Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Calif. seeks to adopt nation's toughest gun laws
ap/yahoo ^ | february 7, 2013 | DON THOMPSON

Posted on 02/07/2013 7:14:38 PM PST by lowbridge

Weeks after New York enacted the nation's toughest gun laws, California lawmakers said Thursday they want their state to do even more in response to recent mass shootings, particularly the Connecticut school massacre.

Democrats who control the state Legislature revealed 10 proposals that they said would make California the most restrictive state for possessing firearms.

They were joined at a Capitol news conference by San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, along with several police chiefs.

"California has always been a leader on the issue of gun safety," Villaraigosa said. "New York has stepped up and stepped forward. California needs to answer the call."

Among the measures is one that would outlaw the future sale of semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines. The restriction would prevent quick reloading by requiring bullets to be loaded one at a time.

Lawmakers also want to make some prohibitions apply to current gun owners, not just to people who buy weapons in the future.

Like New York, California also would require background checks for buying ammunition and would add to the list of prohibited weapons.

Those buying ammunition would have to pay a fee and undergo an initial background check by the state Department of Justice, similar to what is required now before buyers can purchase a weapon. Subsequent background checks would be done instantly by an ammunition seller checking the Justice Department's records.

The legislation also would ban possession of magazines holding more than 10 bullets, even by those who now own them legally. All weapons would have to be registered.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; california; christopherdorner; guncontrol; guns; leftwingmurderer; partisanmediashills; secondamendment

1 posted on 02/07/2013 7:14:45 PM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

They should name their new law after the rogue cop on the run. After all, it’s what he wanted.


2 posted on 02/07/2013 7:17:12 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
All weapons would have to be registered.

I'd love to hear exactly WHY weapons should be registered, unless it's to facilitate their confiscation at a later date. Even the most steadfast anti-gunner would have to admit that registration would in no way stop a single criminal act.

Mark

3 posted on 02/07/2013 7:20:33 PM PST by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

It would be more appropriate to name after their idol ADOLF HITLER.


4 posted on 02/07/2013 7:22:30 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

The answer is simple: an initiative to amend the State Constitution as follows,

All Laws restricting or infringing on any inalienable right, enumerated in the US Constitution, SHALL APPLY TO ALL PERSONS IN THE STATE, There SHALL be no Exceptions.


5 posted on 02/07/2013 7:25:46 PM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
California can adopt the gun control measures adopted by their fellow mexican comrades. Let's see how that works out for them. Might as well hand the state over to mexico. Get into bed with socialists, especially mexican socialists, and complain when you get screwed. Mexico is a socialist-fascist country, no bones about it. Keep encouraging their errant behavior, and Californians will get to suffer the consequences.
6 posted on 02/07/2013 7:26:41 PM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Not a single thing proposed by CA Democrat politicians would have stopped the leftwingtard nutcase named Christopher Jordan Dorner.

Are the Democrats actually trying to protect him and others like him? ~ by disarming the potential victims, these crazy killers can just run wild!

7 posted on 02/07/2013 7:27:07 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

Voting has cosequences. They will probably get much of what they are proposing into law. CA is now completely run by the far left with super majorities to do as they please.


8 posted on 02/07/2013 7:30:38 PM PST by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

California politicians are completely in bed with the chinese communist government. The Chicoms want gun control in california, and they will get it because we have a government now that is as corrupt as they are.


9 posted on 02/07/2013 7:32:49 PM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

It is so silly.

Enact all the gun laws you want Cali. You’ll have to close your borders next to enforce that. LOL


10 posted on 02/07/2013 7:33:21 PM PST by bigheadfred (make the first shot count)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MarkL
Even the most steadfast anti-gunner would have to admit that registration would in no way stop a single criminal act.

*grin* OK, I'll bite. They'll say: "If it saves only ONE Life!"

In other words, if some new law / act / measure / gun-free zone has the "potential" to deter or even marginally slow down yet another looney from going off then we need it now!

After all, think of all the laws, regulations, and standards someone like an LAPD LEO has to abide by, and we just know we can call them and be totally safe! They are the only ones who should be carrying those dangerous 'guns' anyway!P

11 posted on 02/07/2013 7:37:50 PM PST by Utilizer (What does not kill you... -can sometimes damage you QUITE severely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

They are still trying to find a way to get around Prop 15 that failed back in 1982.

That was the vote to ban handguns that was guaranteed to pass by a 2to 1 margin! Champaign corks were popping at Handgun Control Inc ahead of time!

It failed by a 2 to 1 margin leaving the legislators stunned. They have been trying to work around that ever since.


12 posted on 02/07/2013 7:41:21 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Click my name! See new paintings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkL

Admission that it wouldn’t stop any criminal acts is not in their thought process. Not relevant to their ultimate goal. Radical left wing extremist demokkkrats will do everything in their power for control since that is what the whole thing is about anyway. Nothing to do with guns. The bad guys are laughing their butts off. On another note, looks like former cops should all be on the prohibited list now. Especially ones from LA.

Molon labe.


13 posted on 02/07/2013 7:52:56 PM PST by rktman (Live the oath you took or get out of office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Another FReeper Posted that the CA Politicos were a little too quiet after the Sandy Hook Shootings. Well, no more.

I sold my Pre Ban AK “Assault Weapon” to a Retired NYPD Cop since I couldn't sell it here it CA. I wanted to get off the “list”, so after I sold the Evil AK I bought a CA Legal AR-15.

So here we go again, if I don't comply I become an overnight Felon although nothing has changed from one day to the next. The old Soviet Union has been resurrected.

Well, there will be no compliance this time around. I learned my lesson and will do what's necessary to protect my Freedom until the day I can move to one of the Free States. My non-compliant firearms may have to take a vacation to an undisclosed location since I refuse to Register my Guns with the Nazi Party, and Nazis they are.

14 posted on 02/07/2013 8:13:32 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (I only Fear a Government that doesn't Fear me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

As far as that murderous Ex Cop goes, if Obama had a Son...

No further clarification required.


15 posted on 02/07/2013 8:16:39 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (I only Fear a Government that doesn't Fear me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Come to Texas. We follow the Constitution here. You can even get your old AK back. We have plenty here.


16 posted on 02/07/2013 8:44:51 PM PST by 3Fingas (Sons and Daughters of Freedom, Committee of Correspondence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Let's see, release a bunch of prisoners into the population because of the already overcrowded and impacted prison system and attempt to incrementally disarm the population. Sounds like another 'successful' Democratic plan.


17 posted on 02/07/2013 8:47:48 PM PST by 444Flyer (Obama killed the Twinkie, but not the terrorists in Benghazi. What's wrong with this picture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
..They were joined at a Capitol news conference by San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee and Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa.

Mr. Villaraigosa couldn't keep his own pistol in his pants (ahem!), yet he wants to dictate to law abiding CA citizens what they can and cannot do.


18 posted on 02/07/2013 8:48:40 PM PST by 444Flyer (Obama killed the Twinkie, but not the terrorists in Benghazi. What's wrong with this picture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

noo york and kalipornia and several other blue libtard states are in a race to the bottom. All will lose.

Soon this country will be divided into free red states and tyrannical blue states. owebama’s goal is to force tyranny on ALL of the red states too.

This ride is getting bumpy.


19 posted on 02/07/2013 8:52:49 PM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

If we’re lucky, we can get these same freeloading, California politicians the toughest prison sentences for violating the Second Amendment rights of the people of California.


20 posted on 02/07/2013 8:53:44 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Now Playing. Obama II - The Revenge of My Father.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer

21 posted on 02/07/2013 8:56:29 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
You gotta love the childishness of these guys:

NY - WE have the toughest gun laws!!
CA: No, NO , NO! WE have the toughest gun laws!!!!
IL: Us too, Us too!!! We have tough gun laws and will restrict freedom MORE than you guys!!!!

Sheesh, what a bunch of wankers. I would laugh were it not so serious.

22 posted on 02/07/2013 8:57:08 PM PST by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok
All Laws restricting or infringing on any inalienable right, enumerated in the US Constitution, SHALL APPLY TO ALL PERSONS IN THE STATE, There SHALL be no Exceptions.

That law says that politicians and other eaters of the wealth honest people create are to be treated equally as well as those honest people. Completely unacceptable. If they wanted to be left alone to the extent that a good person should be, why did they join the Borg instead of getting a productive job. If we pay their salary, they shouldn't be presume to be on the SAME level with us, let alone above us.

23 posted on 02/07/2013 9:23:52 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

12/29/12

“California gun sales jump; gun injuries, deaths fall”

“Gun deaths and injuries have dropped sharply in California, even as the number of guns sold in the state has risen, according to new state data...”

http://www.sacbee.com/2012/12/27/5079151/california-gun-sales-increase.html


24 posted on 02/07/2013 9:27:42 PM PST by 444Flyer (Obama killed the Twinkie, but not the terrorists in Benghazi. What's wrong with this picture?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

Wow, I am glad I live in the middle of nowhere in WV. Those people in NY and CA are too enlightened for me.


25 posted on 02/07/2013 10:02:01 PM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

They are looking to overtake the notable success of such laws in Chicago. This should help retain some of the businesses they are losing to Texas. /s


26 posted on 02/08/2013 2:57:27 AM PST by Right Wing Assault (Dick Obama is more inexperienced now than he was before he was elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
Gun laws help only criminals.
27 posted on 02/08/2013 3:15:24 AM PST by TangoLimaSierra (To the left the truth looks like Right-Wing extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Come to South Carolina. This is a gun friendly state, so much so that our AR-15s are manufactured locally.

You’ll like our beaches except that the sunsets are reversed. Beach sunrises, however, are beautiful to see.

If it helps, California is but the largest of several states where a rural majority is dominated by the leftist politics of one megacity. There are none of those in S.C.

Y’all come!


28 posted on 02/08/2013 3:35:27 AM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson