Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court to Review Case on Obama’s Forged Documents
Liberty Beacon ^ | 30JAN13 | Liberty Beacon Staff

Posted on 02/02/2013 1:58:04 PM PST by OzarkSailor

As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court’s decision to review Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories. The case is identified as Edward Noonan, et al., v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State.

On Feb. 15, all nine justices will gather in conference to review whether Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief. Edward Noonan, et al., contend that if Obama had been ineligible to run in 2008, other Democratic candidates should have replaced him on the presidential ballot. Additionally, electoral votes from states such as California that went towards Obama should have been deemed null and void.

The Supreme Court‘s website shows that docket file no. 12A606 was originally denied by Justice Anthony Kennedy, a Reagan appointee, on Dec. 13. On Jan. 9, Chief Justice Roberts sent Dr. Taitz’s application to the full court for a review scheduled for Feb. 15.

Despite the lack of exposure from the mainstream media, the issue appears to have gained some steam among conservative bloggers. On Jan. 9, New York Times best-selling author Jerome Corsi suggested that the president’s nominee to head the Central Intelligence Agency, John Brennan, may have played a role in removing birther evidence from Barack Obama‘s passport records.

It appears that in 2008, a State Department insider was simultaneously employed by Analysis Corporation of McLean, Va. (then headed by Mr. Brennan) and was reprimanded for accessing (and possibly altering) Obama’s passport records.

(Excerpt) Read more at thelibertybeacon.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: awjeez; awjeeznotthisagain; bestlawyerintheworld; birther; birthers; conspiracy; denied; naturalborncitizen; obama; orly; orlytaitz; supreme
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
Can you imagine Biden being the President, and if Im not mistaken that would mean the Speaker of the House, Mr. Boehner would be VP. What about all the "Executive Orders" and bills Obama signed in to law. What would happen to them? Wouldn't Biden just resign the same bills, and issue the same Executive Orders"? Oh, what a tangled web we weave.
1 posted on 02/02/2013 1:58:11 PM PST by OzarkSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor
"Forged documents. Fake social security numbers.
Faked citizenship. Phoney college records. Treason.
Lies, lies, fraud, and absolutely NO accountability.
What difference does it make?"


2 posted on 02/02/2013 2:00:37 PM PST by Diogenesis (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

The Supreme Court? Oh, please. Roberts will try to have him crowned king of the world.


3 posted on 02/02/2013 2:01:19 PM PST by goldi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

What is going to happen is that the justices will read some one page memo about the case written by one of the justices’ clerks, who is likely the only person to read the briefs. That clerk will recommend that the court deny cert, and the will move onto the next case.

For the most part, that is the reality at the SCOTUS.


4 posted on 02/02/2013 2:06:49 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor
At this point, the Supreme Circus and the Injustice Department are just the window dressing on this Banana Republic and it's Homosexual Leader.

My Beber would be Stuned if anything but a travesty results.

5 posted on 02/02/2013 2:12:16 PM PST by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

John Commiechildren Roberts???

A wiseee Lateeeena???????

‘’Ya gotta be kidding me!!

Can you spell IT’LL NEVER HAPPEN IN A MILLION YEARS????


6 posted on 02/02/2013 2:13:26 PM PST by Flintlock (TRUTH--It's the new hate speach.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor
"Im not mistaken that would mean the Speaker of the House, Mr. Boehner would be VP."

If Hussein was removed as POTUS, Biden would be President, if he wanted the job. He would then choose someone as VP who would have to be approved by the Senate. This has happened before when Nixon resigned and Ford became President. Ford appointed Nelson Rockefeller who then had to be approved by a vote of the Senate.

7 posted on 02/02/2013 2:19:27 PM PST by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

I have the date marked on my calendar. Sadly, as I have said many times before on the FR site, unless or until the lame stream media gives the story legs, it will go nowhere. We certainly do not have any U.S. Congressmen with the balls to do anything about the situation. We are not going to get his bigoted A.G. to do anything about it either. Should the court find any discrepancies, I am sure the will brush the whole issued under the table. Remember, this not NIXON, this is not the Republicans, this is a ULTRA - LIBERAL, DEMOCRAT, MULATTO guy of which we are speaking. He is untouchable. You heard it hear!!


8 posted on 02/02/2013 2:21:41 PM PST by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

I’m glad we’ve got John Roberts serving the best interests of the country and the USC.


9 posted on 02/02/2013 2:27:34 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor
As of this writing, major news networks such as ABC, Fox News, CBS, and NBC have yet to report on the high court’s decision to review Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to hold political office in the United States or any of its territories.

That's because there's nothing to report. The Supreme Court "reviews" some 10,000 cases a year before deciding to hear less than 1% of them. This case will be "denied without comment" as have all the other birther cases that have found their way to SCOTUS.

In the million to one chance that the USSC decides to hear arguments on this case, you can bet the media will take notice.

10 posted on 02/02/2013 2:27:56 PM PST by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Freepers, your Contributions make every difference!
Please keep ‘em coming! Thank you all very much!

11 posted on 02/02/2013 2:31:19 PM PST by RedMDer (HEY LIBS! GUN FREE ZONE T-SHIRTS AVAILABLE NOW. I DARE YA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Drew68
Puhleze.

SCOTUS hates America and the US Constitution.

SCOTUS hates actual Law and ignores their own alleged Code of Ethics.

Behold them meet ex parte with a Defendant in a case before them
before they threw it out last time:


12 posted on 02/02/2013 2:33:34 PM PST by Diogenesis (De Oppresso Liber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

Sooner or later the truth about Obama will be known. Sadly that will likely be after he has left office and after the statute of limitations has run out. The man is a total fraud.


13 posted on 02/02/2013 2:34:12 PM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Good one...... :)


14 posted on 02/02/2013 2:37:05 PM PST by averagemo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

Unfortunately if BHO is found ineligible by the Supreme Court he could not me removed from office by the SCOTUS, he would need to be impeached by the house and remove by the senate. This won’t happen and even if it does, any laws he signed would or executive orders would remain in place.


15 posted on 02/02/2013 2:40:36 PM PST by Private_Sector_Does_It_Better (I AM ANDREW BREITBART)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Private_Sector_Does_It_Better

That does not make sense to me. If he is ineligible, wouldn’t that mean he was not eligible, therefore, impeachment would not be in the cards. It seems to me that a Federal Marshall would come and drag his smarmy ass out of the White House?


16 posted on 02/02/2013 2:49:14 PM PST by battletank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor; Jim Robinson

Wow. You and your fellow travellers sound really worried on this thread.

Just think how no different at all things would be if the SC exposes Obama and his commie nutcases as a bunch of frauds. Yeah the world would be stuck with Biden and that’s even worse! Obama is bad but not that bad...

If you’re not getting paid for your pro-Soetero contraceptive spin, you should be.

Just Wow.


17 posted on 02/02/2013 2:52:59 PM PST by Melinator (my 2 cents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

There have been half a dozen cases related to Obama’s eligibility brought to the Supreme Court. Every one of them was brought before the justices for review. Every one was denied. Odds are this case will suffer the same fate.


18 posted on 02/02/2013 2:55:53 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor
and if Im not mistaken that would mean the Speaker of the House, Mr. Boehner would be VP.

You are mistaken. Biden would become President, but then he would have to nominate a VP. This person would have to be confirmed by the Senate.

Think back to Watergate. Agnew resigned, Nixon brought in Ford. Nixon resigned ad Ford brought in Rockefeller.

19 posted on 02/02/2013 3:04:46 PM PST by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor
Let's see if we can accuritize the following: "On Feb. 15, all nine justices will gather in conference to review whetherdecide how to ignore that Obama used forged government documents and fake identification in order to get elected as commander-in-chief." The pirate Roberts was placed where he is for very specific reasons ...
20 posted on 02/02/2013 3:05:36 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

“at this late date”


21 posted on 02/02/2013 3:06:18 PM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"at this late date"

I want people to see this quote EVERY TIME they see hes on TV.

22 posted on 02/02/2013 3:07:47 PM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
"at this late date"

I want people to see this quote EVERY TIME they see her on TV.

23 posted on 02/02/2013 3:08:10 PM PST by justrepublican (Screaming like a "Vexatious requester" at a Wellstone memorial...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

Biden would pick the VP...it does not automatically go to Boehner. Succession law only applies to President

Gerald Ford selected Nelson Rockefeller as VP after Nixon resigned...the House Speaker did not become VP


24 posted on 02/02/2013 3:23:10 PM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

That has nothing to do with it. Either we are a nation of laws with no one above the law or not.


25 posted on 02/02/2013 3:38:27 PM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

or they will determine that voters have a right to choose what they want to do with their votes and forgery is moot


26 posted on 02/02/2013 3:38:27 PM PST by KTM rider ( American at heart..... Rebel by force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

Well then lawful elections are moot and brute force is the determinant.


27 posted on 02/02/2013 3:41:06 PM PST by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

After the Supreme court blows this off as nothing then it will send a message to others that no case against Obama will ever get anywhere in the long run. No doubt that this is what this is all about. Roberts is working to protect Obama as always.


28 posted on 02/02/2013 3:49:58 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verga

If BO is gone, I don’t think Biden would be VP. His appointment was done by BO, which was an illegal act.


29 posted on 02/02/2013 3:50:58 PM PST by native texan (I love Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

seems odd to me that Roberts would select it for review. could it be that he wants to right his wrong? years ago....woooweeee, when his ineligibility was being discussed, it was suggested that a new election would be called after a couple or 3 months to organize.


30 posted on 02/02/2013 3:58:42 PM PST by stickywillie (was that a glimmer of hope, or is it just that Dale Carnegie Course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

if roberts is trying to protect bathhouse barry, why did he select his file for review?


31 posted on 02/02/2013 4:02:32 PM PST by stickywillie (was that a glimmer of hope, or is it just that Dale Carnegie Course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

If a Militia of more than 10,000 members wants to go after DC with a plan to cleanse the enemy within , I am all in . I would rather die free than live as a slave to this evil government.


32 posted on 02/02/2013 4:04:27 PM PST by KTM rider ( American at heart..... Rebel by force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: stickywillie
because they can set a precedent that essentially superceeds the requirement to be a Natural Born citizen

similar to abortion, they superceeded the unborn humans right to life by making the point a womans right to choose state sanctioned homicide

33 posted on 02/02/2013 4:11:26 PM PST by KTM rider ( American at heart..... Rebel by force)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Great ! Obama gets sh#t-canned, Biden becomes POTUS, and he puts Reid in as VP. Chuckie Shumer or Turban Durbin becomes new Senate Majority Leader.....NEXT!


34 posted on 02/02/2013 4:29:54 PM PST by traditional1 (Amerika.....Providing public housing for the Mulatto Messiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor
8-)

35 posted on 02/02/2013 4:30:46 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,spend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Bozo man can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

“because they can set a precedent that essentially superceeds the requirement to be a Natural Born citizen similar to abortion, they superceeded the unborn humans right to life by making the point a womans right to choose state sanctioned homicide”.....because they have denied it so many times before, hasn’t that already been done? over & over & over is a more powerful precedent?


36 posted on 02/02/2013 4:37:24 PM PST by stickywillie (was that a glimmer of hope, or is it just that Dale Carnegie Course?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

How utterly servile of you! I suppose you don’t break the law if you don’t get caught is your personal motto, eh? You are the sheeple ... power to the sheep!


37 posted on 02/02/2013 4:38:07 PM PST by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: American in Israel
"At this point, the Supreme Circus and the Injustice Department are just the window dressing on this Banana Republic and it's Homosexual Leader."
@ this point, true, who ever would have thought John Robert, would be this
decades' souter?...an glory-seeking anti-constitutionalist establishment geek.

38 posted on 02/02/2013 4:41:34 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (who'll take tomorrow,spend it all today;who can take your income,tax it all away..0'Bozo man can :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: native texan
If BO is gone, I don’t think Biden would be VP. His appointment was done by BO, which was an illegal act.

Biden was nominated by Obozo, but legally elected, twice.

39 posted on 02/02/2013 4:48:54 PM PST by verga (A nation divided by Zero!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: stickywillie

Maybe he is tired of being blackmailed.


40 posted on 02/02/2013 4:59:02 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: battletank

“That does not make sense to me. If he is ineligible, wouldn’t that mean he was not eligible, therefore, impeachment would not be in the cards. It seems to me that a Federal Marshall would come and drag his smarmy ass out of the White House?”

Constitutionally the only way a president can be removed from office is impeachment. The house might impeach him (but I doubt if the wimpy repubs there would have the guts to do it). Even if they did impeach, the senate would then need to convict with a two thirds majority. NO WAY are there enough dems in the senate with integrity for that to happen.

And all of the above is predicated on the SCOTUS declaring him ineligible and there isn’t a snowballs chance in hell that is going to happen. This entire thing is a pipe-dream. But after the election all I have left is dreams and the memories of the greatest nation in the history of civilization.


41 posted on 02/02/2013 5:02:04 PM PST by Private_Sector_Does_It_Better (I AM ANDREW BREITBART)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: StormEye

Not so sure that is how it would go. Obama was elected President. If his election was void, the eligible person who had the most votes in every state was Romney. No one voted for Biden for President. If Obama’s election is void, Biden was never VP.


42 posted on 02/02/2013 5:09:39 PM PST by Defiant (If there are infinite parallel universes, why Lord, am I living in the one with Obama as President?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeaHawkFan

“What is going to happen is that the justices will read some one page memo about the case written by one of the justices’ clerks, who is likely the only person to read the briefs. That clerk will recommend that the court deny cert, and the will move onto the next case.”

Bingo. Countless other cases like this one have made it to conference. It takes 4 justices to vote to take up a case and so far no dice. I see this one getting kicked to the curb just like the others.


43 posted on 02/02/2013 5:23:04 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: scotus

The President of the United States and Commander in Chief, AKA: Barack Hussein Obama, may be ineligible to hold office. There exists a well documented and tenable charge of fraud. To date; there is compelling and reasonable doubt regarding the legal and constitutional authority of this person. This matter deserves the solemn attention by those Justices, who should act, if only for the self-preservation of their appointed positions.


44 posted on 02/02/2013 5:24:49 PM PST by notted
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OzarkSailor

You are mistaken. Boehner is third in line for the presidency but he doesn’t become vice president if Obama has to resign. Biden would choose who he wants as vice president.


45 posted on 02/02/2013 6:46:57 PM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traditional1

I agree, but.. We need to send a message that non-Americans will NEVER AGAIN be allowed to have their finger on the trigger of a Trident submarine without at least a CURSORY background check.


46 posted on 02/02/2013 9:02:16 PM PST by HMS Surprise (Chris Christie can STILL go straight to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Private_Sector_Does_It_Better

If he is ineligible now then he was when he ran for office.

If he is ineligible then he cannot be president and therefore is subject to arrest for fraud and another crimes by any county Sheriff or possibly the capitol hill police.

I think it is the 20th and the 25th amendments that govern the succession and requirements for president. It is pretty clear and scary (the succession list) because we may have to go back to 2008 to determine who ‘should’ be in, in that case. I am just guessing here.

If he is ineligible it seems right to me all laws signed by him, all exec orders, all treaties agreed to and whatever action he has taken or authorized would be null and void.

There would be turmoil ... no doubt the reason Biden is more prominent right now than before and DHS is loading up on ammo and ‘PDW’ not to mention the steps to disarm the populace.

Interesting times.


47 posted on 02/03/2013 11:07:08 AM PST by GOPBiker (Thank a veteran, with a smile, every chance you get. You do more good than you can know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GOPBiker

Not true, case law is well established in this area. All laws signed would unfortunately still be intact. Also, he could not be arrested or peosecuted except by the house and senate, the constitution is very clear in this area.


48 posted on 02/03/2013 12:44:44 PM PST by Private_Sector_Does_It_Better (I AM ANDREW BREITBART)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GOPBiker

Interesting times indeed.


49 posted on 02/03/2013 1:10:53 PM PST by OzarkSailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: stickywillie

I already explained it. Except the part where many people will ask the question that you are asking. And that is exactly what they want you to think. We are talking about master manipulators here. Just ignoring it causes more doubt. But a finding of “nothing here” serves to pacify those who can’t see beyond the ruse.


50 posted on 02/03/2013 2:56:14 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson