Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marco Rubio to deliver GOPís State of the Union response, of course
Hotair ^ | 02/07/2013 | AllahPundit

Posted on 02/07/2013 6:45:34 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Who else could it have been? Jindal and Paul Ryan have already done it, Rand Paul’s probably still too close to the rEVOLution for Republican leaders to be comfortable with him in a spot like this, and Chris Christie would just end up talking about how terrific Obama’s speech was. Half the reason party leaders are pushing amnesty, I’m convinced, is because Rubio’s that good in front of a mic and this issue gives him access to lots and lots of microphones. If, as McCain bluntly concedes, immigration reform is all about earning goodwill from Latino voters, then of course the party’s biggest Latino star gets this platform. And in case you’re hazy on who the target audience here is, Rubio will deliver his address in English and Spanish:

“Marco Rubio is one of our party’s most dynamic and inspiring leaders. He carries our party’s banner of freedom, opportunity and prosperity in a way few others can. His family’s story is a testament to the promise and greatness of America,” said Speaker Boehner. “He’ll deliver a GOP address that speaks from the heart to the hopes and dreams of the middle class; to our party’s commitment to life and liberty; and to the unlimited potential of America when government is limited and effective.”

“Marco Rubio embodies the optimism that lies at the heart of the Republican vision for America. On Tuesday, he will contrast the Republican approach to the challenges we face with President Obama’s vision of an ever-bigger government and the higher taxes that would be needed to pay for it,” said Senator McConnell. “Marco’s own experience as the child of immigrants has always informed his belief in limited government and free enterprise, which is why he has helped lead the fight against out-of-control spending and job-destroying tax hikes that continue to hold our economy back and stifle opportunity for millions. He was a natural choice to deliver the Republicans’ alternative to the administration’s reliance on government and debt.”

“I’m honored to have this opportunity to discuss how limited government and free enterprise have helped make my family’s dreams come true in America,” said Senator Rubio. “Limited government and free enterprise are the very foundation of what makes America special and separates us from the world, particularly through our strong middle class. I look forward to laying out the Republican case of how our ideas can help people close the gap between their dreams and the opportunities to realize them.”

Immigration will be mentioned in the speech, but an aide to Rubio tells CNN that that won’t be the focus. The focus, wisely, is on convincing middle-class voters more broadly that they’ll do better with the GOP’s limited government agenda. Rubio told Rush Limbaugh last week he’s confident that he (not necessarily the party, but he himself) can sell that idea. With America having just reelected the Sixteen Trillion Dollar Man, I’m pretty confident that no one can. Prove this eeyore wrong, Marco. Please.

Exit question: Between this and his influence over the fate of immigration reform, is Rubio the new de facto leader of the GOP?


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 113th; bhosotu; blog; bloggers; gopresponse; marcorubio; rubio; sotu

1 posted on 02/07/2013 6:45:36 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In English or Spanish?


2 posted on 02/07/2013 6:47:23 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Between this and his influence over the fate of immigration reform, is Rubio the new de facto leader of the GOP?

No.

3 posted on 02/07/2013 6:49:48 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Both.


4 posted on 02/07/2013 6:49:48 AM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, apparently 2016 is his turn.

:-(


5 posted on 02/07/2013 6:50:38 AM PST by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The focus, wisely, is on convincing middle-class voters more broadly that they’ll do better with the GOP’s limited government agenda.

I cannot take Rubio's smaller government rhetoric seriously as long as he's out in front on comprehensive immigration reform.

The two policies are in no way compatible.

6 posted on 02/07/2013 6:51:52 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Rubio is not "out in front on comprehensive immigration reform."

He is out in front on amnesty and he has plenty of Republican support to make it happen.

7 posted on 02/07/2013 6:53:41 AM PST by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: South40; BlackElk

Rubio’s romance with Amnesty and Cantor’s romance with no child left behind can only denote that Conservatism Inc. or GOPe is dying or dead. Their only ideas are from 30 years ago and have failed. Bury them soon and let’s start on something new and relevant.


8 posted on 02/07/2013 6:59:37 AM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

Conservatism, IMO, has just entered a decade or two in the wilderness. We are going to have to rebuild our own party and take the GOP out at the kneecaps in order to take this country back. And the sooner we all get onboard with that the better.


9 posted on 02/07/2013 7:11:43 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

During that 2 decades the illegals will amnestied and this country is lost. It will only be recovered by a massive reset event such as total collapse of world markets, a civil war, or a man made epidemic to thin the heard and wake people up. We can only hope that whatever happens does on a world wide scale so we are not vulnerable from the outside while we reset.


10 posted on 02/07/2013 7:21:57 AM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
In English or Spanish?

Per a related thread yesterday, BOTH. It will be delivered in English and in Spanish.

Ain't multiculturalism grand!

==

As for his amnesty stance: Either he is playing the 'conservatives' who are jumping on his bandwagon or McCain and the rest of the gang are playing him.

If he actually believed 'securing the border' is such as priority, why isn't he insisting that it be done NOW with existing laws, rather than another package of new laws?

[Most of us already know that no set of politicians, either on Capitol Hill or in the White House, Democrats or Republicans, are going to secure the border. Per one thread, HSD Sec (Napolitano) will 'determine' when the border is secure. LOL, Yeah, right. Napolitano declared that several years ago.]
11 posted on 02/07/2013 7:30:06 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
So, apparently 2016 is his turn.

Hard to say, at this point.

Christie, jBush, and Rubio are being touted as 'the one' for the next election.

Of course, half of those from 2012 will also try again, at least in the early stages of the 2016 race.
12 posted on 02/07/2013 7:33:06 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
Exit question: Between this and his influence over the fate of immigration reform, is Rubio the new de facto leader of the GOP?

He speaks bettert spanish than Jeb Bush, McCain is almost bound to be in his corner, and they can point to his 2012 Tea Party credentials.
Like it or not, he's all alone on the fast track.

13 posted on 02/07/2013 7:48:42 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: norton

Apparently, he speaks bettert spanish than I type English.


14 posted on 02/07/2013 7:50:08 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

to hell with rubio, why couldn’t Ted Cruz give the response?


15 posted on 02/07/2013 8:04:21 AM PST by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rubio is proof the GOP is already throwing 2016 for the Dems. This Amnesty Liberal will be a disaster


16 posted on 02/07/2013 8:57:20 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

IMO, Rubio is a stalking horse.

He’ll suck all the air out of the room from conservatives for the next couple of years, then gracefully step aside when his mentor, Jeb Bush, throws his hat into the ring.

We’ll see.


17 posted on 02/07/2013 9:08:56 AM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This could be the kiss of death for Rubio. In the past, the Repubs that give the response to SOTU are left in the mud. This isn’t some sort of launching pad as some seem to believe.


18 posted on 02/07/2013 9:31:00 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
I agree that Cruz would give the better response, but many believe this is some sort of a launching pad to Prez. Cruz is a Canadian, he can't be Prez. I disagree that the response is that important. I would rather have someone verbally dismantle Obama that worry about the Prez race 3 years from now.

Cruz is my Senator, I love him so far. A lot can happen between now and 2016. Usually, people burn out if the peak too soon before the election. I would be surprised if Rand Paul, Rubio, Paul Ryan, Christie, and other usual suspects even last till 2016. It almost always turns out to be someone we aren't talking about right now.

19 posted on 02/07/2013 9:39:26 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“He’ll deliver a GOP address that speaks from the heart," Cry a little tear for me, Rosemarie. Yeah, that's what we need from the `loyal opposition', more emo from Boehner & Co.
20 posted on 02/07/2013 10:13:53 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
I note your understandable silence as to your conservative credentials, if any. Making up phony "credentials" invites investigation of your claims. No credentials. No claims.

Remember always that your previous posts suggest that the "something new and relevant" that you pine for would be an America without Hispanics or Catholics and one concocted in the looney bin occupied by Ron (not Rand) Paul.

Since both Catholics and Hispanics have been here since before there was a USA, that part would be new. OTOH, it will never be. There are probably 25 million so-called "illegal" Mexicans here right now and whatever the hysterical grumps and bigots of the anti-Mexican zealotry may REALLY, REALLY, REALLY want, they aren't going anywhere else like Mexico in the absence of a total collapse of the US economy.

We have blithely hidden our heads in the sand for 40 years since Roe vs. Wade, making believe that it was just about "women's rights." Planned Barrenhood, since the days of Margaret Sanger (later abetted by such GOP-E "Republican" Board of Directors members as the late Peggy GOLDWATER and Dorothy Walker BUSH, mother of Bush the Elder and granny of Bush the Younger) just assumed that placing abortion mills in ghetto and barrio neighborhoods would assist in achieving, as Margaret Sanger used to say, "more children from the fit and fewer from the unfit." Goebbels would be SO proud! This was always the hallmark issue of the GOP-E, right up there with protecting Muffy's trust fund uber alles.

Now personally, I despise Eric Cantor (in spite of his Judaism) as a Trojan horse. He arranged for something north of half a million dollars from corrupt Texas contractors to pour into the campaign of carpetbagger Adam Kinzinger (from Chicagoland NE Illinois near Indiana) to defeat a superb 20 year incumbent Don Manzullo in an overwhelmingly Republican district thankfully distant from Chicagoland and up against Iowa in NW Illinois. Manzullo's crime was to publicly issue a call to Weepy John Boehner in December, 2011, for a resolution to tell Obozo: NO MORE DEBT LIMIT INCREASES. That meant that the corrupt interests that are the life support system of Boehner, Cantor McCarthy and other whores like them in the GOP-E "leader"ship might not get that ohhhh soooo important federal grea$e.

Today's news (New York Times 2/7/13) carries the story that the House Ethics Committee and the Federal Elections Commission is investigating the role of Peoria Congressman Aaron Schock in instigating Cantor to influence illegal levels of PAC contributions to Kinzinger.

Like most actual conservatives, I would abolish the federal Department of Education (among MANY others) and carry no brief for NCLB. As to "amnesty," I fail to see what people coming here for a better job, a better home, a better country and a better future for their kids have done wrong to suggest that they need "amnesty." They can stay put, live their lives and contribute to this country as the ancestors of almost all of us have done.

Of course, if you are an American Indian (native American to the pc crowd) you can complain about the results of all this immigration into your land. Somehow, I doubt that you qualify on that score. OTOH, almost ALL Mexicans here ARE descendants of Native Americans such as Aztecs and Arawaks and Apaches and others, even if not pure blooded descendants.

Also, your chosen examples Rubio and Cantor just HAPPEN to be Hispanic and Jewish respectively. Surprise! Surprise! and Surprise!

Ummmm, ideas of thirty years ago were the ideas of Ronaldus Maximus and the American restoration. You got a problem with that??? Do tell! Reagan's ideas were a failure??? Who knew? Naturally, you would find such ideas unacceptable since Reagan was neither an anti-Semite nor an anti-Hispanic bigot. He had a program to accommodate transient Mexican farm workers way back in the 1960s when he was governor and it had been requested by Senator George Murphy. Reagan was also close to the thoroughly decent Jack Kemp. Really sticks in your craw, doesn't it?

Something "new and relevant" would not include the Paulistinian (Ron not Rand) issue cocktail of the surrender monkeyism of Neville Chamberlain, legalization of drugs and sexual perversion posing as "marriage," the Sangerian passion for baby-killing disguised as a let the states worry about it (which they cannot under Roe vs, Wade), a minimalist level of national defense that might look like Fortress Iowa, most of the Libertoonian Party platform, and a disdain for a murdered Navy Seal hero straight out of the playbook of the Westboro Baptist Church (not to be confused with the fine folks who ARE actual Baptists) and its sorry excuse for a pastor anti-American Fathead Fred Phelps.

Rubio is a great guy with a real future and the GOP is lucky to have him.

"...(L)et's start on something new and relevant." That assumes that there is an "us" which there is not and which there never will be.

21 posted on 02/07/2013 4:18:24 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em, Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
I note your understandable silence as to your conservative credentials, if any. Making up phony "credentials" invites investigation of your claims. No credentials. No claims.

Remember always that your previous posts suggest that the "something new and relevant" that you pine for would be an America without Hispanics or Catholics and one concocted in the looney bin occupied by Ron (not Rand) Paul.

Since both Catholics and Hispanics have been here since before there was a USA, that part would be new. OTOH, it will never be. There are probably 25 million so-called "illegal" Mexicans here right now and whatever the hysterical grumps and bigots of the anti-Mexican zealotry may REALLY, REALLY, REALLY want, they aren't going anywhere else like Mexico in the absence of a total collapse of the US economy.

We have blithely hidden our heads in the sand for 40 years since Roe vs. Wade, making believe that it was just about "women's rights." Planned Barrenhood, since the days of Margaret Sanger (later abetted by such GOP-E "Republican" Board of Directors members as the late Peggy GOLDWATER and Dorothy Walker BUSH, mother of Bush the Elder and granny of Bush the Younger) just assumed that placing abortion mills in ghetto and barrio neighborhoods would assist in achieving, as Margaret Sanger used to say, "more children from the fit and fewer from the unfit." Goebbels would be SO proud! This was always the hallmark issue of the GOP-E, right up there with protecting Muffy's trust fund uber alles.

Now personally, I despise Eric Cantor (in spite of his Judaism) as a Trojan horse. He arranged for something north of half a million dollars from corrupt Texas contractors to pour into the campaign of carpetbagger Adam Kinzinger (from Chicagoland NE Illinois near Indiana) to defeat a superb 20 year incumbent Don Manzullo in an overwhelmingly Republican district thankfully distant from Chicagoland and up against Iowa in NW Illinois. Manzullo's crime was to publicly issue a call to Weepy John Boehner in December, 2011, for a resolution to tell Obozo: NO MORE DEBT LIMIT INCREASES. That meant that the corrupt interests that are the life support system of Boehner, Cantor McCarthy and other whores like them in the GOP-E "leader"ship might not get that ohhhh soooo important federal grea$e.

Today's news (New York Times 2/7/13) carries the story that the House Ethics Committee and the Federal Elections Commission is investigating the role of Peoria Congressman Aaron Schock in instigating Cantor to influence illegal levels of PAC contributions to Kinzinger.

Like most actual conservatives, I would abolish the federal Department of Education (among MANY others) and carry no brief for NCLB. As to "amnesty," I fail to see what people coming here for a better job, a better home, a better country and a better future for their kids have done wrong to suggest that they need "amnesty." They can stay put, live their lives and contribute to this country as the ancestors of almost all of us have done.

Of course, if you are an American Indian (native American to the pc crowd) you can complain about the results of all this immigration into your land. Somehow, I doubt that you qualify on that score. OTOH, almost ALL Mexicans here ARE descendants of Native Americans such as Aztecs and Arawaks and Apaches and others, even if not pure blooded descendants.

Also, your chosen examples Rubio and Cantor just HAPPEN to be Hispanic and Jewish respectively. Surprise! Surprise! and Surprise!

Ummmm, ideas of thirty years ago were the ideas of Ronaldus Maximus and the American restoration. You got a problem with that??? Do tell! Reagan's ideas were a failure??? Who knew? Naturally, you would find such ideas unacceptable since Reagan was neither an anti-Semite nor an anti-Hispanic bigot. He had a program to accommodate transient Mexican farm workers way back in the 1960s when he was governor and it had been requested by Senator George Murphy. Reagan was also close to the thoroughly decent Jack Kemp. Really sticks in your craw, doesn't it?

Something "new and relevant" would not include the Paulistinian (Ron not Rand) issue cocktail of the surrender monkeyism of Neville Chamberlain, legalization of drugs and sexual perversion posing as "marriage," the Sangerian passion for baby-killing disguised as a let the states worry about it (which they cannot under Roe vs, Wade), a minimalist level of national defense that might look like Fortress Iowa, most of the Libertoonian Party platform, and a disdain for a murdered Navy Seal hero straight out of the playbook of the Westboro Baptist Church (not to be confused with the fine folks who ARE actual Baptists) and its sorry excuse for a pastor anti-American Fathead Fred Phelps.

Rubio is a great guy with a real future and the GOP is lucky to have him.

"...(L)et's start on something new and relevant." That assumes that there is an "us" which there is not and which there never will be.

22 posted on 02/07/2013 4:18:48 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em, Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
I note your understandable silence as to your conservative credentials, if any. Making up phony "credentials" invites investigation of your claims. No credentials. No claims.

Remember always that your previous posts suggest that the "something new and relevant" that you pine for would be an America without Hispanics or Catholics and one concocted in the looney bin occupied by Ron (not Rand) Paul.

Since both Catholics and Hispanics have been here since before there was a USA, that part would be new. OTOH, it will never be. There are probably 25 million so-called "illegal" Mexicans here right now and whatever the hysterical grumps and bigots of the anti-Mexican zealotry may REALLY, REALLY, REALLY want, they aren't going anywhere else like Mexico in the absence of a total collapse of the US economy.

We have blithely hidden our heads in the sand for 40 years since Roe vs. Wade, making believe that it was just about "women's rights." Planned Barrenhood, since the days of Margaret Sanger (later abetted by such GOP-E "Republican" Board of Directors members as the late Peggy GOLDWATER and Dorothy Walker BUSH, mother of Bush the Elder and granny of Bush the Younger) just assumed that placing abortion mills in ghetto and barrio neighborhoods would assist in achieving, as Margaret Sanger used to say, "more children from the fit and fewer from the unfit." Goebbels would be SO proud! This was always the hallmark issue of the GOP-E, right up there with protecting Muffy's trust fund uber alles.

Now personally, I despise Eric Cantor (in spite of his Judaism) as a Trojan horse. He arranged for something north of half a million dollars from corrupt Texas contractors to pour into the campaign of carpetbagger Adam Kinzinger (from Chicagoland NE Illinois near Indiana) to defeat a superb 20 year incumbent Don Manzullo in an overwhelmingly Republican district thankfully distant from Chicagoland and up against Iowa in NW Illinois. Manzullo's crime was to publicly issue a call to Weepy John Boehner in December, 2011, for a resolution to tell Obozo: NO MORE DEBT LIMIT INCREASES. That meant that the corrupt interests that are the life support system of Boehner, Cantor McCarthy and other whores like them in the GOP-E "leader"ship might not get that ohhhh soooo important federal grea$e.

Today's news (New York Times 2/7/13) carries the story that the House Ethics Committee and the Federal Elections Commission is investigating the role of Peoria Congressman Aaron Schock in instigating Cantor to influence illegal levels of PAC contributions to Kinzinger.

Like most actual conservatives, I would abolish the federal Department of Education (among MANY others) and carry no brief for NCLB. As to "amnesty," I fail to see what people coming here for a better job, a better home, a better country and a better future for their kids have done wrong to suggest that they need "amnesty." They can stay put, live their lives and contribute to this country as the ancestors of almost all of us have done.

Of course, if you are an American Indian (native American to the pc crowd) you can complain about the results of all this immigration into your land. Somehow, I doubt that you qualify on that score. OTOH, almost ALL Mexicans here ARE descendants of Native Americans such as Aztecs and Arawaks and Apaches and others, even if not pure blooded descendants.

Also, your chosen examples Rubio and Cantor just HAPPEN to be Hispanic and Jewish respectively. Surprise! Surprise! and Surprise!

Ummmm, ideas of thirty years ago were the ideas of Ronaldus Maximus and the American restoration. You got a problem with that??? Do tell! Reagan's ideas were a failure??? Who knew? Naturally, you would find such ideas unacceptable since Reagan was neither an anti-Semite nor an anti-Hispanic bigot. He had a program to accommodate transient Mexican farm workers way back in the 1960s when he was governor and it had been requested by Senator George Murphy. Reagan was also close to the thoroughly decent Jack Kemp. Really sticks in your craw, doesn't it?

Something "new and relevant" would not include the Paulistinian (Ron not Rand) issue cocktail of the surrender monkeyism of Neville Chamberlain, legalization of drugs and sexual perversion posing as "marriage," the Sangerian passion for baby-killing disguised as a let the states worry about it (which they cannot under Roe vs, Wade), a minimalist level of national defense that might look like Fortress Iowa, most of the Libertoonian Party platform, and a disdain for a murdered Navy Seal hero straight out of the playbook of the Westboro Baptist Church (not to be confused with the fine folks who ARE actual Baptists) and its sorry excuse for a pastor anti-American Fathead Fred Phelps.

Rubio is a great guy with a real future and the GOP is lucky to have him.

"...(L)et's start on something new and relevant." That assumes that there is an "us" which there is not and which there never will be.

23 posted on 02/07/2013 4:25:13 PM PST by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline, Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Society: Rack 'em, Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk
Something "new and relevant" would not include [...] legalization of drugs

Legalization of drugs is very relevant to the Drug War's hyperinflation of drug profits and channeling of those profits into criminal/cartel/terrorist hands.

24 posted on 02/08/2013 8:16:51 AM PST by JustSayNoToNannies ("The Lord has removed His judgments against you" - Zep. 3:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson