwise, I pretty much agree with you.

If you read much Chinese history, one of the things that jump out at you is that the decline and fall of the Qing and their eventual replacement first by the KMT and then by the commies was actually a relatively mild "change of dynasty" by Chinese standards.

Probably cost the lives of at least 100M Chinese all told, but that was a slight death toll by historical standards. Most Changes of the Mandate resulted in 1/3 to 2/3 of the Chinese population dying.

The 20th century death toll didn't come close to that.

30 posted on 01/31/2013 7:11:19 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I am aware that some of those reporting to American agencies were knowing or unknowing accessories of the commies.

Others were not.

The problem here is that when the commie agents said the KMT just was incapable of winning, they were serving their masters. That does not mean what they said may not also have been objectively true.

I agree that the Chetniks were treated shamefully. But the problem is that bad things happen in war. The Allies were understandably focused on the defeat of the country they were actually at war with, not on heading off expansion of power by a present ally.

Given the reality of the forces involved (the Red Army killed 90% of the German soldiers who died in the war) American and British diplomatic agreements with the Reds were more or less irrelevant. Facts on the ground meant that the Red Army would take over most or all of Eastern Europe no matter what America did. Unless we were willing to march across Germany and go straight into battle against the Soviets. This might have been wise from a long-term political POV, but neither the American nor British people would have agreed to it.

The Germans had also just had a detailed demonstration of how difficult it was to conquer Russia. There is no guarantee we would have done any better.


31 posted on 01/31/2013 7:19:31 AM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

http://www.penang-traveltips.com/pics/sun-yat-sen-memorial-centre-1.jpg Trivia picture. Most folks don’t know this place exists.


32 posted on 01/31/2013 9:05:54 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

The point I was making isn’t really about the Soviet Union or the territories they conquered, it was about the fact that many people today still see history a certain way, because that is the way that liberals wanted it to be seen and they controlled (and still control) the language and the history books.

That was the point the other poster was addressing.

As for the Chinese Communists, there are many reliable accounts that they were simply collaborating with the Japanese because they were only interested in occupying the areas vacated by the KMT.


33 posted on 01/31/2013 7:50:56 PM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel
As for the Chinese Communists, there are many reliable accounts that they were simply collaborating with the Japanese because they were only interested in occupying the areas vacated by the KMT.

As there are many reliable accounts of the KMT, or factions within it, doing the same.

By our standards there weren't really any good guys running around East Asia at the time, just bad guys and worse guys.

I read somewhere that between 20% and 40% of Chinese draftees under the KMT died of starvation in boot camp.

Their officers embezzled the funds allocated to feed them. That is one of the unfortunate side effects of the Confucian "family first" ideology. If you ain't family, your life is worth nothing.

34 posted on 02/01/2013 12:01:30 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sherman Logan

Well, that any member of the KMT or any other person with any stature living in China since 1930 is corrupt or capable of great corruption isn’t in question...we can agree on that pretty readily.

20 or 30 million people dying of either starvation, being worked to death or simply executed outright by the Great Leap Forward Communists makes the KMT look like pikers.

I gather you feel that the Communists are either probably the lesser of two evils or that neither side was worth choosing. I wasn’t there, so...I can’t argue with you on that.

I will say that if I had to make a choice of making a go of it by backing the nationalists and taking a chance they could defeat the communists with minimal direct involvement and lots of material involvement, as General Wedermeyer had proposed, I would have gone that way.

It was the end of WWII, and we were dumping fighter aircraft in the ocean, flying planes back to the states to be cut up, munitions, supplies and so on were simply being left to rot. We could have just GIVEN that material to the nationalists instead of wasting it in massive amounts as we did.

But instead of doing that and at least trying, on the advice of people like John Stuart Service and Solomon Adler, people who said we should just cut off the nationalists at the legs, giving them absolutely NOTHING, not even aid, including the supposedly staunchly anti-communist Truman and Marshall (whose actions remain baffling to me in that time frame) just gave the country to the Red Chinese. Gave it to them, and stabbed an ostensible ally in the back. Chaing Kai-Shek wasn’t a jewel, and perhaps he would have coldly done away with 30 million of his own people as well, but I would have rather had that.

I will just have to agree to disagree with you.


35 posted on 02/01/2013 2:39:58 PM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson