Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Wrong Man for Defense Secretary
Townhall.com ^ | February 5, 2013 | Phyllis Schlafly

Posted on 02/05/2013 5:28:25 PM PST by Kaslin

Americans who are concerned about traditional freedoms and the Second Amendment have no difficulty understanding the message of the popular bumper strip: "If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." It should be just as easy to grasp the corollary: If nukes are outlawed, only terrorist countries will have nukes.

But somehow, Barack Obama and Chuck Hagel don't get it. In a 2007 campaign speech, Obama promised: "Here's what I'll say as president: America seeks a world in which there are no nuclear weapons."

Chuck Hagel is listed as one of six directors of a dangerous group called "Global Zero U.S. Nuclear Policy Commission." This mischievous outfit's goal is "to move toward a world without nuclear weapons," and its publications boast Obama's enthusiastic endorsement: "Global Zero will always have a partner in me and my administration."

Here are a few of Global Zero's specific recommendations: replace our offensive nuclear missiles with what they call "soft" instruments of power, such as multilateral cooperation, reduce the number of our nuclear missiles further than what Obama agreed to when the Senate ratified the New START Treaty in 2011, eliminate "all tactical nuclear weapons" and our "Minuteman land-based ICBM force" and announce "reciprocal presidential directives" (Obama is a specialist at issuing unilateral directives).

Here are a couple of the really silly statements in Global Zero's report: "security is mainly a state of mind, not a physical condition," and "nuclear weapons have increasingly become liabilities, not assets." The Global Zero report includes a lame endorsement of anti-missile defense, but it's clear that modernizing our missile defense system is not a priority, maybe not even wanted by the group.

Global Zero isn't Hagel's only dalliance in the search for a nuclear-free world. He also serves on the board of the Ploughshares Fund, a George Soros-funded group that advocates getting rid of our nuclear weapons.

The Ploughshares Fund is downright serious about getting rid of U.S. nuclear weapons. It urges massive decreases in our defense capabilities and slashing the U.S. nuclear force to only 292 deployed missiles. It promotes global governance -- no surprise there -- and also opposes U.S. development of a missile-defense system.

Ploughshares contributes to many anti-war and anti-nuclear groups that criticize U.S. foreign policy and military. It is a big backer of the Connect U.S. Fund (CUSF), which promotes global governance and tries to direct global policy by "grant-making on human rights, non-proliferation and climate change."

CUSF calls for massive slashes in our military budget so that U.S. money can be spent on "sustainable energy," financing a "green stimulus" and combating "climate change as a security threat." Other CUSF projects include urging U.S. troops overseas to wear the U.N.'s blue helmets, using the U.S. Armed Forces to take on the task of fighting "global warming" and "global poverty" and stationing U.S. "peacekeeping" forces worldwide.

Chuck Hagel sits on the board of a fund that is the main financial backer of a globalist group urging the United States to join the U.N.'s International Criminal Court. There are many reasons why this is a dangerous idea, but one of the most obnoxious is that this U.N. Court could prosecute American citizens and soldiers for alleged "war crimes" and other anti-American accusations.

Hagel also showed his globalist philosophy by supporting the U.N. Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). Fortunately, the U.S. has never ratified LOST; in December it proved its threat to national sovereignty by overruling the high court of Ghana with a decision that is domestically enforceable in that country and not subject to any appeal.

It's no wonder that the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, Republican Senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma, announced he could not vote to confirm Hagel as Defense Secretary because Hagel is philosophically opposed to vital issues affecting our national security. These issues concern our spending, our international engagement, and particularly our nuclear modernization.

Senator Inhofe added: "At a time when North Korea is threatening our allies with nuclear capabilities, and Iran continues to pursue a nuclear weapon and the means to deliver it, the security of our own nation and of our allies requires us to be vigilant with our own nuclear weapons and defense systems." Senator Inhofe is exactly right: America needs a Secretary of Defense who values and upholds U.S. sovereignty and military superiority.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: budgetandgovernment; chuckhagel; defense; iran; nationalsecurity; senateconfirmation

1 posted on 02/05/2013 5:28:31 PM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Has the Food Stamp President ever picked a department head that wasn’t corrupt or second rate?


2 posted on 02/05/2013 5:48:21 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; Travis McGee; LucyT; sickoflibs; Liz
Chuck Hagel is listed as one of six directors of a dangerous group called "Global Zero U.S. Nuclear Policy Commission." This mischievous outfit's goal is "to move toward a world without nuclear weapons,"...

Here are a few of Global Zero's specific recommendations: replace our offensive nuclear missiles with what they call "soft" instruments of power, such as multilateral cooperation, reduce the number of our nuclear missiles further than what Obama agreed to when the Senate ratified the New START Treaty in 2011, eliminate "all tactical nuclear weapons"..

Travis - this is crying out for artwork...

ping

3 posted on 02/05/2013 5:51:51 PM PST by GOPJ (What EVIDENCE justified blaming Benghazi on... an obscure video? Freeper TexasVoter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Hagel’s a terrible choice but I wonder if he’s just another spoke in the wheel of God’s judgment upon our nation(like Obama, the homosexualization of the military and the boy scouts, abortions, socialism, religious persecution, etc.)


4 posted on 02/05/2013 5:53:59 PM PST by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReformationFan

Hagel is definitely a bad choice, and I think you got something there. He could be very well be another spoke in God’s judgement. I believe his patience is running short


5 posted on 02/05/2013 6:39:48 PM PST by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Kaslin. I don’t think Hagel should be confirmed, but if it happens, it will be because of a bluff — someone who’s competent and evil will be suggested in place of the evil but incompetent Hagel.


6 posted on 02/05/2013 8:09:46 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

In a 2007 campaign speech, Obama promised: “Here’s what I’ll say as president: America seeks a world in which there are no nuclear weapons.”

Clearly, he’s been sniffing too much fairy dust.


7 posted on 02/06/2013 1:07:54 AM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I think Hagel is just a stand-in, for twelve months maybe. He has no executive experience, and will be overcome by various financial issues. When he figures out that he’s there to convince the generals to just accept a huge budget cut....he will wake up and announce his retirement.


8 posted on 02/06/2013 2:23:41 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson