And here I've always seen the clear language of the 2nd Amendment as a restraint on government. Silly me.
This is what comes of negotiating away bits and pieces of our freedom over the long years. It was inevitable that sooner or later, the government would assess the situation and decide to take away what we hadn't willingly handed over.
posted on 02/08/2013 8:17:17 AM PST
by Charles Martel
(Endeavor to persevere...)
To: Charles Martel
“shall not be”
has specific and well known legal meaning,
and only someone that is being deceptive would try to tell you that it is “vague” or “can be interpreted”.
posted on 02/08/2013 8:19:35 AM PST
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson