Skip to comments.Jobless claims fall, trend reading at near five-year low
Posted on 02/07/2013 6:42:34 AM PST by traumer
Thu, Feb 7, 2013, 9:19 AM EST - U.S. Markets open in 11 mins. Advertisement Advertisement Stock Watch
Greenlight's Einhorn Sues Apple Over Cash Plans (See Story)
Jobless claims fall, trend reading at near five-year low ReutersReuters 41 minutes ago
Email 1 Print
A job seeker (R) meets with a prospective employer at a career fair in New York City, October 24, 2012. REUTERS/Mike SegarView Photo
A job seeker (R) meets with a prospective employer at a career fair in New York City, October 24, 2012. REUTERS/Mike Segar
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The number of Americans filing new claims for jobless benefits fell last week and a trend reading hit a near five-year low, pointing to ongoing healing in the labor market.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped by 5,000 to a seasonally adjusted 366,000, the Labor Department said on Thursday. The prior week's claims figure was revised to show 3,000 more new claims than initially reported.
Economists polled by Reuters had expected 360,000 claims last week.
Claims were volatile in January due to the timing of holidays and the dates on which weeks ended, but a Labor Department analyst said some of that volatility appeared to be receding. The analyst said there was nothing unusual in the data, and no states estimated their readings.
The four-week moving average for new claims, a gauge of the trend in layoffs, dropped 2,250 to 350,500. That was the lowest level since March 2008, suggesting a steady improvement in labor market conditions.
The claims report showed the number of people still receiving benefits under regular state programs after an initial week of aid increased 8,000 to 3.22 million in the week ended January 26.
(Excerpt) Read more at finance.yahoo.com ...
What they meant was more people gave up looking for work. Took awhile to learn how this administration talks but if you just assume everything has spin on it or is a lie or both it makes it easier to understand.
Any positive graphs are “pimped out” for obvious reasons by investment bankers and the like. Things maybe slightly improving, but the fundamentals are lacking (Especially with the current government’s “hand” on manipulating currency/regulations). Investment bankers still need to make money though, so accentuate the positives and downplay the negatives.
They’ve got at least two alleged conservatives here pimping for them.
Yeah, you’re always going to get those type of comments, but there were a lot of other very good comments on that thread.
Obama’s economic malaise.
The population is growing at a far faster rate than we are creating jobs.
Your metric, labor participation rate, is the key people should be focusing on (along with U6).
Here's the data from FRED:
Lets see, does anyone else think tha the insane numbers of people on “disability” might have something to do with it? Also just plain going up and living on other government plans? When there is no incentive to work and provide, many people will choose it. There is no pride any more, and no shame.
Initial unemployment insurance claims fell by 5,000, to 366,000, in the week ended 2 February. The four-week moving average decreased 2,250, to 352,750the lowest since March 2008.
- Initial unemployment insurance claims fell by 5,000, to 366,000, in the week ended 2 February.
- The four-week moving average decreased 2,250, to 352,750the lowest since March 2008.
- Continuing benefits programs reported 8,000 more claimants in the week ended 26 January, bringing the total up to 3.2 million. Regular benefits typically last for a period of 26 weeks; claimants are required to check in weekly to provide updates on their job search to receive compensation.
- Emergency unemployment compensation (EUC), which immediately follows the exhaustion of regular benefits, was provided to 1.83 million people in the week ended 19 Januarya drop of 288,471.
The four-week moving average fell to its lowest level since March 2008. Thats the good news. The not-so-good news is how slow the recovery is proceeding. The four-week moving average is down only 25,000 from a year ago. Meanwhile, the January unemployment rate edged up a 10th of a percentage point, to 7.9%, down from 8.3% a year earlier.
The recent changes seen in emergency unemployment compensation and extended benefits data may reflect the effects of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. These programs had been slated to expire at the end of December; however, they were extended until the end of 2013, as part of the fiscal cliff agreement. Continuing claims and initial claims were not affected by the fiscal cliff deal. The only programs threatened by the cliff were those serving people who had been receiving unemployment benefits for upwards of 26 weeks.
January payroll employment was nothing special, at 157,000. We are expecting about the same (150,000, to be exact) for February.
I wasn’t “poo-pooing” [sic] the “bad news” because I think the economy is improving.
Rather, I was trying to point out the sadness of the paranoid thinking that the statisticians in the bowels of the BLS are on some sort of PR crusade to make the economy look better than it really is. The numbers are the numbers, they’re not misrepresenting them for politics, they’re doing the best they can.
Also, you should learn the difference between the weekly jobless claims data which is the gross data of new claims of benefits, and the monthly unemployment figure, which nets the newly hired from the newly jobless to come up with a “net” figure. That is the reason why you can have positive numbers in the “initial claims” data week after week, but in the monthly report show the non-farm payrolls rising.
I have to go poo-poo something else now, but I’ll be back later to check for your apology.
“I have to go poo-poo something else now, but Ill be back later to check for your apology.”
Not a chance.
Thanks for proving my point.
Great concept, once one negotiates the tortuous labyrinth of things you can get sued for and pays out the small fortune in obamacare.
Me, If you want to work for my company, you're going to be a subcontractor and deal with your own stuff.
In the meantime, the government will be the biggest employee growth sector, because the rest of us have to have money left over from a finite resource when the day is done. They can just print more and promise it out to whomever they please, and make rules about who does or doesn't get hired that would land a private employer in court.
Jobless claims fall and welfare claime increased,so much for math.
I meant to say that the EPR is the lowest EVER!
I originally was going to post an image of just 16 years, but then realized I could get a graph that covered back to 84.
It will only get worse.
Indeed by the day.
Wow, I never realized it was so bad.
At this rate Obama will have the labor participation rate down to 61.5% when he leave office in 2017.
That is frighten scary. Cool graphs. Whee did you get them?
Actually it's not even close to the lowest rate ever. Here's the data from FRED back to 1970.
Got to the St. Louis Fed data site called FRED. 60,000+ economic time series there.
Thanks, interesting how the government actually posts the information needed to refute the Obama administrations claims yet the MSM cannot seem to find it so they just spout whatever they are fed.
I guess they know that the vast number of Americans will never waste their time to find the truth. They are too busy watching what’s on the latest reality show and reading about who’s who in the up coming Grammys.
Thanks for the welcome. From looking at your bio, you have been here since FreeRepublic started. That’s a looking time. Clinton was still president, and Obama was still racking up debt on his credit card. A lot has happened since you joined.
Thanks again, I guess I’ll see this comment posted sometime today, because I am still on probation. Hey you may know. How many times must I post a comment before I am off probation?