Skip to comments.Eric Holder: Obama Decides Who's 'Entitled' to Second Amendment Rights
Posted on 02/08/2013 8:08:15 AM PST by RummyChick
video at link
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
The leading cause of death of young black men is other young black men,
which is caused by young black men not having fathers in the home,
which was caused specifically by liberal government policies.
Yes, lefties, it IS all your fault.
Weaponized chicken LOL. Call Feinstein so she can get it included in her list.
This moron is too stupid to hold the office he occupies.
There’s probably a few tire iron females in the mix there somewhere
Is that so, Mr Attorney General? Silly me, I thought the Bill of Rights made that call. Oh, to be enlightened like the Elites of our age!
yep, the wimmens are gettin vishus these days too.
Thomas Jefferson said it best.
The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. Thomas Jefferson
The ‘wrong’ people to posess guns might include the ATF, the TSA, and several other Federal agencies whose actions indicate they believe themselves above the law.
I just want to punch my fist through his stupid melon head.
Hey Holder, the PEOPLE decide. Not you or your master.
WE do. GFY.
shall not be
has specific and well known legal meaning,and only someone that is being deceptive would try to tell you that it is vague or can be interpreted.
Lo’ these many years ago when I was writing “Program Requirements” the word “Shall” was the beginning word of most paragraphs and it definitely meant “Must, Will, No-choice”.
he Second Amendment does not make any exception for felons or for crazy ppeople or for foreigners or for anyone, and the wording is absolute- it bars any and all rules against firearms. All those caveats and nervousnesses of otherwise conservative Constitutionalist folk are answerable with the same answers we normally use anyway.
Felons and crazies will get guns anyway. When you say, "of course that doesn't mean crazy people or felons you are denying the wording of the Amendment and therefore rendering the Amendment interprepatable and thus meaningless. Felons and crazies will get guns anyway.
"Of course, that doesn't mean machine guns or A-bombs." Yes it does. The market limits who can possess the more expensive arms and people at George Soros's level have better ways to wreak their havoc than wasting their money on nuclear weapons which just destroy assets they can buy and profit from.
"Shall not be infringed" is the operative wording here. There is no "except for" clause. When you stuff one into the Amendment you negate the Amendment entirely because you admit of the ability to interpret the Amendment to agree with your own trepidations.
Yes, I do think they are probing our defenses in a way.
But they are also telling us what they think and what their plans are and, in doing so, they are certainly hardening our resolve...evidence of which is the shortage of weapons and ammo in stores and online.
Looks like he’s got a bad case of the mange.
Confucius say man who make insane man angry is crazy
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.