Skip to comments.Eric Holder: Obama Decides Who's 'Entitled' to Second Amendment Rights
Posted on 02/08/2013 8:08:15 AM PST by RummyChick
video at link
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
He already decides who lives and dies (drones and healthcare) why not?
Hitler’s Germany decided who could have a gun and did so with permits and registration.
Holder reminded students at the historically black school that the leading cause of death among young black men is homicide.
He urged students to continue the civil rights struggle begun by their parents and grandparents.
I know they would like to take guns away from Whitey but it isn’t Whitey killing those young black men in Chicago...
Why isn’t Eric the Holder in prison where he belongs? He’s not an American. He’s anti-American, anti-Freedom, pro-corruption and anti-Bill of Rights. Damn commies.
This is what comes of negotiating away bits and pieces of our freedom over the long years. It was inevitable that sooner or later, the government would assess the situation and decide to take away what we hadn't willingly handed over.
All those fools, laughing and carrying on, thinking he’s just the funniest guy....totally oblivious and ignorant of what a TRAITOR he is.
Except for felons....who by law should not be allowed the right to a fire arm, NO ONE in or out of government should be able to say who is “entitled” to a God given right.
Everyday they push a little further, being aggressively controversial, it is a test. No one is stopping them, and they are winning.
You wouldn't mind if he weren't black. /s
It’s often said that gun rights are to protect us from tyranny.
I wonder how he would like it if George Bush were the decider of who’s “entitled” to First Amendment rights.
The categories he mentioned already are disqualified from owning a gun legally. What other laws could 0dumbo enact that would do anymore?
You hve to give 0dumbo and his monions ( including most of the press0 credit they ‘seem’ to make reasonable cases for more law
IF no one actually thinks about what the idiots are saying
“shall not be”
has specific and well known legal meaning,
and only someone that is being deceptive would try to tell you that it is “vague” or “can be interpreted”.
One of my favorite stories of the week:
“Fight over soda at East Dallas apartment sends pillow, glass jar, chicken flying (and tire iron)”
Clearly Holder needs to keep boxes of chicken away from certain individuals who would use them as a weapon.
“and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.”
Just STFU Eric Holder...and go away!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.