Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tight budget may force Pentagon to cut forces: general
Reuters ^ | 9 Feb 13 | David Alexander

Posted on 02/09/2013 4:46:32 PM PST by SkyPilot

The Pentagon will have to cut the size of U.S. military forces for the second time in as many years if across-the-board spending reductions of $470 billion over 10 years take effect March 1, the top U.S. military officer said on Saturday.

General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said about a third of the cuts would have to come from forces, with the remaining two-thirds taken from spending on modernization, compensation and readiness.

He noted that the Army had begun to shrink last year toward 490,000 from a high of 570,000, a result of efforts to trim $487 billion over 10 years as required by the Budget Control Act of 2011.

The Budget Control Act also envisioned the additional across-the-board cuts under a process known as sequestration. If those cuts go into effect, "the Army will have to come down again," Dempsey said.

Speaking to reporters traveling with him to Afghanistan, Dempsey said two recent high-profile examples of belt-tightening were attempts by the Pentagon to adapt to the current challenging budget climate and had nothing to do with sequestration.

The Pentagon said last week it would seek a smaller-than-expected pay increase of 1 percent for military personnel in the 2014 fiscal year budget. Pay increases have generally been pegged to an employment cost index and had been expected to rise 1.7 percent.

"That action is being taken to help us absorb the $487 billion in the Budget Control Act. It has nothing to do with sequestration," Dempsey said.

A defense official said the lower pay increase would save the department about $470 million during the 2014 fiscal year. The savings would amount to $3 billion over five years because future increases would be based on the lower 2014 raise.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: budget; cuts; military; sequestration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: SkyPilot
we rape the military

The budget is being cut about 10%.

21 posted on 02/09/2013 5:32:37 PM PST by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
Umm the cuts are real effective if you can actual see what has already been internally lacerated, so you have no idea wtf are you talking about; readiness/viable projects have been compromised yet you clap with insolent approval.
22 posted on 02/09/2013 5:34:48 PM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: palmer

...and missions are being expanded thus draining resources that hamper future readiness/tech/foundation. Wrong area to cut with all the wet work/COIN being asked to be perform.

23 posted on 02/09/2013 5:37:25 PM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi

Let’s see. . .Decrease in military spending . . .increase in illegal immigration benefits Goodbye America as we “knew” it

24 posted on 02/09/2013 5:41:22 PM PST by Maudeen (Proverbs 3:5-6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

If they still have mandatory muslim sensitivity training after these cuts take effect, then it wasn’t enough.

25 posted on 02/09/2013 5:43:18 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Freepers, your Contributions make every difference!
Please keep ‘em coming! Thank you all very much!

26 posted on 02/09/2013 5:53:43 PM PST by RedMDer (Support Free Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Well how about we pull our forces out of Germany,Japan, Britain,etc. and keep that money spent where we need it. The socialists in those countries lambast us and our soldiers and demand we leave until they realize how many billions of dollars we spend propping up their economies. I say let them spend their own damn money defending themselves and we can use some of the money basing those men here and prop up our own economy.

27 posted on 02/09/2013 6:24:36 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81

“The Gays and the Women will be safe from these cuts.”

I thought women worked cheaper anyway? Seems we could make cuts in their salaries as liberals claim they don’t get paid what men get paid anyway.

28 posted on 02/09/2013 6:25:20 PM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
this all phony sequester only cuts the increases - what is being spent today is not affected.

Did you even read the article? Have you done any news research on this?

Not only is the military dealing with a ~$45 Billion per year cut that started in 2011, they are dealing with decreased funding due to the Continuing Resolution. Sequestration is the final knife.

Because the military cannot touch military pay during the first year, all of the cuts this year have to come from Operations and Maintenance, the life blood of operations.

I hope America enjoys their entitlement checks, while men and women who have served this nation through hardship, loneliness, deployments, and sacrifice are under-minded.

29 posted on 02/09/2013 6:29:32 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mastador1
Well how about we pull our forces out of Germany,Japan, Britain,etc. and keep that money spent where we need it.

I hear that repeated over, and over, and over, and over, and over again on Free Republic.

It is another sign of colossal ignorance about how the military operates.

The US has a global mission because we have a global interest. Our political and economic power is directly tied to our military.

When the US responds and operates overseas, that requires overseas bases. Period.

In Europe, Rota NAS Spain, Sigonella NAS Italy, RAF Mildenhall England, and Ramstein Air Base Germany are major logistical and operation hubs. They are also on the now small short list of the military's few overseas enroute bases that are left. The US used to have access to scores of air, land, and naval bases all over the globe. Now, there a just a few. When the next crisis happens in the Middle East (and it will), or there is another terrorist attack on US soil (and there will be), or innocents are being slaughtered as in Rwanda or Bosnia, our politicos demand the of US military: "Do something now!"

You don't get the job done without overseas bases.

30 posted on 02/09/2013 6:37:43 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Maudeen
Let’s see. . .Decrease in military spending . . .increase in illegal immigration benefits Goodbye America as we “knew” it

Pretty much. It sure looks that way as of right now.

I like your tag line.

31 posted on 02/09/2013 6:40:14 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

I hear ya, it’s just the anger boiling over from every time the Dems get in office and immediately do their best to slice up our military. But hey Obama says we don’t need the military so much, he can just use drones.

32 posted on 02/09/2013 6:46:38 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rollo tomasi
GOP in 2011/12 were in favor of this “Super committee” or military cuts ruse, yet you blame Obama 100% for this, hmmm.

Congress hates it when people call it that, they preferred the "Joint Resolution Committee." I am not joking. I had a Congressman correct me.

I cannot, for the life of me, understand what the heck Boehner, Ryan, and Cantor were thinking when they not only agreed to this garbage, but that they agreed to let the military be punished with 50% of the cuts. Did they really (really?) believe that a committee with a bunch of Democrats on it (that the party got to pick) would enact reasonable Entitlement reform?

Maybe it would have succeeded if Max Baucus was promised a fifth and a hooker, Patty Murry was given a brain transplant, John Kerry was told there was a rich widow included in the deal, and James Clyburn was promised another cash kickback. Barring that, it was a disaster. The Democrats literally walked out, but not before telling the Republicans that they would cut Entitlements over their dead bodies.

So now, the military gets punished.

33 posted on 02/09/2013 6:49:30 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TexasKamaAina

How about cutting out a few generals? The military has become a slush fund for defense contractors and generals and other high ranking officers who become lobbyists and TV talking heads. They never met a new, expensive weapons system, plane, or ship that they didn’t love!

The military has become so politicized that I wonder how it operates at all. Billions wasted and still the troops are underpaid and don’t have the equipment they need.

34 posted on 02/09/2013 6:53:38 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

“I think it is a good possibility that this administration has/is creating a black citizen suppression army.”

If you’re inferring that black ghetto kids with no training, no high school diplomas and no idea how to aim a glock are about to march across America and subdue 70 million armed Americans, you don’t have a clue what you’re talking about.

Logistically, they first need to break out of their black ghettos and cross through the Mexican barrios that surround them. That in itself will cost the blacks a million casualties.

35 posted on 02/09/2013 8:02:08 PM PST by sergeantdave (The FBI has declared war on the Marine Corps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasKamaAina

love your name...must have been in Hawaii once...LOL. As to your post - NAIL ON THE HEAD!!

36 posted on 02/09/2013 8:06:14 PM PST by q_an_a (the more laws the less justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Who cares if the bloated military budget is cut? My city and state were invaded by a bunch of illegal aliens and the Defense Department did NOTHING! I know Freepers want a massive military budget....but, the invasion was and is from Mexico... Now the threat and rot is from within... Cutting a TINY amount from the military budge is hardly going to affect our national defense. Nobody did anything while we were invaded during the 80’s, 90’s and 2000’ let’s all quit whining about these “cuts”!

37 posted on 02/09/2013 8:27:01 PM PST by There You Go Again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: There You Go Again
The ineptitude and treason of Bath House Barry's embrace of illegal immigration does not justify fiscal war against a Constitutional enterprise (as Defense is). The US military answers any call its poltical leadership gives it.

I can kick my diabetic, old dog this morning because I am upset with illegal immigration. It would have the same effect (and be just as moral) as punishing our men and women in uniform because local law enforcement, ICE, and the Border Patrol are not empowered or are not acting within the law.

38 posted on 02/10/2013 3:10:56 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: palmer
For the life of me, I don't understand why people comment on threads without even bothering to click the links and read the articles.

If you did read the article, you obviously are unable to grasp the facts.

The Sequestration cuts are the final blow. The 10% is the amount of the cut required by the Budget Control Act of 2011, and Obama exempted military pay for the first year (he said this during the campaign last year to deflect criticism). Therefore, ALL of the cuts have to be taken out of the DoD's Operations and Maintenance lines. That cut will be ~25% or even more (no one know yet how bad). And ALL of that has to be cut between March and September.

Compounding the crisis for the DoD, Obama began cutting the military much earlier. There were almost half a billion dollars in cuts (spread out over ten years) that he pushed for and implemented. Secretary Gates started them. Thousand of jobs were lost. Modernization was canceled. This all began 2 years ago.

Making this even worse for the military is the fact that the Senate and Obama never passed a budget (the House did, but that became moot). The military has been operating under a Continuing Resolution for almost 2 years now, with funding frozen at previous levels and with no ability to even forecast new budgets for itself.

And now comes the knife across the throat to our readiness and capability: Sequestration.

Here is just one article that lays out some additional facts for you (if you take time to read it this time):

Sequestration threatens the country's ability to allow those in uniform to do their jobs. To understand what it means in real terms, look at the Air Force. Over the past decade, the service has been hit with numerous cuts and now the 2013 budget risks pushing airmen over the brink. There comes a point when people simply cannot do more with less. Unless Congress passes a sustainable and viable alternative to the Budget Control Act, challenges arising in the Air Force will be mirrored throughout the Army, Navy and Marine Corps -- curtailing the number of key policy options upon which our nation's leaders depend.

Read this is well - it demonstrates the myopia of your statement:

Army: 78% Of Combat Brigades Will Skip Training Due To Sequester, CR

This nation will pay a price for this epic fiscal malpractice vis-à-vis our military. Perhaps that will be part of God's judgment of our nation, because I see that coming.

39 posted on 02/10/2013 3:31:18 AM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Sorry to say, you are the one with myopia. I know enough about the defense industry to know there needs to be cuts. I have read many papers with both sides of the argument about the systems that are not needed. I would cut what my employer does because it is generally not practical. I would slash staff at large providers I have worked with, tons of useless middle level staff. I have worked with smaller providers, some are not too bad but none were vital. Johns Hopkins / APL is a joke. Mitre is a joke as well. I have not worked for any of these players but evaluated them objectively.

For training I have heard enough about it that I know it has too much talking and not enough doing. As for deployment, it is obvious to everyone that we need to cut in Europe. On the intel side, we need to end cold war intelligence. It was why we failed on 9/11 but it was not even effective against cold war enemies. Too much early generation (symmetric) warfare thinking. Too many GIGO computer systems that literally don't work.

Here's a CATO proposal: and some rebuttal: I had a really good paper on a fundamental restructuring of dod and intelligence, but I can't find it ATTM. It is strategic thinking that will sustain America's strength with our (still) very large budget, not doing the same things and trying to trim those.

40 posted on 02/10/2013 5:38:51 AM PST by palmer (Obama = Carter + affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson