The Blame-Righty Mob Falls Silent (Michelle Malkin)

National Review Online ^ | February 9, 2013 | Michelle Malkin

[Mamzelle]

What about Jon Stewart? I’ll bet he was a favorite, too.

[lentulusgracchus]

Michelle Malkin is a national treasure.

Bump. If her husband goes all weak in the loins and throws her out, I've got dibs.

[lentulusgracchus]

....Ann Coulter shows up a lot in it, especially with her past snarky shots at Sarah Palin.

Yup. Google up that Commentary trashing of Sarah from January 2010, and chase links and reader comments and you'll get an eyeful of how little East Coast urbanites think of the rest of us. It really is a bigotry, but the Eastern press cover for them and reinforce them.

You really have no right to stand for office, you know, unless you have an Atlantic Slope liberal-arts or Ivy college degree, preferably an MA or better. Otherwise .... well, you just aren't equipped to be a Real Person.

</snottiness>

Read the stuff, don't go by me. They're amazing. And people like Sarah, who's charismatic as hell and challenges their ideas of what leadership looks like, really bring it out. They were snotty like that toward Ronald Reagan, only people don't remember that so well now ..... Jimmy Carter got The Treatment, too, because he was from small-town America and the South. Never mind that he was one of Hyman Rickover's scary-brainiac nukey guys coming out of Annapolis. He sounded hick, so he was hick. And the East Coast Media went after every single one of his associates, because they were hicks, too, and Not Good Enough. -- Every. Single. One.

[jimsin]

MITT—AS ANN pointed out so well was the best man we had had the time given the circumstances...being on the right side every single one of the issues that will change america forever if unleashed 1. he opposed obamacare which will make america Europe 2. he opposed illegal immigration which if not done something about will make America ...CALIFORNIA ....think about it..

[jimsin]

There are many conservative pundits that we all enjoy, and very few we agree with on every issue. A chopfest on any of them is bad form and beneficial to the enemy. Just my humble opinion.RIGHT on every point BCC....

both ANN AND MICHELL are outstanding i just dont want anybody knocking a genius like ANN COULTER proporting she takes a back seat to ANYONE....that’s lunacy...

[jimsin]

'I personally do not consider Ann Coulter attractive... Skinny body, long necked, boney legs, unattractive face... I concede she has nice hair but it is used to cover up the other unattractive parts.'

I CONCEDE THAT someone needs A TRIP TO LENSCRAFTERS...IF THERE'S A 51 YER OLD ...OR A 30 YR OLD AS BEAUTIFUL AS ANN IM STUMPED TO NAME HER...AND I BET THE MAJORITY OF MEN ON THIS BLOG AGREE....AS THE KIDS SAY...SHE'S DA BOMB...HAHHAAH take another look at this beauty:



'Her books are the same old, same old with a new title... I stopped buying them several issues ago.'

AGAIN THE MAJORITY AGREE WITH ME HER SINCE BOOKS CONTINUE TO BE TREMENDOUSLY POPULAR BEST SELLERS....YOU MUST BE GETTIN OLD..

'I also concede she is sharp witted and likes getting into liberal’s faces...'

YEP THAT 'SHARP WITTED IN YER FACEDNESS, YOUNG MAN, IS EXACTLY WHAT'S NEEDED AND MISSING IN ALMOST EVERY CONSERVATIVE POL EXTANT.....AND IT'S WHY AILES HAS GOT TO REPLACE TIRED OLE BILL [there's yer same ole, same ole, lad] WITH THE NEW AND STUNNING ANN.... A MOVE THAT'D PRETTY MUCH SINK THE LAMESTREAMS FURTHER DOWN into the bog they exist in already ...

[neverdem]

Thanks for the link. Maybe Tony Bennett is getting senile.

[Windflier]

MITT—AS ANN pointed out so well was the best man we had had the time

Huh? You must have missed the part of my comment to you, where I said that Ann was pimping Romney for the Republican nominee while there were still REAL conservatives in the race.

[jimsin]

‘Ann was pi***g [my grandma thinks that word is low class] Romney for the Republican nominee while there were still REAL conservatives in the race.’

And which candidate did you hope we’d nominate and think ANN should have backed? i hope it’s not Nancy P’s couchmate...

[Windflier]

And which candidate did you hope we’d nominate and think ANN should have backed?

Which candidate I preferred for Republican nominee is beside the point. There were conservatives running in the 2012 primary, any one of whom would have inspired more center-right voters to get out and vote. Had one of them won the primary race, we might have actually stood a chance of firing Obama.

But no, we conservatives were forced to yet again accept the GOP-e's liberal choice as our nominee. As a result, the vote on our side was depressed because too many decent Americans couldn't see enough difference between the Democrats' liberal and our liberal to bother with it.

[Kickass Conservative]

I had the pleasure of meeting Michelle, her Husband and her then small Children some years ago at CPAC.

She is very pleasant, took time to talk for more than a few minutes while her Husband was left holding their squirming Children and she had a smile that could light up a room. She seemed genuinely happy and she showed real interest in the topic being discussed. On the other hand, I have attended a few small affairs with the David Horowitz group featuring Ann Coulter. What struck me is that Ann acts like she is always on her way to another gathering, looking to her ‘assistant” to help get things over with and leaving the impression that the people coming to see her and get a Book signed are just a bother.

That is my impression of both Women. I may be wrong about Ann, but I had the same feeling more than once while in her presence. No more hard earned KC cash will be flowing her way. It took me a little while to learn that a Leopard doesn't change its stripes. LOL, just a little Jungle humor.

[3Fingas]

I was going to make a reply very similar to yours; but, then I realized I shouldn’t have dragged Anne Coulter in this in the first place. One can praise someone without putting down another. Sorry for that lapse. I suppose that I just wanted to make the point that Michelle Malkin seems like a sincere, decent, Christian woman while many others seem to be more in politics for self-promotion or money. I could have made the point without pointing a finger.

[Kickass Conservative]

I didn’t mean to drag Ann into it either, but I wanted to point out the differences between what I consider a sincere Conservative Crusader and someone who in my opinion has just become part of the Elite Lecture Circuit.

Or, I’m completely off base.... LOL

All I know is what I experienced when dealing with both people. I think Michelle Malkin is a cut above and if others disagree, so be it.