Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vladimir998

So then infiltrators who never believed in the Constitution but conned their way into office for the express purpose of acting against the Constitution and the people it protects .... are not traitors?

I’m thinking traitor-hood has to be based on intentional acts adverse to our national interests by those obligated to protect those interests, regardless of their personal beliefs at some earlier stage of their life. Just sayin ...


16 posted on 02/10/2013 3:10:50 PM PST by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Springfield Reformer

NO, I REPEAT, NO COMPROMISE! We don’t have to read this crap to know what’s in it.

Molon labe!


19 posted on 02/10/2013 3:14:10 PM PST by rktman (Live the oath you took or get out of office!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Springfield Reformer

When people act to pass laws that infringe our right to bear arms, and compliance will lower or jeopardize our security, then this is a treasonous act against our citizens.


52 posted on 02/10/2013 6:55:13 PM PST by Bravo six (Bravo six)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson