Posted on 02/08/2013 4:50:28 AM PST by IbJensen
Remember when you entered the U.S. Armed Forces or applied for federal employment? There was one question on those forms: have you ever advocated the overthrow of the U.S. Government by force? Not so far-fetched now, is it?
Their best weapon is the IRS and the stupid Cloud technology where they can just seize any financial account they want by a key stroke.
If you read “You can still trust the communists to be communists”,
you’ll see that the communist revolution REQUIRES extreme violence in order for the takeover to be effective. They have to make sure the populace knows they will be brutally put down if they resist the utopia.
Why do you suppose BO is making public, his policy of being able to target and kill Americans who he sees as a threat.
It’s NOT about Drones and Islamists, dear!
The wording of that would not include advocating secession,
because that isn’t “overthrowing”, but separating from, the US Government.
bkmrk
Great way to gain credibility.....
Call the Civil War a loss.....
Gee, why do liberals keep labeling conservatives “racist”?
“If anything it should be called Revolutionary War II not Civil War!An inside military takeover would solve a lot of messy problems.”
Perhaps that’s why so many military leaders are being replaced with political hacks?
I have a different perspective which calls not for putting down but elevating "our ruling class politicians, MSM, etal", elevating them to the tops of lamp posts, telephone poles and sturdy tree branches lining our streets and in our parks..............
I don’t think secession is the answer. That would only fragmentize the country even more than it is now. We need to clean house, this time without the weasels stealing elections.
I don’t think secession is the answer. That would only fragmentize the country even more than it is now. We need to clean house, this time without the weasels stealing elections.
One thing that should be pointed out is that not one single Republican voted for it. The Dems had enough to pass it on their own, and they did, with Nancy Pelosi spurring them to completely abandon earlier attempts to work out a more moderate plan and instead to do whatever Obama wanted.
I agree that the Republicans probably didn’t fight as effectively as they might have, but I think at that point, nobody had yet been able to make that mental leap to realizing how completely lawless and unconstrained by either law or custom this Administration is. One of the reasons we’re seeing a bit more agressive behavior, even from unlikely sources, is that we are finally all acknowledging the unthinkable truth, which is that we have a dictator in office who has no respect for our laws and our procedures.
It was a war to separate from the central governing authority, and therefore another War of Independence.
Nothing “racist” there, unless you want to go “lefty” and use “racist” meaning “shut up”.
Orchestrate civil unrest and race riots then carry out terrorist attacks.
When you are in power use this tactic to gain more power.
When out of power use this tactic to claim the govt is becoming a dictatorship when the govt steps in to stop the civil unrest.
Prior to each terrorist attack, attempted attack, or threat of attack since 1993 the left has always ginned up, attempted to gin up, or had a plan to gin up some kind of civil unrest or when the president is a dem. created out of whole cloth news stories of how the “Right Wing Extremist” are violent and wanting to assassinate the president and overthrow the govt.
When there is a repub president the left openly talks of assassinating the president trying to force a govt crackdown so they can claim the govt is becoming a dictatorship.
It’s time for an American Spring. Do you think the media would praise it and tell the world how wonderful it is?
BFL
baraq and his fellow travellers are setting the table for either a terrorist attack or a financial crisis to have a crisis to take advantage of.
They want the chaos so that they can step in and restore order, their version of order.
As I understand it, that’s part of the Cloward and Piven strategy - collapse the civil society so you can come in and remake it into a socialist paradise. I also think Soros has a huge part in this.
baraq and his fellow travellers are setting the table for either a terrorist attack or a financial crisis to have a crisis to take advantage of.
They want the chaos so that they can step in and restore order, their version of order.
As I understand it, that’s part of the Cloward and Piven strategy - collapse the civil society so you can come in and remake it into a socialist paradise. I also think Soros has a huge part in this.
baraq and his fellow travellers are setting the table for either a terrorist attack or a financial crisis to have a crisis to take advantage of.
They want the chaos so that they can step in and restore order, their version of order.
As I understand it, that’s part of the Cloward and Piven strategy - collapse the civil society so you can come in and remake it into a socialist paradise. I also think Soros has a huge part in this.
There is no answer at the ballot box.
2012 was the final nail - the takers outnumber the makers, and/or there was massive fraud in key voting districts. The ballot box of liberty is closed.
I in no way would advocate “other” means of taking over the fedgov, so besides separating from it, what would you propose?
What does “clean house” mean, if you can’t do it through the ballot process?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.