Skip to comments.The president is lying about Benghazi
Posted on 02/10/2013 7:37:25 AM PST by NCjim
We all remember when Bill Clinton argued that it all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is. We were all disgusted that the office of the President had become so low that we were deciphering legalistic terms and arguing about sex acts. Oh for the good ole days.
President Obama's disregard for the truth has made Bill Clinton seem like a novice. His statements are always riddled with inconsistency. Many could easily have been dissected with a curious media, but that hasn't happen. Very few people can lie as well.
Leon Panetta testified yesterday before congress that the President was only briefed once at a previously scheduled meeting around 5:00 pm on the day of the Benghazi attack. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and his staff were already under attack at that time.Were they in danger, and who defines danger?
Did the President not care about their safety specifically or did he not expect things to escalate further. No one knows.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Bing Bing Bing
We have a winner.
Of course Obozo is lying. Benghazi was his plan from the inception.
And Obozo, like all Totalitarians, must lie because few would support him if they knew the truth.
Obama (or whatever his real name is) Lies, and he serves the father-of-lies.
When your a master of disaster lying is just part of the act.
Link will not come up.
They were Americans and he really didn’t give a dam. He probably went to bed and never gave the situation a second thought.
I really am disappointed in Panetta. A longstanding Clinton flunky ought to be better at lying.
Obama is one continuous LIE.
Motto of the Obama administration:
“We must all lie together, or we will most assuredly lie separately.”
Source: New Info on Benghazi Is Going to Come Out & Leave People Amazed & Shocked
Watch out, Panetta
For Obama’s vendetta
Or should I say Valerie Jarrett’s?
Remember: each case
Is argued on race
And never upon the merits.
How are the American people going to be "amazed and shocked" when most will never even hear about this new information from the American media? The only place this new information will be reported is in publications such as the UK Daily Mail or other overseas sources.
But yet, Obama gave his infamous morning after “Rose Garden terrorist attack” statement before leaving for Vegas. So if he wasn’t asking or informed during the eight hour attack, when did he first learn of the deaths? Panetta is lying, this “Obama wasn’t involved” is a red herring, which proves there is something so sinister, that they prefer Obama to look negligent rather than the truth come out.
He needed the evidence to be destroyed...and the witness to be dead...
So he did nothing...
I completely believe the truth is known to many Senators and Congressmen but the revelation of this would so damage the country.. it's being buried...
Hillary was right that Obama is not the person you want answering that 2 am crisis call to the White House, but her performance in the Benghazi fiasco wasn’t any better.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.