So then infiltrators who never believed in the Constitution but conned their way into office for the express purpose of acting against the Constitution and the people it protects .... are not traitors?
I’m thinking traitor-hood has to be based on intentional acts adverse to our national interests by those obligated to protect those interests, regardless of their personal beliefs at some earlier stage of their life. Just sayin ...
NO, I REPEAT, NO COMPROMISE! We don’t have to read this crap to know what’s in it.
When people act to pass laws that infringe our right to bear arms, and compliance will lower or jeopardize our security, then this is a treasonous act against our citizens.