Skip to comments.Sandy Hook DA cites 'potential suspects,' fears witness safety
Posted on 02/06/2013 11:30:20 AM PST by ExxonPatrolUs
Connecticut State's Attorney Stephen Sedensky has argued that unsealing warrants in the Sandy Hook case might "seriously jeopardize" the investigation by disclosing information known only to other "potential suspects." Sedensky said that unsealing the warrants would also: ""identify persons cooperating with the investigation, thus possibly jeopardizing their personal safety and well-being." "
(Excerpt) Read more at digitaljournal.com ...
I'm a plant because I know that children exposed to gunfire and dead bodies would not be laughing and joking about it all the next day. If I'm a plant, then the traumatized Soldiers and Civilians at Fort Hood would have no problem singing and dancing "Call Me Maybe" at the Grammy's after their Battle Buddies were murdered by Hasan. Right?
I'm a plant because I see through this sadistic, staged plot at Sandy Hook as a Reichstag Fire scheme to destroy the 2nd Amendment.
Get over yourself, and read something outside the realm of CNN.com.
could be ex wizard
Are you sure that this witch can be trusted???
For those that think toxic chemicals in the dirt are a joke...well..there’s this
If you are in Ct. I guess you better do some research to find out if you are going to be exposed to Mad As A Hatter chemicals
“Connecticut is among a half-dozen states with a property condition disclosure form that doesn’t specifically ask homeowners to divulge to buyers whether hazardous materials are present on a residential lot.”
I hate the lying adults complicit in this fraud, as I hate those who consistently stonewall the facts for them.
I see through their lies, as I see through their false emotions.
You still haven’t answered me
Are you STILL claiming that Police Officials threw clothing evidence out of a car to land in front of the car at a crime scene and also land several feet away from the car instead of leaving the evidence as they found it.
No -- they used levitation to do it and their psychic powers to see into the trunk. Thanks for helping me to see the light.
The towers were designed to absorb the impact of the largest commercial airliner of the day, the Boeing 707.
Got any evidence that says they looked inside the trunk prior to obtaining the search warrant???? Using the words that they searched the trunk. There are words on the scanner that they were searching inside the building.
So you ARE claiming that the police disturbed evidence at a crime scene instead of waiting for CSI - even to the point of throwing clothing out onto a pavement and contaminating it.
Yeh -- they reported the shotgun that was in the trunk on the LIVE police dispatch 15 minutes after getting there.
They either looked inside the trunk and saw it or they used their super power Xray vision to see through the metal. Super heroes can do that, you know.
<>Got any evidence<>
1] Interview with one of two mothers who witnessed the 8 to 10 kids running down to the firehouse, the Lanzas Honda with black sweatshirts strewn on the ground and all 4 doors open [indication that it had probably already been searched], the broken plate glass window at the front door, the unusual quiet just before the final gunshots rang out from inside the school, and the kids subsequently and orderly evacuating the building:
2] Video at 0:24 of the broken plate glass window at the front door of the school:
3] Police dispatch with video [at 0:50] of the broken plate glass window at the front door of the school:
4] Police Dispatch of the Sandy Hook shooting:
5] STATE POLICE IDENTIFY WEAPONS USED IN SANDY HOOK
6] Details of shooting at Wikipedia with other resources and links:
7] State Police: All 26 Newtown victims shot with the Bushmaster
8]Marilyn Gudsnuk real Sandy Hook eye witness. Sees 2 boys in front of fire station running from the school as 7 or 8 police cars were going in opposite direction.
“Yeh — they reported the shotgun that was in the trunk on the LIVE police dispatch 15 minutes after getting there.”
They said no such thing.
There was NOTHING said about a gun in a trunk.
Was he INSIDE the building?? For all you know he was referencing shot gun shells.
“1] Interview with one of two mothers who witnessed the 8 to 10 kids running down to the firehouse, the Lanzas Honda with black sweatshirts strewn on the ground and all 4 doors open [indication that it had probably already been searched],”
ABOSOLUTLY NOT AN ACCURATE CONCLUSION.
You DO NOT KNOW HOW those items got on the pavement.
It is more reasonable to ASSUME that they were like that before the police got there than it is to ASSUME the police contaminated a crime scene and tainted important evidence.
So what we have is STILL NO EVIDENCE that the police searched the trunk before they got that search warrant and before they went inside to find Lanza shooting.
All we have is Uncle Chip trying to force a narrative
A narrative that would indicate the Law Enforcement contaminated a crime scene and it’s evidence.
Perhaps they are bungling fools and tainted evidence. That is what you have to believe to believe Uncle Chip’s scenario.
9:55:25: Be advised, we have multiple weapons. One rifle and a shotgun
Nice. You’ve been reduced to directing childish insults to me based on my screen name. Internet victory is mine!
You mean the children are still ALIVE? Thank goodness.
So how did the black sweatshirts wind up on the parking lot outside the vehicle??? and why were all four doors opened???
How did the shooter’s car find its way to the parking lot? Did anyone see it get there? Didn’t think so. Worthy of more study.