Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick
And here I've always seen the clear language of the 2nd Amendment as a restraint on government. Silly me.

This is what comes of negotiating away bits and pieces of our freedom over the long years. It was inevitable that sooner or later, the government would assess the situation and decide to take away what we hadn't willingly handed over.

8 posted on 02/08/2013 8:17:17 AM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Charles Martel

“shall not be”

has specific and well known legal meaning,

and only someone that is being deceptive would try to tell you that it is “vague” or “can be interpreted”.


15 posted on 02/08/2013 8:19:35 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson