Skip to comments.Sunday Morning Talk Show Thread...(sort of)
Posted on 02/03/2013 8:13:28 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER
OK, somebody has to do it. Where else will we turn?
Not the same...but here’s a blank canvas.
My Sunday Morning News shows are over now. I’ll try to post some stuff from memory. Martin Dempsey (Chairman Joint Chiefs) was on with Panetta on NBC. F Chuck Todd was sitting in doing the hosting. Regarding the Hagel mess this week, it seems Dempsey was one of the people helping him prepare for the hearing.
LOL, why does that not surprise me?
Be careful, however, that the exercise of your Freedom does not become a stumbling block to the weak. 1 Cor 8:9
What if everything about evolution is a lie? This would mean everything built on the theory of evolution is a fraud too. One of the primary gaps evolutionists never want to discuss is where life began? They have two primary theories, it either randomly developed from the primordial soup of came from another universe on an asteroid. Neither of these theories is believable yet the entire theory of evolution is built on them even though the odds are around one in infinity.
There is a huge void in scientific explanation how life and evolution started so most scientists dismiss it as not important or in any need of explanation or proof. They say there was a Big Bang when nothing became something and then exploded into an explosion creating the universe according to all of their infallible models. After billions and billions of years, life magically, oops, scientifically appeared to begin the evolutionary chain. The only explanation the Darwinists have for life beginning is time rather than God. For evolutionists God is to be mocked while billions and billions of years is a serious explanation.
If you ask an evolutionist how life began they will immediately tell you that how life began is not a part of evolution. If you continue to ax the question they will either call you all types of names the worst of which is Christian or explain how only scientists understand how life began. It usually comes down to their ability to intimidate and bully people and even fellow scientists into backing down from the obvious black hole of lifes beginning. They will usually begin their virtual firing squad for anyone daring to question the beginning of life as subhuman and not part of academias Holy of Holies.
Their primary explanation is the primordial soup explanation. After the Big Bang and the earth formed with millions of years of volcanoes and flowing lava when the hydrogen and oxygen combined to form water and the cooling began. Randomly the earth just happened to circle the sun at exactly the right orbit and rotation to make the water the perfect temperature for life. Then a few million years ago the chemicals randomly formed amino acids turning into some type of primitive bacteria and billions of years later that bacteria is making laptops.
The problem with this theory is how complex that random event had to be. As scientists become more and more familiar with amino acids and DNA they are finding it is far more complex than they ever knew it was. The genetic codes are still ninety eight percent unexplained as they find more and more unexplainable pieces of the complexity it points less and less to a random act. They were dismissing the unexplained parts as Junk DNA pieces since they have only been able to identify less than 2% of DNA code and invented the term junk for the rest. This should be insulting to their intelligence and certainly to ours. As they get deeper and deeper into the DNA code they are finding that there is no junk in the code and more complexity making the randomness even less possible. Simply Google junk DNA and find out the lies are being exposed by those brave enough to question science. It would take trillions and trillions of years for a DNA helix to form randomly not simply billions. http://www.psrast.org/junkdna.htm
Their second explanation which is not as universally accepted but basically a fallback theory is the amino acids and life source came from space. This was developed when they realized their primordial soup explanation really didnt hold water. So they developed the asteroid explanation that a life seed came from a distant solar system billions of light years away and fell to the earth at just the right time and apparently into the ocean after it survived the billion year trip in a vacuum and thousand degree temps during entry into our atmosphere. The obvious questions are where did it come from and is the solar system it came from more or less superior than ours. It is ok to believe there are life forms on other planets but it is not ok to believe there is a God.
Simply because a scientist says over billions of years and billions of chances can make something happen does not make it so. This is only a theory but one that really does not withstand the smell test when you think about it. Fortunately for evolution, scientists generally refuse to question any of their theories and rely on consensus to verify and vilify their earth sized holes in their theories. They have had to fight for this theory so completely and ignore so many craters it has become more of a magic show than science. They use smoke and mirrors to keep people from asking the important questions or demanding an explanation of why those odds are looking more like infinity to one than the truth.
Imagine if scientists spent as much time, energy and money trying to find out if God is real than trying to disprove God. Science has become a religion based on an atheistic belief that we began as nothing and when we die we go back to nothing. It is a religion that places all of its faith in evolution with no explanation of how life arrived but when it came, random chance and mutations has got us to the point man can think, read and write. They have replaced God with billions and billions of years so time is the miracle of our creation. What is the difference between their faith in billions of years and faith in God?
Evolution became the first agenda driven junk science of the modern world. Science is basically following a 19th century idea which if they were true scientists would have been disproved millions of times over but the politics wont allow it. They need to have people turn from God to force their hope and trust in the gummit. They need the people to believe gummit is their god where all of their hope exists.
If people would put their faith and hope in God they would not need the gummit and most of its controls. If people were saved by Jesus Christ and believed he is where all hope exists there would be a heaven beyond this earth, something the Darwinists cant offer. If there is a heaven and hell and Jesus saves us sinners from that torture we deserve then we wouldnt need gummit to regulate our lives as we would simply follow the rules set in the Bible. This is the communists greatest fear that people would be free to live their lives as they wish without their absolute control.
Imagine if science were to investigate the marvel of Gods creation and how it so miraculously relates together rather than attempting to use his design as proof there is no God? Science could actually be a positive to most lives rather than its need to be god and repeatedly use its power to control our lives with all of their junk science decrees. You can see all the failures of science everywhere you look so why do we continue to believe evolution with all of its massive gaps? It is time to evolve from evolution.
Pray for Alas Babylon
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Wayne LaPierre NRA CEO and Executive VP, CAPT Mark Kelly (USN Ret) husband of former Arizona Congress Woman gabby Giffords
MEET THE PRESS (NBC):Outgoing SecDef Leon Paneetta and CJCS GEN Martin Dempsey, Bob Costas
FACE THE NATION (CBS): NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell
THIS WEEK (ABC): Senator harry Reid (D-NV)
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Outgoing SecDef Leon Paneetta and CJCS GEN Martin Dempsey
Chris Wallace had on Space Shuttle Commander Mark E. Kelly, the husband of Gabby Giffords. Talking about their proposal for gun control.
Next they had on Wayne LaPierre from the NRA...Wallace beating on him for opposing unConstitional gun control measures.
Panel talked about the painfully embarrassing Senate confirmation hearing of former NE Senator Chuck Hagel who didn’t seem to know diddly. He will be confirmed.
On Fox his morning, I noticed the sharp contrast on how Chris Wallace questioned Capt Kelly and Wayne LaPierre. He lobbed softballs to Kelly and was confrontational with LaPierre. It was a hit job.
Thanks for another brilliant post, Bray.
Certainly hope A.B. is OK.
Chris Wallace debating Wayne LaPierre, not interviewing, with a bias slant was unforgivable.
FU Chris Wallace! You lost what little credibility you had.
I’ll ping to a few more. Pinging a few of you that participated in last week’ comments.
It’s too bad Brit Hume wouldn’t come out of retirement and take Chris’s chair away from him.
Watching Wallace interview/interrogate LaPierre (NRA VP) was unbelievable. Wallace used every hyperbolic comment he could muster to dissuade LaPierre. In addition to his frequent motor-boat interruptions [”but but but”], Wallace made no attempt to be object and blatantly kept bringing up the position of the anti-gun lobby.
Chris Wallace is a disgrace. He let Kelly slide on every Libtard talking point.
If “common sense” gun control was a drinking game I’d be too wasted to watch the Super Bowl.
FOX needs to fire his ass.
“FOX needs to fire his ass.”
AMEN! And send little Shemp Smith with him.
Jackass Wallace kept cutting off LaPierre every answer he gave. What a prick!
FOX deserves a higher standard.
Thanks, ROCKLOBSTER. I watched NBC instead of catching FOX this am.
So is Mark Gifford (I don’t include Gabby, since she has a long way to go (bless her heart) before I believe a position she takes is her own) going along with Feinstein’s crazy proposals?
People who have gone through such a horrific tragedy are always put at the center of these discussions (if their views match the media’s). It is sad to see them being used.
I agree. But they are doing their damndest right now to erode their 12 year reign at the top of the cable news ratings.
Shemp Smith doing more commentary than straight (no pun intended) news reporting on Studio B...BOR having idiots like George Stephanopolis onhis show to spout the DNC talking points almost unchallenged...and hiring Dennis Kook-cinich and letting Bob Beckel and his F Bomb dropping self run wild all over the airwaves. And then there’s Skeletor showing up as a panelisst allthe time. All these loser Dems hired by Newscorp is turning the place into CNN-lite.
Thanks Tex, excellent job on the guest menu
Thanks for the pings Miss Girlene.
And Bray, great op-ed. I think you already know, I fully support extinction.
OOps, should have written Mark Kelly, not Mark Giffords.
Yes he is.
Wallace kept bringing up the need for stricter gun registration/mental health requirements.
[Like the ACLU will stand for that.]
[That would not have stopped the gunman at Newtown. Also criminals/gang members ignore the law, so they would also ignore registrations/background checks. The government can’t even secure the border, so what makes any liberal think their taking the guns will stop criminals from getting guns elsewhere?]
Well you know Wallace, or any interviewer, is going to throw softballs to Giffords/Kelly. That is a given. That is why the left wants them to be the face of gun control. This way, there is no debate between the two sides of an issue.
When I was watching NBC or ABC (not sure which one), I thought I saw a clip of LaPierre indicating his agreement that the gun show loophole SHOULD be closed. Is this an old clip, did I mishear, or ????
It is beneath contempt the way the RATs are using her, just like all the other shooting victims, to further their agenda of disarming the American public.
I wonder if some of these "gun-violence" events aren't staged or perpetrated?
The city of Chicago just had a month where more people died on their streets than died in Afghanistan.
And Chicago has some of the tightest gun laws in the nation.
I wish someone that shows up on TV that is pro 2nd Amendment would counter the gun grabbers with that factoid when they start talking about the need for tighter controls.
“It is beneath contempt the way the RATs are using her, just like all the other shooting victims, to further their agenda of disarming the American public.”
It’s par for the course for Libtards. Never let a crisis go to waste...
And as far as Giffords is concerned...IMO no one can use you unless you let them.
Former Navy SEAL Chris Kyle fatally shot at Texas shooting range
Chris Kyle, a former U.S. Navy SEAL credited with the largest number of confirmed kills, was one of two people fatally shot at a North Texas shooting range Saturday, Texas Highway Patrol confirmed to Fox News.
Erath County Sheriff Tommy Bryant told the Star-Telegramthat Kyle, 38, was shot by a suspected gunman, identified as 25-year-old Eddie Ray Routh, around 3:30 p.m.
Routh allegedly opened fire on the two men before fleeing in a pickup truck belonging to one of the victims, according to the report
No, I don’t think they were staged, but is shameful to use someone who is not speaking their own mind on an issue. Gabby has come a long way, and it is a miracle that she survived. I feel sorry for both of them, BUT, their opinion doesn’t mean squat when it comes to “shall not infringe” aspect of the 2nd Amendment.
Today Republican Strategist and Marco Rubio spokesperson Ana Navarro has stolen the show.She nailed F. Chuck pretty good when the topic of Chuck (the other schmuck) Hagel came up.
Navarro:Hagel is so lame "he has to clarify his clarification of his clarification."
Just too good.
Later on during the immigration questions Navarro told how Marco has made all the rounds almost 24/7 getting the word out about how Republicans won't be rolled and want border security before agreeing to any of the dems plans.
Marco is smart enough to spread the word both in English on all the major talk shows and in Spanish.
Praying that Alas Babylon is okay. Wow.
The Tea Party is being marginalized everywhere in the media. Guess Rove likes working with the left.
Regarding Hillary, I wouldn’t put it past her being given a heads up on what will be asked. It wouldn’t take a rocket scientist to come up with her own list without any help.
I hope someday, she (and the whole disgusting lot involved) pays for her actions concerning Benghazi. That comment, “What Difference Does It Make”, while funny in a peculiar way, is plain evil. An Ambassador was murdered, and these idiots are getting away with doing nothing but bringing shame to our reputation in the world.
Died in committee? I didn’t realize that. I must have been sleeping.
Gotta tell ya TX FNC was a hero for me this morning with the death of Chris Kyle story they kept on the air and made it “the” huge story for some time. Doubt if any of the drivebys will do as much.
Above is one of the many links here on FR re: an American Hero Chris Kyle — award winning sniper with 160 kills that saved countless lives— Chris Kyle who was assassinated by a former troubled soldier he was trying to help.Sad day for America.
Kyle story on FNC right now,again!
I don't see it as funny. At all.
In fact, that is the most uncaring, trivializing, arrogant statement made by a politician in a very long time.
Hillary out arrogants nobama.
Once again its all about the left making themselves look good and us look bad.Slick little else. They will use anyone, anywhere, any time to destroy us. That’s what it is all about.I wish we would get it.
Hero and a fellow W. Texan I might add.
R.I.P Sailor. The Navy Hymn plays for you today.
Exactly, we all grieve for Chris Kyle today, especially his friends in the Palin family.
Wallace should take some big time stuff for showing partisanship against Lapierre. That was really something to see. Wallace doesn’t do his cause any good by riling up law abiding citizens.
So, you were impressed with Ana Navarro? She’s smart, well-spoken, but I don’t agree with her on the immigration stuff. Yes, she did make fun of Hagel (YAY), but she’s going along with the senators “bipartisan” immigration reform proposal. Do any of these people really think closing the border or strengthening border enforcement is going to happen under obama? I don’t.
Here’s yet another from F.Chuck sitting in for DNC Dave today on MTP where panetta had to admit that water boarding really works!
Hey I can’t afford my dollar a day right now but I do it anyway.For me donating to FR is an investment in freedom!!
Martin Dempsey is the weasel?
Man,this using of Gabriel Giffords come on, isn’t that just a bit TOO obvious?
Youu know somebody’s getting paid, maybe the Giffords’ hubby, a promise of a financed political run to come, maybe? This way the hubby benefits from shamelessly exploiting his wife and so shall the already shameless Democrats.
That’s one of my highlights so far....watching a DVR.