Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado: The Assault on the Second Amendment Commences in Denver
NRA-ILA ^ | February 5, 2013 | NA

Posted on 02/05/2013 3:13:57 PM PST by neverdem

Anti-gun legislators in the Colorado General Assembly have wasted no time this legislative session attempting to victimize and disarm law-abiding residents of the Centennial State. Just today, a comprehensive gun control package was unveiled that aims to strip you of your Second Amendment rights.

While official bill language has not been released, below are some of the disturbing and disenfranchising proposals announced today. The actual legislation may be introduced as early as tomorrow, so please stay tuned to www.nraila.org for updates on the evolving status of the comprehensive anti-gun package.

Under the proposed legislation:

It is imperative that you contact your state legislators TODAY and express your opposition to these restrictive and discriminatory gun control measures and any proposed legislation that would infringe upon your Right to Keep and Bear Arms.

For help identifying your elected state officials and their contact information, please click here.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; secondamendment

1 posted on 02/05/2013 3:14:02 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76; dljordan; GraceG; dynachrome; unkus; loungitude; Washi; RandallFlagg; MileHi; G Larry; ...

Heads up!


2 posted on 02/05/2013 3:16:44 PM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Molon Labe


3 posted on 02/05/2013 3:24:00 PM PST by Howie66 (I can see November (2012) from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Gun manufacturers of certain semi-automatic rifles will be held civilly liable for crimes committed with their firearms. This is a direct violation of the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

And it 's been tried before. The gun haters all lost in court.

4 posted on 02/05/2013 3:24:48 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Molon Labe


5 posted on 02/05/2013 3:25:08 PM PST by Howie66 (Molon Labe, Traitors!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
You will be limited to magazines that hold less than or equal to ten rounds of ammunition, drastically infringing on your inherent right to self-defense.

Pass this BS law and it will make 10s of thousands of Coloradoans criminals.

6 posted on 02/05/2013 3:28:01 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Sad that this is happening in Colorado. You’d think a rural, mountain state like that would not vote for so many gun grabbing Democrats. Yet here we are, the state entirely run by liberals and voted for Obama for president - twice.


7 posted on 02/05/2013 3:30:58 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The one thing that can be counted on from the Left is that they never pass up an opportunity to screw with us.

At least there is that one thing. Those of us on the other side can't even count on one thing.

8 posted on 02/05/2013 3:33:21 PM PST by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Haven't seen much courage (but only hot air) from the Dums and gun grabbers since their anti-2nd Amendment bills haven't been introduced to a committee as of yet.

Updated 02/04/13

RMGO Oppose 
or Support

Bill Number

Sponsors

Subject (check bill for official full title)

Location
(where is the bill, as of update)

Status

Strongly

Support

SB 9 Sen. Scott Renfroe/Sen. Ted Harvey/Rep. Lori Saine Authorization for Concealed Carry in Public K-12 Schools Senate Judiciary Comm. Dead
Strongly Support SB62 Sen. Kent Lambert/Rep. Lori Saine Civil Liability for No-Firearms Businesses Senate Judiciary Comm. Dead

Strongly
Oppose

HB 1043 Rep. Mike Foote Definition of a Deadly Weapon House Judiciary Comm. In committee--Scheduled for hearing on Thur, Feb 7 at 1:30PM, room 0112
Strongly Support  HB 1048 Rep. Justin Everett/Sen. Kevin Grantham Use of Deadly Force in a Place of Business(expansion of "castle doctrine") State, Veterans & Military Affairs Comm. Dead
Strongly Support HB 1085 Rep. Perry Buck/Sen. Scott Renfroe Change Posession of Weapons by Previous Offender House Judiciary Comm. In committee--Scheduled for hearing on Tue, Feb. 5 at 1:30PM, room 0112
Strongly Support  HB 1169 Sen. Greg Brophy/Rep. Steve Humphrey Brady Bypass for Permit Holders State, Veterans & Military Affairs Comm. Currently waiting for a hearing date
Strongly Support SB 140 Sen. Vicki Marble/Rep. Lori Saine No Federal Laws Concerning Colorado Firearms Introduction Pending In committee--Scheduled for hearing on Tue, Feb. 13 at 1:30PM, room 353
Strongly
Support
 HB 1162 Rep. Chris Holbert/Sen. Owen Hill Constitutional Carry House Judiciary Comm. In committee--Scheduled for hearing on Tue, Feb. 19 at 1:30PM, room 0112
Strongly
Support
 HB 1170 Rep. Steve Humphrey/Sen. Owen Hill Authorization of Concealed Carry in K-12 Schools House Judiciary Comm. In committee--Scheduled for hearing on Tue, Feb. 19 at 1:30PM, room 0112
Strongly
Support
 HB 1187
Rep. Lois Landgraf/ Sen. Kevin Lundberg No New Federal Firearms Laws State, Veterans & Military Affairs Comm Currently waiting for a hearing date
Strongly
Oppose
Rep. Rhonda Fields

"Assault Weapons" Ban No Details Sponsor yet to introduce but reportedly working on it
Strongly
Oppose
Rep. Rhonda Fields  "High Capacity Magazine" Ban No Details Sponsor yet to introduce but reportedly working on it
Strongly
Oppose
Rep. Claire Levy Campus Carry Ban No Details Sponsor yet to introduce but reportedly working on it

Strongly Oppose

Online Magazine Sales Ban No Details Sponsor yet to introduce but reportedly working on it

Strongly Oppose

Charge purchaser for Brady Registration No Details  Sponsor yet to introduce but reportedly working on it

9 posted on 02/05/2013 3:34:57 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“Sad that this is happening in Colorado. You’d think a rural, mountain state like that would not vote for so many gun grabbing Democrats. Yet here we are, the state entirely run by liberals and voted for Obama for president - twice.”

Colorado has been annexed by California. It’s that simple.....


10 posted on 02/05/2013 3:38:02 PM PST by snoringbear (E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Mostly it is Denver and Boulder that runs over the rest of the state. I believe their are more than a few Dems who are going to vote no on any gun grabbing legislation.

This assemblyman for one.

" "I'm not sure why Democrats here in Colorado and in Washington, D.C., think that more gun laws is the answer," said State Rep. Ed Vigil, D-Fort Garland. "Bans or extra requirements are not going to prevent crimes. "

11 posted on 02/05/2013 3:39:59 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The Privileges or Immunities Clause is Amendment XIV, Section 1, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution. It states:

“No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States...”

Importantly, in McDonald v. Chicago, when all the other justices were focused on the 2nd Amendment, Justice Thomas wrote a superb defense of gun rights based on the privileges or immunities clause. He justified the heck out of it with footnotes, and it is a masterpiece of judicial writing.

And in this case, it opens the door WIDE to a suit in federal court by *anyone* oppressed by these new laws, as they are *clearly* an effort by the state to abridge citizen privileges or immunities, as far as their gun rights go.

Justice Thomas is a very, very smart man.


12 posted on 02/05/2013 3:44:10 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear
Colorado has been annexed by California. It’s that simple.....

Hispanics... Colorado has a rapidly growing population of Hispanics and they love them some Obama and leftists in general. We are beginning to struggle in Nevada, Virginia and North Carolina for the same reason.

13 posted on 02/05/2013 3:47:09 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
Doing a head count and the Denver/Boulder Dems anti-freedom bills appear to be heading for an epic failure.

Local lawmakers cool to more gun laws (Colorado)

"Cheerful that the Legislature is getting under way, Southern Colorado lawmakers gave generally high marks to Gov. John Hickenlooper's State of the State speech Thursday, although most are cool to tougher gun laws.

Whether it was new state Sen. Larry Crowder, R-Alamosa, new state Rep. Leroy Garcia, D-Pueblo, or veteran state Rep. Ed Vigil, D-Alamosa, the governor's call to universal background checks on gun sales didn't inspire.

All three called themselves Second Amendment supporters.

"I guess it's a subject for further discussion," said Garcia, the brand new House District 46 lawmaker. "But I liked the portions of his speech about expanding our treatment for people with mental health problems. The root of these (gun violence incidents) is often mental illness." "

14 posted on 02/05/2013 4:02:33 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

We have been completely overrun by Californians. They ruined their state now they are ruining ours.


15 posted on 02/05/2013 4:11:52 PM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug

Gun control don't go 'round here, law dogs!

16 posted on 02/05/2013 4:30:04 PM PST by TigersEye (The irresponsible should not be leading the responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Seems it’s populated mostly from the northeast now. Starting to wonder if it really isn’t a part of Germany.


17 posted on 02/05/2013 4:32:53 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Colorado Doug
We have been completely overrun by Californians. They ruined their state now they are ruining ours.

They are like locusts.

That is one of the problems with migration from blue states to red ones. Voting patterns tend to be generational, not based on the results of votes cast. So someone fleeing a blue state for a better job environment in a red state still votes the same way they did back where they came from. These people do not associate their habit of voting for Democrats with the failure of the state they just had to leave. All too often people just don't make the connection - they just can't see cause and effect.

I know, I live in Northern Virginia and we have the same problem here. It was once a reddish area, now it's blue - and getting deeper blue by the year. Virginia is still red on the state level. We are right to work, have a good conservative governor and a competitive business environment - but the more people that move here the bluer the state gets. Locusts I tell you. I see them come in here from the NorthEast and rust belt blue states to find work. When I have occasion to ask these people about their politics they almost always turn out to be liberals that fully intend to keep voting for Democrats in their new home. I sometimes ask if maybe they think it could be Democrat policies that wrecked their home states and forced them to move in the first place, and I've never found one that sees the connection. Seriously, not one.

18 posted on 02/05/2013 4:35:15 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
"RMGO was there today at the Democrats Gun Control news conference.

The split second they were done, Dudley stood in front of their podium and said “RMGO will be holding a response news conference outside on west steps in 5 minutes.”

The entire press corp covered our response. "

19 posted on 02/05/2013 4:42:28 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Thank you. Emails have been sent.


20 posted on 02/05/2013 8:34:53 PM PST by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

1-I won’t be subjected to anything, as I have what I want and need.
2-I won’t be “limited” to anything, as I’m keeping what I have.
3-I’ve already had more training than they could dream up, and I continue to train. My current permit will last longer than this law, or their political terms.
And, if it doesn’t, things won’t change much for me.
4-The state doesn’t issue the permit, the county Sheriff does. If the fees get out of hand, I’ll rely on the Second Amendment as my “permit”.
5-Not much interest in College Campus for me.
6-Liability issue won’t stand up in court.

6-


21 posted on 02/05/2013 9:38:21 PM PST by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
You’d think a rural, mountain state like that would not vote for so many gun grabbing Democrats.

Colorado was the first exercise of George Soros's state-flipping project methodology.

Basically, get control of the secretary of state's office, then run zillions of illegals and dead people into the polls using ACORN manpower and Soros money.

22 posted on 02/06/2013 1:11:42 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Importantly, in McDonald v. Chicago, when all the other justices were focused on the 2nd Amendment, Justice Thomas wrote a superb defense of gun rights based on the privileges or immunities clause.

But you may also have noticed that the four dissenters in Heller all insisted that there is NO individual right, and even went so far as to scrape up an old SCOTUS opinion from the 1830's (restated by the evil Cruikshank opinion of the 1870's, which was a Ku Klux Klan case involving voting rights and violence) that the BoR is NOT bound to the States. Well, clearly it is, certainly in the case of 2A by its own language and by the restatement of the right in the 14A's "Privileges and Immunities" Clause.

The Left Wing on the Court is clearly welded to the totalist, collectivist view that gun rights inure to USG and the State Governments only.

23 posted on 02/06/2013 1:19:05 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus

I see it from the perspective of a check and balance created by the founding fathers.

In this case of the people, the national government, and the states, which has been strongly out of balance since the 17th Amendment took the authority to appoint senators away from the states. This resulted also in the states no longer being able to defend *their* citizens against a direct assault by the national government.

Thus, optimally for gun rights:

1) They are an individual right.
2) This right is also shielded by the states against efforts by the national government against individual rights and/or intrusion against state authority.
3) This right is also shielded by the national government against intrusion by the states.


24 posted on 02/06/2013 6:50:14 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Best WoT news at rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

Big problem are the many people from California and the East Coast liberal states that moved here and brought their statists values with them to the voting booth.

You have Denver that mostly voted liberal and the trust fund kids from places like the East Coast such as MA, CT and NY that moved to Boulder and the mountain resort towns.

A couple of months ago, I was at the Apple Store in Colorado Springs and ran across a business executive and we had some discussion and Obama came up and I mentioned I didn’t support him and my preference was more libertarian views. The conversation ended and he said that President Obama was great and emphasized the word president.

> Sad that this is happening in Colorado. You’d think a rural, mountain state like that would not vote for so many gun grabbing Democrats. Yet here we are, the state entirely run by liberals and voted for Obama for president - twice.


25 posted on 02/06/2013 7:34:21 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson