Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kootenay {Canada} coal mines draw the ire of U.S. environmental agency
Calgary Herald ^ | FEBRUARY 7, 2013 | PETER O'NEIL

Posted on 02/11/2013 5:14:19 AM PST by thackney

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has made a veiled threat to take Canada to the International Joint Commission in a dispute over plans to expand coal production in the Elk River Valley of southeastern B.C., near the Montana border.

The threat was made in a letter that outlines concerns about the potential for pollution running down B.C.'s Elk and Fording rivers into two bodies of water shared by B.C. and Montana — Lake Koocanusa and the Kootenay (Kootenai) River.

The letter was sent to Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent in December by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.

She told Kent she hopes the federal and B.C. governments will support a study of the cumulative effects of existing and planned coal mine expansion in the area, mostly by Teck Resources Ltd.

"A cooperative bilateral approach on potential mine development in the Elk River Valley could obviate the need for a joint reference to the International Joint Commission," wrote Jackson, who resigned last month.

The U.S. government is under pressure from Montana's senators, who wrote to the U.S. Secretary of State in September complaining about the threat to the "treasured" Kootenai-Koocanusa watersheds.

Senators Max Baucus and Jon Tester argued mine expansion may be a violation of the 1909 Boundary Waters Treaty.

The treaty established the International Joint Commission to settle cross-border disputes involving pollution of rivers and lakes. It is made up of three Americans appointed by the president and three by Canada's federal cabinet.

The letters from the EPA and the senators complained Canadian authorities are examining coal projects on a piecemeal basis and are not considering overall impacts, including the "significant and continuing" increase in selenium leaching from waste rock into rivers and lakes.

Selenium is a "naturally occurring substance that is toxic at high concentrations," according to the EPA.

"B.C. is evaluating each coal mine expansion individually, with no legal requirement to conduct a programmatic environmental review to delineate the cumulative water quality and aquatic life impacts from contaminant loading from all of the mines," the senators wrote.

"Drainage from the Elk Valley mines present serious risks to the Kootenai Basin water quality and valued trout fisheries. It is imperative that international scrutiny be applied to the mines' downstream impacts."

A spokesman for Environment Minister Peter Kent said there hasn't been a formal referral to the International Joint Commission.

"The government of Canada is committed to working with the Province of British Columbia on addressing issues of concern to the U.S. in the Elk Valley," the spokesman, Rob Taylor, said in a statement.

He said environmental officials from the EPA and the state of Montana are participating in the B.C. government's review of Teck's Line Creek mine expansion proposal.

There will also be American participation in a planned federal review of Centermount Coal Ltd.'s proposal to construct the Bingay mine about 21 kilometres north of Elkford.

The EPA has raised concerns about both the Bingay and Line Creek mines.

The EPA said in a statement that it is pleased a federal review has been ordered for the Bingay proposal.

Teck spokesman Chris Stannell said his company has submitted regulatory applications for two mines, Line Creek and Fording River, in order to "extend the life of the existing mines and maintain jobs at those operations."

He said the applications do, in fact, consider the cumulative impact of all the Teck mines on the health of the watershed, and the company is proposing "significant investments" in water treatment facilities and water diversions.

"We are confident our existing and future development can be conducted in a way that balances environmental priorities, while also supporting jobs and economic growth in B.C."

The expansion of coal production in the area has drawn interest from environmental groups who say the mines threaten water quality and aquatic life in an important international watershed.

The coal is exported to Asian steelmakers.

"We're especially concerned about the proposed Bingay coal mine that would be located next to the Elk River, smack in the middle of a globally significant wildlife corridor that connects the Flathead River Valley to Banff National Park," said Sarah Cox, acting executive director of Sierra Club B.C. "Three years ago, the World Heritage Committee recommended a moratorium on new mining in that corridor."

She said there are several coal exploration projects underway in the area.

The EPA wrote to the B.C. Environmental Assessment Office in December expressing concerns about B.C.'s assessment of the Line Creek expansion, stating "we do not agree" with B.C.'s conclusion that the impact of selenium on water quality would be "negligible." It also expressed concern about the affect of selenium on bull trout, a threatened species in the U.S.

B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake was not available for an interview, but said in an emailed statement that the B.C. government understands the need to consider the issue of selenium "very seriously." It said an update of B.C.'s guidelines for selenium in water has been proposed and is out for "external review." And it said Teck is developing a valley-wide selenium management plan.

But the EPA letter complained Teck considered but dismissed additional mitigation measures - such as speeding up construction of a water treatment plant - due to "costs, operational complexities and . . . limited environmental benefits."

"These additional mitigation measures have potential to further reduce the extent of water quality impairment and adverse aquatic life effects, and reduce selenium loads to Lake Koocanusa," wrote the EPA's Montana director, Julie DalSoglio, noting high selenium concentrations found in waters not only near the mine but in Montana's Lake Koocanusa.

"Consequently, we are concerned about the dismissal by Teck of these measures."

TOPICS: Canada; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coal; energy

1 posted on 02/11/2013 5:14:26 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney


2 posted on 02/11/2013 5:17:43 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The U.S. E.P.A. should keep its nose out of Canada’s business. Isn’t it enough for them to ruin U.S. business?

3 posted on 02/11/2013 5:18:33 AM PST by Graybeard58 (_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
As if stopping the Keystone Pipeline wasn't enough of a hit to Canadian industry...

These people are waging war on the use of energy, period. They aren't content to just do that in their own back yard, they want to run the planet (from a climate-controlled mansion on the hill).

4 posted on 02/11/2013 5:23:45 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

As if the environmental regulations in B.C. are lax; you know, just another third world country.
I say this sitting in my office in BC at a copper mine in construction. I know about BC environmental regulations.

5 posted on 02/11/2013 5:33:09 AM PST by Cuttnhorse (God made man but Sam Colt made them equal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe
These people are waging war on the use of energy, period.

Just as a point of clarification, almost all the coal taken from this territory is used in steel-making, not for use in thermal power plants.

6 posted on 02/11/2013 5:35:11 AM PST by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney; Clive; exg; Alberta's Child; albertabound; AntiKev; backhoe; Byron_the_Aussie; ...
To all- please ping me to Canadian topics.

Canada Ping!

7 posted on 02/11/2013 5:37:21 AM PST by Squawk 8888 (True North- Strong Leader, Strong Dollar, Strong and Free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney



8 posted on 02/11/2013 5:40:58 AM PST by Iron Munro (I miss America, don't you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Canada has the means to get the USA attention in other ways, as well. Suppose, Canada were to link power transmission to the NE US to a more friendly attitude by the US Administration, for instance?
9 posted on 02/11/2013 5:43:01 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The Canadian Sierra club came to the American Sierra club and asked them to sic the mad dog EPA on the Canadian mining effort.

10 posted on 02/11/2013 5:48:44 AM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 .....The fairest Deduction to be reduced is the Standard Deduction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Dear EPA,

Minding your own damn business and focusing on the ruin of your own energy industry and economy, will make is possible for millions of Americans to seek refuge in our great county.

Pi$$ off,

11 posted on 02/11/2013 5:52:57 AM PST by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Looks like Obama is eager to add “War with Canada” to his resume...

12 posted on 02/11/2013 6:19:21 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has made a veiled threat to take Canada.
But not China?.

13 posted on 02/11/2013 8:19:32 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Since it the liberal BC province involved rather than the oil-producing Alberta guys, won't they probably go along with the EPA request?
14 posted on 02/11/2013 8:19:48 AM PST by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Mo fatass federale affirmative action hires with too much time on their hands....obviously they need to be fired so they can try out their advanced edumacation in communications or black studies at Burger King

15 posted on 02/11/2013 8:36:35 AM PST by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing --- Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cuttnhorse

Yeah, you said it. I used to live in the Beautiful Elk valley - lost my shirt in a restaurant business there in the mid-1980’s - and they could certainly use the economic lift.


16 posted on 02/11/2013 8:57:36 AM PST by gymbeau (Tagline too lame (er, physically challenged) to post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Please, you Canadians, tell the U.S. EPA to stick it where the sun don’t shine and do it publicly.

17 posted on 02/11/2013 9:05:38 AM PST by stboz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
The letter was sent to Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent in December by EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.

...and promptly filed exactly where it belongs :)

18 posted on 02/11/2013 4:10:15 PM PST by Dartman (Mubarak and Gaddafi are going to look like choirboys when this is over)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson