Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Extreme Sentiment: Barron's Cover "Get Ready for Record Dow - We Told You So"; Top Call
Townhall.com ^ | February 13, 2013 | Mike Shedlock

Posted on 02/04/2013 7:57:39 AM PST by Kaslin

Looking for extreme sentiment?
Look no further than the cover of Barron's magazine.



The cover speaks for itself, but check out some of the commentary in New Highs in Sight

The party is far from over. The early-year rally that on Friday took the Dow Jones Industrial Average to within 1% of its record high, set in 2007, could have a lot further to run. For starters, stocks aren't expensive. The Standard & Poor's 500 index is valued at about 14 times estimated 2013 profits and the Dow fetches less than 13 times projected 2013 earnings. At the market peak in 2007, the Dow traded for 16 times forward earnings. Given ultralow interest rates, the market multiple has room to expand even if earnings growth remains modest.

There's a huge amount of money that could shift into stocks because individuals until recently have favored bonds over equities, based on mutual-fund flow data. "If there is a great rotation going on from bonds to stocks, we may be only in the top of the first inning," says Jason Trennert, chief investment strategist at Strategas Research Partners in New York. Trennert cites the TINA -- or "there is no alternative" -- factor, as yield-starved investors move into stocks.  

First Inning?

For starters, are the forward earnings estimates any better now than they were in 2007?

Second,  let me point out that money does not flow from stocks to bonds or vice versa. For every buyer of stocks there is a seller, so the statement on rotation from bonds to stocks is point blank absurd. There can be a repricing of bonds, a repricing of stocks, a repricing of both, or a repricing of neither, but there is no flow.

Third let me ask "Does it get any more extreme than someone calling this the first inning after stocks have had more than a 100% rally in a few years?

Nonetheless, sentiment alone cannot time a top. Perhaps the DOW or the S&P do make new record highs. Regardless, this Barron's cover reminds me of a post I did back in 2005.

Home $weet Home

Back on June 7th, 2005 I put in a top call with help from Time Magazine. That top call was based on this cover.



Time Magazine went gaga over real estate on the June 12th issue, right at the very peak of the bubble. Congratulations must go out to Time Magazine for that fine achievement.


On March 26, 2005, in It's a Totally New Paradigm I posted this chart



Then when the cover of Time hit, I moved the arrow to the top. Check out the comments at the time.

Ron Shuffield, president of Esslinger-Wooten-Maxwell Realtors says that "South Florida is working off of a totally new economic model than any of us have ever experienced in the past." He predicts that a limited supply of land coupled with demand from baby boomers and foreigners will prolong the boom indefinitely.

"I just don't think we have what it takes to prick the bubble," said Diane C. Swonk, chief economist at Mesirow Financial in Chicago, who was an optimist during the 90's. "I don't think prices are going to fall, and I don't think they're even going to be flat."

"I look at this as a short-term investment," said Mr. Farquharson, 36, who works for a venture capital firm, "and plan to unload it as soon as things look dangerous."


Top Call  

Supposedly we are only in "the first inning" of a rally. Hmm. Are stocks supposed to rise 900% more? This may not be "the top" but it's close enough for me. I'm calling it.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial
KEYWORDS: barrons

1 posted on 02/04/2013 7:57:41 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

No, don’t believe Barron’s. Believe the lunatic blogosphere who constantly predict doom. My average last year was +15%.

Oh, sorry. Back to our regularly schedule panic.


2 posted on 02/04/2013 8:08:33 AM PST by TheRhinelander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Maybe Barrons is right and maybe they’re wrong. Likewise, maybe the ‘blogosphere’ is right or maybe the predictions of doom are wrong.

Fact is nobody knows the future.


3 posted on 02/04/2013 8:25:36 AM PST by MichaelCorleone (A return to Jesus and prayer in the schools is the only way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander
Does this look like a blog to you, nuby?

I don't believe that a blog has a $5.00 price on it's cover

4 posted on 02/04/2013 8:32:03 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander
No, don’t believe Barron’s. Believe the lunatic blogosphere who constantly predict doom.

To be fair, many of these sites like ZeroHedge are right in pointing out how sick the economy and the markets really are. Just because they are going up and you can make some easy money, largely due to QE4ever, doesn't mean they are healthy.

But yeah, it is kind of comical. Much of the blogosphere, especially the libertarian sites, predict doom and gloom pretty much constantly. If you listened to those sites you'd have missed a massive market run up, have all your money invested in gold coins - which would be packed away in your bug out bag or buried underground at strategic locations. These sites really need to chill out, stop rooting for economic disaster (mostly because they want to be proven right), and admit they really don't know how much debt we can pile up without an implosion. We just may be able to kick the can down the road for many years to come and a lot of millionaires and billionaires will be made during that time.

5 posted on 02/04/2013 8:33:13 AM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Isn’t that the truth


6 posted on 02/04/2013 8:33:21 AM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ahhhh.....I remember my professor explaining THE RATIONAL MAN THEORY OF INVESTING. He ended the lecture by saying that that theory doesn’t explain modern investing.


7 posted on 02/04/2013 8:37:36 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
To The People On the Street, not Wall Street:

2013 begins..."the "unemployment" rate notched UP to 7.9%. Employment saw little or no change re: manufacturing, business and professional services, financial activities, government. Transportation and warehousing sector down."

Source

Seems the govt always Finds the #s to support 'like' they find ballots which determines the outcome of said[D]election in a basement or trunks of cars.

Or

Eventually Americans won't 'feel the magic' when a white dove flies out of the govt.magician's sleeve after knowing it has been completely dehydrated, kept in small space, then re-hydrated, flying back to life need be but confused.

"The U.S. economy posted a stunning drop of 0.1 percent in the fourth quarter, defying expectations for slow growth and possibly providing incentive for more Federal Reserve stimulus." [Trillion dollar deficits yr aft yr]

"The economy shrank from October through December for the first time since the recession ended, hurt by the biggest cut in defense spending in 40 years, fewer exports and sluggish growth in company stockpiles." Source

8 posted on 02/04/2013 8:41:56 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Fact is nobody knows the future.


Actually, the future is pretty clear. It’s the timing that’s the rub. Who knew, five years ago, that we would be doing the absurd things we are doing now to continue to kick the problem down the road. But the road DOES come to an end. And the fall will be biblical. It has to be. This is the whole civilized world we are talking about, not Zimbobwe.

Whatever medications are taken in the interim, the final outcome is highly predictable because it will be involuntary and the end for all fiat currencies: Runaway inflation followed by chaos. In this case, probably war more devastating than WWII. Especially for the US, who came out of that one the least impacted.


9 posted on 02/04/2013 8:44:04 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

Congratulations on your + 15 % However, when you factor in the true cost of inflation I would imagine that your returns are not quite so spectacular. IMO the new normal will be advancing stock prices that cannot keep pace with the decline in the dollar, so real returns will not be as they appear. There is no other game in town really so it may not matter much until it REALLY matters. YMMV


10 posted on 02/04/2013 8:45:04 AM PST by 1malumprohibitum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheRhinelander

No, don’t believe Barron’s. Believe the lunatic blogosphere who constantly predict doom. My average last year was +15%.


I was discussing stocks with a friend of mine in October of 1999. It was pretty cool how well he had been doing. REALLY well, actually. However, pretty much everyone in the market was.

He got trimmed back to size in 2000, and that is grossly understated. In my case I HAD to take my money out in January of 2000. Thank God. The Lord works in mysterious ways.

My point: You do well until you don’t. And if you are really good, you can make big money shorting the crazy highs. As I’m sure you know, the 1929 (and subsequent) crash made a lot of people rich.


11 posted on 02/04/2013 8:49:55 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The market is heavily subsidized, and investors might as well get in on the party while it lasts. Too bad the rest of the economy can’t be so easily manipulated.


12 posted on 02/04/2013 8:52:58 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay

I know only ONE thing regarding stocks::

IN 1997, when I left the Tandy repair job—I had some of their stock. 35 shares..Over the nexst 3 years...it split THREE times—and in late 2000..it topped 10k in value!! I thought it would ALWAYS be “great”. but, sometime near Christmas...SOMEONE who came into the repair shop I was workng at then..convinced me to “roll that stock into Oracle”. Fr SOME reason...I just accepted his word, without much questions—and did so. Not long after that...the market tumbled..That Tandy stock TANKED...and it NEVER came back. oracle DID. I got 281 shares of it from the Tandy stock—and sold 50 last year for a “need for property taxes”.

Move forward to today...I still have the 231 shares of Oracle. It is worth almost 8000. had I kept with Tandy—that 140 shares is now worth a little over 4 HUNDRED!!

I never even really knew this guys name. But...he did me a HUGE favor!!


13 posted on 02/04/2013 8:53:50 AM PST by Rca2000 ( Still too shocked to have a tagline....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Dow will go even higher as Obama continues to devalue the dollar.


14 posted on 02/04/2013 8:54:21 AM PST by Iron Munro (I Miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Freepers, your Contributions make every difference!
Please keep ‘em coming! Thank you all very much!

15 posted on 02/04/2013 9:13:03 AM PST by RedMDer (HEY LIBS! GUN FREE ZONE T-SHIRTS AVAILABLE NOW. I DARE YA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I totally agree with Barrons. The stock exchange has got a long way to go yet.

Here's a little lesson from history:


16 posted on 02/04/2013 9:18:35 AM PST by agere_contra (I once saw a movie where only the police and military had guns. It was called 'Schindler's List'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rca2000
Shows the benefit of "long term" as in any good 'weeded out' strong performing Tech investment in the 90's. Also you didnt "invest more than you could afford to lose" as the term goes.

Yes, the 90's were fun weren't they. Could buy an "unknown" Alaskan Internet stock for $2 on Friday and sell on Tues next for $22. But that was "play". Splits common. EZ as watching CNBC + their stock hypes for the day. But better to be have knowledge/or be part of a company in the tech/internet/equip maker related sector at the time. You know who was strong, who was not.

The reason for my first post was when govt, politics and/or Elections r involved-- the reckless rethoric for Votes caused serious financial consequences to all investors, the whole world as well. Again the "uninformed voter" spurs on a "good crisis" set into action by politicians.

In Washington: One can run for office with very little money to one's name and wind up with over a hundred million dollars by the time you become Sec of State [marrying up also helps ;)] Very little risk involved.

I happily still rely on the advice + "long term" services provided by my financial professionals. It's not just buying this or that co. stock anymore.

Thanks

17 posted on 02/04/2013 11:17:48 AM PST by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson