Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney

ethanol is and was and always will be a stupid idea


3 posted on 02/11/2013 10:20:10 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL
Some ethanols are worthwhile...


5 posted on 02/11/2013 10:23:16 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

Not if you drink it!....................


6 posted on 02/11/2013 10:24:16 AM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
"ethanol is and was and always will be a stupid idea"

If Iowa didn't have that stupid early Presidential caucus we wouldnt have to put up with this #$%&*!! For all his other shortcomings, at least McCain didn't kiss up to the corn farmers

12 posted on 02/11/2013 10:38:57 AM PST by Reo (the 4th Estate is a 5th Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
ethanol is and was and always will be a stupid idea

It depends on what your goal is. If your goal is energy independence it is a stupid idea since it consumes more fossil fuel energy in manufacturing it than it yields, HOWEVER; if your goal is to reward big campaign contributors and buy votes in corn producing states with an ongoing flow of taxpayer dollars then it's a resounding success.

21 posted on 02/11/2013 11:21:19 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
ethanol is and was and always will be a stupid idea

For so many reasons. You don't eat your feedstock.

31 posted on 02/11/2013 11:58:46 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL

No, ethanol is the least stupid option to fulfill a stupid mandate.

The stupid mandate is for an oxygenate in gasoline. Oxygenates make a difference in the CO emissions of only older gas engines with carbs and no feedback loop of O2 sensors in the exhaust system and a air mass sensor in the air intake.

The fuel system I’ve described above has been in most every car since 1986, as I recall, and in fuel injected, closed-loop systems, oxygenates (whether we’re talking about MTBE or ethanol) make no sense.

Still, the EPA persists in mandating them.

The smarter thing would be to remove the oxygenate mandate. Of the two more common oxygenates (MTBE and ethanol), I’ll take ethanol and keep our groundwaters uncontaminated.


37 posted on 02/11/2013 1:23:01 PM PST by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson