Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman speculates Cuba may be behind Menendez scandal
Newark Star-Ledger ^ | 2/1/13 | Matt Friedman

Posted on 02/02/2013 9:19:24 AM PST by randita

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Defiant

It’s like a scene from an MST-3000 movie.


21 posted on 02/02/2013 4:30:08 PM PST by Delta Dawn (at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Menendezs’ political persuasion is meaningless to the Cubans. The fact Menendez is a success in the USA makes him their enemy.


22 posted on 02/02/2013 4:38:27 PM PST by Tea Party Terrorist (Those who work for a living are now outnumbered by those who vote for a living.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill
>> “...when Menendez was elevated to the Senate.” That speaks volumes. <<

Not to worry, a bunch of freepers tell me things would be sooooo much better if we abolished elections and all states could appoint "statesmen" to serve in the Senate like NJ did with Menendez.

23 posted on 02/02/2013 8:02:16 PM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk
>> BTW, FL Cubans are Republicans <<

Really? In the last election, a large majority of them (60%) voted for Obama. If that's "Republican", I'd hate to see their idea of Democrat.

24 posted on 02/02/2013 8:04:53 PM PST by BillyBoy ( Impeach Obama? Yes We Can!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
Thanks for the update on the ingrate FL Cubans, BB. Not only do I stand humbly corrected, but I will go forth and beat the living arroz con pollo out of 60% of the Cubans I run into.

Now about this all states could appoint "statesmen" to serve in the Senate like NJ did with Menendez.

The way the COTUS was originally written, Senators were not "appointed." They were to be elected by the various state legislatures. It is my belief that the amendment allowing popular election of Senators is written in such a manner that it actually gives the individual states the option of popular election, or election by the state legislature. Strong constitutionalist governors and state legislatures might do very well to re-assert their rights.

I think this important because it stripped a key power from the sovereign states; a power that they need to combat rampant federalism. It would also lessen out-of-state influence in the form of PAC contributions used to harm Senate candidates.

As you schooled me in the perfidy of the Cubans, I might add that the demographics are not working out for Federal elections winnable by those who tend to honor the Constitution. So, state sovereignty becomes ever more important for the cause.

OTOH, when an already sitting Senator needs to be replaced, and a RAT holds down the Governorship of a state, most states allow the direct replacement with the Senator of the RAT Governor's choice. We're screwed. Sorry.

25 posted on 02/02/2013 8:53:55 PM PST by Kenny Bunk (The Obama Absolution Molecule: Teflon binds with Melanin = No-Fault Marxism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson