[Pollster1]

That's a lot of guns, enough that I might consider him quirky (or maybe not). Still, it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . ." to take his property if there is insufficient justification for criminal charges. [Courts may disagree with me, but if so, they are wrong.] I'd rather have armed American citizens defending themselves on their own than a Department of Homeland Security that ignores the Bill of Rights.

[GraceG]

That’s a lot of guns, enough that I might consider him quirky (or maybe not). Still, it is a violation of the Fourth Amendment “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated . . .” to take his property if there is insufficient justification for criminal charges. [Courts may disagree with me, but if so, they are wrong.] I’d rather have armed American citizens defending themselves on their own than a Department of Homeland Security that ignores the Bill of Rights.

I collect LEGO, does that make me a criminal?

FDR made gold coin collectors criminals in the 1930’s Obama will do the same with Guns...